86247
Member
o yeah much more fun was in the DT yesterday going to Liverpool 68027 at the back and my god I could still hear it pulling away from Victoria and lea green
Where is your sense of adventure?The only improvement I can suggest is a 68 on each end of the train![]()
That would be hellfire.Several colleagues and I are desperate to see a 68 sandwiched between two MkVa sets... imagine that.
Unfortunately it will not work, the front DT would only control that set and the loco but not the set behind it.Where is your sense of adventure?
Several colleagues and I are desperate to see a 68 sandwiched between two MkVa sets... imagine that.
I’m involved in this project so know that it’s technically not possible, but still, just imagine...Unfortunately it will not work, the front DT would only control that set and the loco but not the set behind it.
I know it's a tongue-in-cheek suggestion, but would a 68 actually be able to supply ETS out both ends if such a setup ever happened?Where is your sense of adventure?
Several colleagues and I are desperate to see a 68 sandwiched between two MkVa sets... imagine that.
Sounds like a question for my engineering colleague!I know it's a tongue-in-cheek suggestion, but would a 68 actually be able to supply ETS out both ends if such a setup ever happened?
As far as I know some Belgian LHCS sets are able to work in multiple and divide en-route, much like multiple units often do. Obviously platform lengths would limit the viability of such operation for TPE.
As far as I know some Belgian LHCS sets are able to work in multiple and divide en-route, much like multiple units often do. Obviously platform lengths would limit the viability of such operation for TPE.
It wouldn't need to would it? The leading DT controls the locomotive as usual, so as long as the loco can supply ETS to both sets at once, the DT at the rear is unused just like the rear cab on any unit.Unfortunately it will not work, the front DT would only control that set and the loco but not the set behind it.
Unfortunately it will not work, the front DT would only control that set and the loco but not the set behind it.
I’m involved in this project so know that it’s technically not possible, but still, just imagine...
For one thing there's no gangway on the end that's normally against the loco, so there wouldn't be the ability to walk from one set to the other.If you don't mind me asking, what would happen if you doubled the coaching stock up back to back, and put a loco on one of the DT's? Or is it one of those 'we don't know unless we try it' moments...
Haha! You make a good suggestionWhere is your sense of adventure?
Several colleagues and I are desperate to see a 68 sandwiched between two MkVa sets... imagine that.
Those sound like interesting set-ups! I wonder though if the stock concerned is pre-‘computer with everything’ era?I know that the Dutch railways NS used to do it with Class 1600/1700 electric locomotives push & pull in various formations.
You could have....
Loco-Coaches-Coaches Loco.
Loco-Coaches-Loco-Coaches.
Coaches-Loco-Loco-Coaches.
All with driving trailers.
I also remember years ago seeing a German DB railways diesel Cass 218 in the middle of six coaches, 3 either side of the loco Driving trailer each end.
Those sound like interesting set-ups! I wonder though if the stock concerned is pre-‘computer with everything’ era?
Those Belgian trains can be huge- 25m double deck carriages, sets of 5+loco. So two coupled is ten carriages and two locos.As far as I know some Belgian LHCS sets are able to work in multiple and divide en-route, much like multiple units often do. Obviously platform lengths would limit the viability of such operation for TPE.
Does this come in English (for us non-techie guys)?
What's the garbage? It's staff having a laugh...Any chance the mods can delete/prune the last couple of pages of this thread? Far too much fantasist garbage posted.
I know it's a tongue-in-cheek suggestion, but would a 68 actually be able to supply ETS out both ends if such a setup ever happened?
As far as I know some Belgian LHCS sets are able to work in multiple and divide en-route, much like multiple units often do. Obviously platform lengths would limit the viability of such operation for TPE.
Those sound like interesting set-ups! I wonder though if the stock concerned is pre-‘computer with everything’ era?
Nova 3 in passenger service
Listed below are workings from the first week. Any corrections please let me know and I’ll update, I thought it would be good to have a summary of what’s happened and been a very enjoyable week
Saturday 24.08.2019
68026 plus TP09
5F48/1F48/1E25/1F62/1E39/1F76
1F76 terminated at Manchester Victoria and formed 5F76 19:58 Manchester Vic to Longsight.
Sunday 25.08.2019
68027 plus TP09
5E29/1E29/1F66/1E43/1F80/5H93
Monday 26.08.2019
68027 plus TP09
5F48/1E48/1E25/1F62
1F62 terminated at Manchester Victoria and formed 5H88 12:56 to Longsight
Tuesday 27.08.2019
68027 plus TP09
5F62 12:02 Longsight-Liverpool LS
1F62/1E39/1F76/1J53/5T54
Wednesday 28.08.2019
68026 plus TP11
5F62 11:55 Longsight-Manchester Victoria
1F62 Manchester Victoria to Liverpool LS/1E39/1F76/1J53/5T54
Thursday 29.08.2019
68027 plus TP09
5F48/1F48/1E25/1F62/1E39 (diverted via-Calder Valley and terminated at York)
1F76 (started at York).
1J53/5T54
Friday 30.08.2019
68027 plus TP09
5F48/1F48/1E25/1F62/1E39/1F76/1J53/5T54
Selected days Mon-Sat
5F48 04:54 Longsight-Manchester Vic
1F48 05:55 Manchester Vic-Liverpool LS
1E25 06:56 Liverpool LS-Scarborough
1F62 10:41 Scarborough-Liverpool LS
1E39 13:56 Liverpool LS-Scarborough
1F76 17:44 Scarborough-Liverpool LS
1J53 20:56 Liverpool LS-Stalybridge
5T54 Stalybridge-Longsight
Selected Sundays
5E29 Longsight-Liverpool LS
1E29 08:56 Liverpool LS-Scarborough
1F66 12:41 Scarborough-Liverpool LS
1E43 15:52 Liverpool LS-Scarborough
1F80 19:44 Scarborough-Liverpool LS
5H93 22:52 Liverpool LS-Longsight
For anyone still reading, pic below of 68026 at York with Wednesday’s 1E39.
View attachment 68004
Thank you, and updated.Thank you for the summary. The first day (24.08) was 68027, not 68026.