• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Werrington grade separation updates

Status
Not open for further replies.

snowball

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2013
Messages
7,742
Location
Leeds
Press release


Network Rail has completed major signalling work on a new section of track north of Peterborough, ready for freight trains to dive underneath the East Coast Main Line, helping to cut congestion and increase capacity.


Over the weekend (Saturday 4 and Sunday 5 September) engineers commissioned the signalling system, which will allow trains to safely run on the two new tracks, marking a major milestone in the final stage of the project, part of the £1.2billion East Coast Upgrade.


Work began onsite at Werrington in Summer 2018 and the ground-breaking 11,000-tonne tunnel -which was built onsite as trains continued running on the East Coast Main Line - was pushed into place using innovative construction techniques in January 2021.


Teams then installed around 8km of track in the area which runs through the new tunnel. Over the summer, work has been completed to connect the new track to the existing Stamford lines and put signalling equipment in place.


Vital work to test the new tunnel will take place over the next few weeks and trains are expected to begin using it by the end of this year. Diverting freight trains underneath one of the busiest routes in the country will mean faster, more reliable services for both passengers and freight.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Brissle Girl

Established Member
Joined
17 Jul 2018
Messages
2,660
Have you noticed with NR press releases it's always "vital" this and "vital" that. Three uses in this release alone. I mean when is there going to be unnecessary signalling work that we've just decided to do for the sheer hell of it. It's a redundant word inserted just to big up the work done.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2021-09-06 220759.png
    Screenshot 2021-09-06 220759.png
    150.2 KB · Views: 24

norbitonflyer

Established Member
Joined
24 Mar 2020
Messages
2,399
Location
SW London
Have you noticed with NR press releases it's always "vital" this and "vital" that. Three uses in this release alone. I mean when is there going to be unnecessary signalling work that we've just decided to do for the sheer hell of it. It's a redundant word inserted just to big up the work done.


I suppose those who consider HS2 to be a white elephant would argue the disruption it is causing at Euston is not "essential engineering work"
 

WesternBiker

Member
Joined
26 Aug 2020
Messages
606
Location
Farnborough
Have you noticed with NR press releases it's always "vital" this and "vital" that. Three uses in this release alone. I mean when is there going to be unnecessary signalling work that we've just decided to do for the sheer hell of it. It's a redundant word inserted just to big up the work done.
Spot on. That would not have got past me if I were editor!
 

snowball

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2013
Messages
7,742
Location
Leeds
I always think it must be a highly depressing job to be a writer of press releases - always having to be so upbeat about everything, and often having to trade in half-truths.
 

trebor79

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2018
Messages
4,452
I always think it must be a highly depressing job to be a writer of press releases - always having to be so upbeat about everything, and often having to trade in half-truths.
Some of them revel in it. Our PR consultants came up with a load of ridiculous guff for one of our press releases. We rewrote it with sensible language and told them "Put this out instead, and use this sort of style in future and drop the hyperbole".
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,439
I always think it must be a highly depressing job to be a writer of press releases - always having to be so upbeat about everything, and often having to trade in half-truths.
If there’s any PR people don’t want to be upbeat about anything they should try for the RMT gig…
 

mwmbwls

Member
Joined
14 Dec 2009
Messages
648
Press release

Does this winter mean the start of the new timetable? - or will the opening be later than this to allow drivers to sign for the route?
 
Last edited:

trebor79

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2018
Messages
4,452
Is it just the freight that's going to use the diveunder? I expect the Pterborough - Lincoln etc services will continue to use the north end of platform 1, as they sit for some time and that would cause problems if they used the higher number platforms?
 

Lansraad01

Member
Joined
8 Sep 2021
Messages
5
Location
york
In case anyone is interested I sometimes produce computer graphics for this project. I have just released a new one showing the use of Fluid Mechanics.

 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,439
In case anyone is interested I sometimes produce computer graphics for this project. I have just released a new one showing the use of Fluid Mechanics.

Thanks for posting and welcome.

I think if people haven’t been following fairly closely they’ll be surprised at the complexity of the hidden aspects of the overall drainage system…
 

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
23,395
Location
Bolton
Is it just the freight that's going to use the diveunder? I expect the Pterborough - Lincoln etc services will continue to use the north end of platform 1, as they sit for some time and that would cause problems if they used the higher number platforms?
A handful of passenger services might use it if they work via Spalding to Peterborough and then their next working is via Stamford or vice versa. Diverted passenger services could also use it.
 

TheBigD

Established Member
Joined
19 Nov 2008
Messages
1,994
A handful of passenger services might use it if they work via Spalding to Peterborough and then their next working is via Stamford or vice versa. Diverted passenger services could also use it.

The 1835 Lincoln-Peterborough forms the 2020 Peterborough-Leicester-Nottingham. Having checked for the December timetable change its still booked in to platform 2 at Peterborough and across then ECML at New England on its way to Leicester.

Given that the Werrington dive under can also be used to recess a freight and not block the Spalding/Leicester lines I doubt we'll see any passenger services booked that way but I'm probably wrong!
 

mwmbwls

Member
Joined
14 Dec 2009
Messages
648
I concur Big D

Connecting-East-Lincolnshire-Greengauge-21-FINAL.pdf (greengauge21.net)
Greengauge 21 have produced a somewhat thin gruel report regarding rebuilding rail links in East Lincolnshire that raises in passing an extension of Thameslink to Spalding from Peterborough. Inherent to this would be electrification and the delivery of a decarbonised railway. I can only see this standing up if as part of a more general freight decarbonisation strategy involving Felixstowe to Nuneaton and Peterborough to Doncaster via Spalding.
 

DelW

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2015
Messages
3,880
In case anyone is interested I sometimes produce computer graphics for this project. I have just released a new one showing the use of Fluid Mechanics.
Wow, that's somewhat fancier than my one-time CFD colleagues used to produce!

Is the siphon necessary because the trench interrupts an existing watercourse or drainage system? It looks more complex than I'd have expected if it was just draining the dive-under itself. But there again, hydraulics were always a bit of a mystery to me :'(.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,439
Wow, that's somewhat fancier than my one-time CFD colleagues used to produce!

Is the siphon necessary because the trench interrupts an existing watercourse or drainage system? It looks more complex than I'd have expected if it was just draining the dive-under itself. But there again, hydraulics were always a bit of a mystery to me :'(.
I think I read in a planning document that there‘s some sort of surge storage system combined with the siphon. But that’s from memory of a planning document I read a year or two back. I think the trench does cut through an existing ground level watercourse as well, there’s one marked in the vee of the original junction on OS maps anyway, it’s apparently going under both routes.
 

fflint

Member
Joined
16 Apr 2012
Messages
121
As this thread seems to be coming to it's end, can I and I hope all followers or this thread, say a huge thank you to Crun and all they other "on site reporters" for keeping us all up to speed on this project.

Well done to all!!
 

DelW

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2015
Messages
3,880
Crun has posted the following in the Werrington thread in the photography forum (I hope the link works, but if it doesn't, it's in post 348 in that thread):

Trains on the ECML at Werrington Junction in mid-October 2021. A YouTube film from werrington junction:
(Edited to add)
This is that thread from the start:
 
Last edited:

helpstonjctn

Member
Joined
4 Jan 2020
Messages
8
Location
Helpston, UK
Is the dive under coming into service with the winter timetable on Sunday 12th Dec? If so, does anyone know what the first service is likely to be?
 

Freightmaster

Established Member
Joined
7 Jul 2009
Messages
3,495
Is the dive under coming into service with the winter timetable on Sunday 12th Dec?
That's still the plan, as far as I am aware!

If so, does anyone know what the first service is likely to be?
Probably nothing until the Monday, as there is no freight booked to run via Spalding on a Sunday,
unless there is to be a special 'inauguration' working to beak some strategically placed banners
on the Sunday?




MARK
 

snowball

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2013
Messages
7,742
Location
Leeds
Modern Railways, December, p. 19, says it will come into service in "early December" and adds:

"The dive-under is not electrified - passive provision has been made for installation of an overhead conductor bar, although this may require lowering of the tracks." (!)
 

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
16,739
Modern Railways, December, p. 19, says it will come into service in "early December" and adds:

"The dive-under is not electrified - passive provision has been made for installation of an overhead conductor bar, although this may require lowering of the tracks." (!)
Ah the wonders of "value engineering"
 

Brissle Girl

Established Member
Joined
17 Jul 2018
Messages
2,660
That would appear to rule out any quick extension of services to a Peterborough North station then as a poster on a related thread recently enquired.

Although whilst it appears an attractive idea given the extent of housing in the area, I can imagine it wouldn’t be cheap with a long platform required and the period whilst trains were turning around would reduce capacity on the joint line, completely contrary to the whole purpose of making freight easier to use it without other conflicts.
 

Mollman

Established Member
Joined
21 Sep 2016
Messages
1,236
That's still the plan, as far as I am aware!


Probably nothing until the Monday, as there is no freight booked to run via Spalding on a Sunday,
unless there is to be a special 'inauguration' working to beak some strategically placed banners
on the Sunday?




MARK
Depends when Boris / Grant Shapps is free for the photo-opp
 

norbitonflyer

Established Member
Joined
24 Mar 2020
Messages
2,399
Location
SW London
A handful of passenger services might use it if they work via Spalding to Peterborough and then their next working is via Stamford or vice versa. Diverted passenger services could also use it.
It's unlikely diverted passenger services would need to use it, as a diversion is only necessary if the ECML towards Grantham is closed, in which case there is no conflict using the flat junction. (Just possibly, if the closure is between Grantham and Newark, a northbound passenger service for Doncaster or beyond might use the diveunder to avoid conflict with a southbound Liverpool - Grantham - Norwich train)
 

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
23,395
Location
Bolton
It's unlikely diverted passenger services would need to use it, as a diversion is only necessary if the ECML towards Grantham is closed, in which case there is no conflict using the flat junction. (Just possibly, if the closure is between Grantham and Newark, a northbound passenger service for Doncaster or beyond might use the diveunder to avoid conflict with a southbound Liverpool - Grantham - Norwich train)
Indeed. An edge case.
 

Kite159

Veteran Member
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
19,266
Location
West of Andover
Indeed. An edge case.

The only one which could probably use the dive-under is the 18:35 Lincoln to Peterborough, as that will form the 20:12 Peterborough to Nottingham via Melton service. Just to save that Nottingham service having to cross over from platform 2 towards the Stamford lines.

Although I wouldn't be surprised if there will be a couple token services from Spalding which uses the dive-under to terminate on the high number platforms at Peterborough before returning towards Spalding for route knowledge. Especially if it's at peak time when there are more Great Northern branded services around
 

WilloughbyGC

Member
Joined
18 Oct 2017
Messages
14
Ah the wonders of "value engineering"
If true its a particularly appalling example of value engineering. The dive under project is solely for freight to be diverted from the ECML, now even more important as HS2 will no longer relieve it. According to DfT the rail network has to be decarbonised by 2040, yet for freight there is no known alternative to electric traction, as hydrogen and battery technology can't do the job. For that reason NR's own Traction Decarbonisation Network Strategy - Interim Programme Business Case (networkrail.co.uk) marks the line as 'core electrification' so why on earth would you not design the dive under to be capable of being wired?!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top