Blame the IOC! - the official "initials" are "GBR"
Actually according to wiki it seems that it's a BOC decision as Team GB is a brand name so if they wanted to they could rename it to Team UK (which would be logical to my mind).
Blame the IOC! - the official "initials" are "GBR"
Yes, but the "initials" appearing on TV and in official documents would still be the confusing "GBR" (At least the BBC medal table shows NI as well)Actually according to wiki it seems that it's a BOC decision as Team GB is a brand name so if they wanted to they could rename it to Team UK (which would be logical to my mind).
I was cringing watching Gary Lineker talking to Ian Thorpe last night before the start of the swimming.
I think that it is down to the shift away from formality in modern life, along with the broadcasters wanting to put young, attractive faces on viewers screens (though whether the viewers actually care is debatable).
Well Lineker certainly doesn't fit the young and attractive ideal.
He has just shown how he doesn't have a clue live on t.v.
He said "I expect the other riders will be helping the favourites in the cycling time trial"
Well done to the lady cyclist paving the way for Team GB.......
Did you see the reporter who asked the road race winner questions though? More interested in how he felt about the GB racers. rubbish.
Typical of our sporting mentality that we celebrate a bronze and a silver in two events we won in the last Olympics as something wonderful. We have done less well ffs!
...
Feel very sorry for Paula Radcliffe. A world class athlete who has so many achievements to her name yet still missing that Olympic medal due to various factors.
You are welcome to your opinion. But two aspects need comment. First, Adlington actually swam a faster time in coming third than when winning, so she has improved. It is impossible to compare times on the road race over a different course, so you cannot really say that there was or was not an improvement. In both those events, others were faster, and, as i wrote before, you cannot dictate what your competitors do. It is not really applicable to compare with previous games.Typical of our sporting mentality that we celebrate a bronze and a silver in two events we won in the last Olympics as something wonderful. We have done less well ffs!
If it were me i would bin a silver or bronze medal (or at least give them to charity!) as they merely reinforce the fact that you weren't good enough but were the least bad performer on the day. That would hurt me incredibly. I wouldn't want to see my failure mocking me everyday.
To me you either win or don't. Who came second in the 100m at the last Olympics? I don't know but I do know Usain Bolt won.
To me winning is all that matters. Win at all costs no matter who you have to crush to get there, not this taking part that counts rubbish. Win. Do anything you have to do to win (as long as it is in the rules) but don't celebrate mediocrity as if it is something wonderful!
Feel very sorry for Paula Radcliffe. A world class athlete who has so many achievements to her name yet still missing that Olympic medal due to various factors.
To me winning is all that matters. Win at all costs no matter who you have to crush to get there, not this taking part that counts rubbish. Win. Do anything you have to do to win (as long as it is in the rules) but don't celebrate mediocrity as if it is something wonderful!
I'm 99% confident it's because he was annoyed.Indeed, bear in mind that TDF cyclists are probably the fittest athletes in the world, and couple that with the cheer and celebration that comes with winning, and you do have to wonder if Mr Cavendish didn't answer because he was annoyed, or didn't answer because he knew that it's a good point and hard to defend..
I don't agree that coming second or third is mediocre. It still means that your are one of the best in the world.
They had that at the closing ceremony in China though. The new one that is - well a totally fake one in fact.
If Facebook is anything to go by then I'm glad I missed it - hasn't it just basically a massive history lesson via interpretive dance? Further, apparently there's not even been a note of Black Sabbath, The Who, Iron Maiden, Judas Priest or Oasis played (all defining bands in their genre who've changed the face of it worldwide), yet there's plenty of Dizzee Rascall and Rizzle Kicks, whose contribution to the industry is yet to be fully demonstrated, certainly I'm sure out of Iron Maiden and Rizzle Kicks, the former has made the biggest impact on the world and are more recognisable. Don't even get me started on every Tom, Dick and Harry stating that it makes them 'Proud to be British' - if it takes thousands of people prancing about like Ken Dodd on ecstasy to bring out that sort of emotion, then I really don't know what to say. Furthermore, how does it make you proud to be British - did everyone Brit personally have a part; surely pride largely stems from self-achievement, not from something greater than a person (i.e. a country) or someone else (i.e. Danny Boyle) put together?
To be fair, I find him quite acceptable on Match of the Day, where he usually knows what he is doing and has a relaxed style with the pundits.
But he seems totally out of his depth with the Olympics.
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepag...ghanistan-hero-and-brands-himBABY-KILLER.html
It will be interesting to see how much pressure will be put on the soldier from above to drop any complaint.
Had this been in reverse I think everybody knows how the usual suspects would have reacted.
Hopefully won't have any though. But bound to have groups that will pressure that.
Currently watching the Sailing currently looks like Denmark are leading.
Chris
You are welcome to your opinion. But two aspects need comment. First, Adlington actually swam a faster time in coming third than when winning, so she has improved. It is impossible to compare times on the road race over a different course, so you cannot really say that there was or was not an improvement. In both those events, others were faster, and, as i wrote before, you cannot dictate what your competitors do. It is not really applicable to compare with previous games.
Secondly, why have silver and bronze? For a start, second place has beaten a hell of a lot of other competitors to get there. In the road race, the times for first and second were equal. And besides, it is a traditional part of the games. Or were you suggesting that only the British celebrate the "mediocrity" of being "first loser"? Try googling Brady Ellison, who was part of the USA archery team who took silver yesterday if you want to see the importance of silver outside this country.
As for this "taking part that counts rubbish", try telling that to the single sculler from Niger! And he certainly isn't British.
And one more thing (OK, so that now makes four!). Some people use the silver, sitting there mocking their failure as a powerful motivator to do better next time.
Funny people these sportsmen!
Sorry - I am not denigrating the athletes - they can only do as well as they can do. Plus they are about 10000000 to the power 400 better than I could ever dream of being!
What does annoy me is how we as a collective (Public, media and even some coaches and competitors) seem to accept second best as being good enough. I dont.
We celebrate like we have won the event when we finish as runner up or second runner up. That is a good achievement but winning is more important. I will caveat that by saying if someone fights through to a final against the odds and there has the performance of a lifetime and comes home second or third in the final inches deserves all the glory. A defending champion finishing third isnt good enough.
I dont believe in the taking part is what counts. Not when it comes to "Team GB" in a home games. A home games which have had millions pumped into both the athletes and the facilities. A home games that may well never come again in our lifetimes and a home games that should inspire people to perform beyond what they think they are capable of.
If they want to "inspire a generation" then win. THAT inspires more than anything else. If kids see John Smith winning the 112 meters final they are going to want to be him and emulate him. If John Smith finishes third they wont.
I understand and support the concept of the Olympics and fair play and decency and I love the Olympics and have done since I was a kid but I think in these special circumstances for us as a nation only Team GB winning a hatful of gold medals is good enough.
Perhaps I am just different to everyone else but I hate loosing with a passion and I hate settling for second best.