I should also point out West Lothian Day ticket is only £4.60 with First and Fiver with LCB
Isn't that because its winter?
What about say Fauldhouse to the centre single, or centre to Broxburn or east calder to town, or town to centre. I appreciate your analysis on the monthly and day tickets, and your subjective view of what is bread and butter. I also appreciate TGW points and analysis. It's fair sensible comments. As you know I work for LCB and in the past have maybe taken a more partisan views. But what I see daily and hear from our customers,. It is not as black and white as people may think. Can we do better absaloutley, could we advertise better yep. Could our presentation be better yep. Could our punctuality etc be better yep. And on weekly and daily tickets yes. But is it as bad and poor value as made out absaloutley not!
Lothian tour buses are having redundancies so that tells you all in tours land is not OK.
Anybody who still has any doubts about the EX2 clearly has an agenda against Lothian. It has been quite the success in Linlithgow.
However, I’m sure you’d agree that having to buy a bundle in advance isn’t appropriate for everyone. Also, whilst the facility for onward travel has value to you, it may be more limited as invariably, people don’t like to change and go for direct journeys.But if you buy it as an m-ticket bundle, it's only £3.50 on Lothian. And for a fiver, you get city-wide travel on top. That's vastly better value.
The poor rail service is probably why it works.If the EX2 is prospering, then good. I was always a little surprised that a small town with a good rail link (when it works) could sustain a service. That’s not some agenda - that’s just experience. It was a brave punt by LCB with substantial investment on two routes with a competing rail service but if they’ve been innovative and spotted a niche ignored by others, then they should be applauded as such.
However, before accusing folks of agendas, it’s not like you’re exactly a beacon of impartiality. There are too many partisan views on this thread but I ain’t one of them
However, I’m sure you’d agree that having to buy a bundle in advance isn’t appropriate for everyone. Also, whilst the facility for onward travel has value to you, it may be more limited as invariably, people don’t like to change and go for direct journeys.
Both firms are pursuing different fare models/strategies and some fares will work for some people and not others.
The poor rail service is probably why it works.
The poor rail service is probably why it works.
The poor rail service is probably why it works.
That’s one of the reasons also goes through Springfield which is where most of the commuters are picked up
exactly. Plus if you’re going to RBS Gogarburn, Maybury or Usher Hall area, then EX2 is better than the train. That’s before you get to how ScotRail absolutely shafted Linlithgow at the recent timetable changes.
I am genuinely ignorant on this one but in what way did the service from Linlithgow to Edinburgh change?
Dunblane services were removed from stopping at Linlithgow and Polmont (Now non stop Falkirk Grahamston to Edinburgh Park) Monday to Saturday off peak only and the Glasgow QS to Falkirk Grahamston was extended all stops to Edinburgh in its place. The number of trains stopping I think has increased but the timings are not that useful compared to before.I am genuinely ignorant on this one but in what way did the service from Linlithgow to Edinburgh change?
You now can't travel direct from Linlithgow to Stirling, as the Edinburgh to Dunblane service skips Linlithgow and Polmont for much of the day. It's been replaced by trains to Glasgow via Cumbernauld, which are much less useful.
It's not had much effect in the Edinburgh direction, but Linlithgow to Edinburgh has a really serious overcrowding problem, and reliability recently has been dreadful. I don't travel on that route any more, but if I did, the EX2 would be tempting.
Dunblane services were removed from stopping at Linlithgow and Polmont (Now non stop Falkirk Grahamston to Edinburgh Park) Monday to Saturday off peak only and the Glasgow QS to Falkirk Grahamston was extended all stops to Edinburgh in its place. The number of trains stopping I think has increased but the timings are not that useful compared to before.
This means that Larbert, Stirling, Bridge of Allan and Dunblane are only directly served from Linlithgow and Polmont at peak times to have the increased capacity to/from Edinburgh but it’s only a handful of trains. It’s also served late evenings and on a Sunday when the Glasgow QS to Edinburgh via Cumbernauld only runs Glasgow QS to Cumbernauld or Falkirk Grahamston
But if you buy it as an m-ticket bundle, it's only £3.50 on Lothian. And for a fiver, you get city-wide travel on top. That's vastly better value.
Where Lothian Country have zones First have graduated fares, so within one zone you could have various First fares from £1.60 to £3.40. So First could be charging £3.40 and Lothian Country £1.70 for the same journey. Plus First have returns. So cheaper for the passenger on the Lothian Country bus but more profit for First in theory. Also concessions are worked on these fares also. Going over the Zone boundaries it is sometimes cheaper by First. Especially Ratho Station to Edinburgh for example - £1.60 by First £2.70 by Lothian Country
How many people are stock piling day tickets?
Of course for most passengers a first day is the best vaule ticket.
As I say, I'm a little surprised only as when you have a parallel rail service of reasonable frequency (assuming the frequency actually occurs), express bus services have a challenge to compete especially when the main station is relatively centrally located as Waverley is. Perhaps helps when you have places like York to Leeds where both stations aren't exactly centrally located!
Ex 2 is doing OK. Reliability between haymarket and St Andrews Square isn't good enough due to lack of time (I drive them). Apart from that it's good with numbers steadily increasing particularly in Springfield we do rather well there. But my original point and the cause of my partisan views is because of statements like "first are way cheaper /better value just aren't true in a lot of cases. It's difficult to sit and read that when it's not the case. And I still haven't seen much evidence from the poster of said comments to support that theory. I really can't be bothered going into every ticket difference as my interest in buses is not so much in how they are run but on how they work and what there like to drive. But I know enough of the running side to know first aren't as cheap as some would suggest!
But my original point and the cause of my partisan views is because of statements like "first are way cheaper /better value" just aren't true in a lot of cases. It's difficult to sit and read that when it's not the case. And I still haven't seen much evidence from the poster of said comments to support that theory.
Spot on. I'd say First are probably quite a lot cheaper if ALL the following conditions apply:
I have no doubt that at the moment, that's a big group of people, but it may not always stay that way. People's work habits are changing and railway season ticket sales are falling, so if you depend entirely on that group, you're going to struggle, as it's getting smaller. My work travel habits changed radically in 2019, and I don't see myself going back to daily commutes any time soon.
- You travel to work by bus every day at peak times; and
- You use buses for leisure purposes at weekends; and
- You don't ever need to change onto Lothian's network when you get into the city.
First have lost me as a customer because they offer nothing for someone like me, who makes a lot of bus journeys to a mix of places, but at fairly randomly spaced intervals. They don't serve a lot of places I want to go. @overthewater seems determined to present me as some sort of random edge case, but I'm not. Lothian are providing exactly what I've wanted for ages, and I can't be alone in that. This sort of travel is a growing market.
Because buying separate Lothian and First tickets in the past was expensive and inconvenient, I often drove to Ingliston Park and Ride and used the tram to get into town if I needed to go to several places. Now I use the X38 instead.
Quite apart from anything else, First have been decidedly mediocre for years. If they want me back, they really need to up their game.
Spot on. I'd say First are probably quite a lot cheaper if ALL the following conditions apply:
I have no doubt that at the moment, that's a big group of people, but it may not always stay that way. People's work habits are changing and railway season ticket sales are falling, so if you depend entirely on that group, you're going to struggle, as it's getting smaller. My work travel habits changed radically in 2019, and I don't see myself going back to daily commutes any time soon.
- You travel to work by bus every day at peak times; and
- You use buses for leisure purposes at weekends; and
- You don't ever need to change onto Lothian's network when you get into the city.
First have lost me as a customer because they offer nothing for someone like me, who makes a lot of bus journeys to a mix of places, but at fairly randomly spaced intervals. They don't serve a lot of places I want to go. @overthewater seems determined to present me as some sort of random edge case, but I'm not. Lothian are providing exactly what I've wanted for ages, and I can't be alone in that. This sort of travel is a growing market.
That means you now a new passengers, in that respect. If other people were like you then LCB has generated new passengers!? I wonder if how many from Kirkliston have made a straight swap?Because buying separate Lothian and First tickets in the past was expensive and inconvenient, I often drove to Ingliston Park and Ride and used the tram to get into town if I needed to go to several places. Now I use the X38 instead.
I doubt First will.Quite apart from anything else, First have been decidedly mediocre for years. If they want me back, they really need to up their game.
You are clearly one of the people that benefits from the LCB/LB set up. There are others who don't and that's why both parties are now locked in with their respective customer bases. As you rightly suggested before, only if the real detail was published by LB in their accounts (rather than an opaque group set of figures) would you get the full picture. However, it will certainly be interesting to see the next set of accounts to see, even with the lack of detail, how the overall picture is with LB; however, that will be six months away.
One thing LCB could do better at is advertising that their m-ticket bundles are valid for six months - something I doubt many know.
... that makes me question the overall attractiveness of the wider Lothian inter-availability. We Brits.... we don't like (to) change.