My only recent visit to the railway was last year. I travelled from South Wales to Wareham by train, took the bus from Wareham to Swanage, the train from there to Corfe Castle and back, and then repeated the outward journey to get home.
It was a long day, but I accepted that this would be the case, mostly because of the length of the journey from and back to South Wales. I had to wait for buses and trains at different times when in Purbeck, but it wasn't a problem as I was well aware of the times before I made the visit.
I'd have liked to take a direct train from Wareham to Swanage, but I understood that there have been a lot of problems with the arrangements (as detailed above and elsewhere), so it wasn't an option. Should it become an option in the future, I'll try to take the journey - but it's not a reason for not going to the railway again at some time. Such matters are outwith my control, so I'll accept what's offered.
This "customer behaviour" highlights one of the financial issues with operating to / from Wareham. The "customer" will visit Swanage whether there is the rail link to / from Wareham or not. Thus the only additional revenue SR receives is the difference between the Wareham <> Swanage return fare and the Corfe castle <> Swanage return fare possibly £4 or £5. Yet the railway has all the additional costs of running on the mainline including mainline insurance, station access and track access fees as well as the additional journey costs fuel and maintenance.
There is limited public utility. There are not that many visitors onto the Isle of Purbeck and certainly not enough to warrant subsidising the heritage railway when a modern bus service could be provided from Wareham at a fraction of the cost and offer a much more usable service. But you don't like buses so you won't agree - but whether or not you like it, that is the right answer.
Morebus operate the Purbeck Breezer 40 service hourly between Poole and Swanage calling at Wareham, Norden and Corfe Castle amongst other points.
In terms of utility (frequency, journey duration, fares, days and times of operation, points served) it is superior to the SRC offering. As far as I am aware it receives only a very small amount of public funding for early morning and late evening services plus Sundays in the winter.
SRC does not appeal to very many passengers wishing to use it purely for the purposes of transport. It does however strongly appeal in terms of a heritage / tourist experience.
Last edited: