More red herrings. Yes, he could board and there was no reason the ramps couldn't be used there. The point is about where he was getting off.
'Tony' is now playing games. He asks for a letter that says he could board at Manchester, and Northern Rail agree. So what, that isn't why the guard wouldn't let him on.
I am not playing games. I am trying to knock some sense into your one-sided minds. The thought of the guard being lazy is just unbearable for many of you. But the fact is he was lazy. He thought he would just let the next guard have the 'hassle' of assisting a wheelchair user onto the train. He never once thought this would come back on him.
Now, Northern Rail are not unthoughtful trianspotters like many of you, they are a professional company with rules and ethics. They have procedures to assertain outcomes. Here, they had the use of CCTV, other witness and officials' statements, and their rule book. Not to say the guidlines of the DDA.
Now, I read on this forum that the type of train concerned is not obliged to meet the DDA requirements until 2020. A time when they might be removed from duty. Now, NR could have used that as finding for their investiation. They did not. They could have said that problems with disembarking at GB, they did not. As it was not true.
What happened to all the talk of 'finding me wrong' in these forums and that NR would go through the pages for their investigation?
They could not find any reason as everything was in place for a wheelchair user to use the service.
Saying all that I am willing to travel on this train to GB. If anyone wants to arrange that I am ready.