I mean, suggesting that there is an ulterior motive for vaccinations is very much part of the anti-vax playbook. But if you all want to ignore that then fine.
The reality is that there is not an ulterior motive for vaccinations. There just isn't. So suggesting that there may be is going right down that rabbit hole. As another comment said, if you are looking for an ulterior motive then you are looking for something that does not exist.
Oh, so this is that hostility you were speaking about on this part of the forum?
I don't see how that is relevant to this thread, but let just say I am not an admin of this forum and leave it at that.
Full of conspiracy theories? Oh please! There may be a higher proportion of people questioning the government's strategy (which I believe is allowed in a free society?), but its hardly full of conspiracies. Unless of course you view everyone that doesn't agree with you a conspiracist?
Suggesting that people are being purposefully diagnosed with COVID when actually they have flu is absolutely a conspiracy theory.
As is suggesting that the reason mass testing is taking place is specifically so the government can rely on the false positive numbers.
As is suggesting that there is a specific plan in place to be ban socialising forever, or have the rule of 6 forever (the plan and forever are the important parts of that claim that I am calling out).
And as is suggesting there is an ulterior motive for vaccinations.
All are things that people have said they believe in this forum.
Are you saying those are not conspiracy theories?
And by all means, in a free society people are allowed to believe in conspiracy theories (even madder ones than I've seen here too). But people are also allowed to call out those conspiracy theories as such. So just as if someone was posting here claiming that the earth was flat, I am sure people would very quickly suggest that the person is talking utter rubbish, why can't I claim the same when other theories that are almost as insane as that are posted?