I agree wholeheartedly. I'm English too, but I think that the English Tories are treating Scotland and the devolved Scottish parliament disgracefully. Sturgeon is quite right to protest that the strong Scottish remain vote had received not the slightest consideration from the woman hell-bent on a hard Brexit.
Neither has the English remain vote, or the Welsh, and there's been scant mention of the Northern Ireland remain vote.
About 1/2 the country voted to remain, and they're concerns have been ignored.
There aren't many who use another country's currency directly.
The Emirati Dirham is directly pegged to the US Dollar at a fixed exchange rate. So there's a huge argument to say that the sheikhs in Abu Dhabi are controlled by decisions in Washington and New York.
Scotland has a population about 5,373,000, and a GDP of $245b.
Panama uses the US dollar as legal tender (in addition to it's own coins which are a 1:1 mapping), with a population of 4,058,374 and GDP of $82b
El Salvador is the same, 6,377,195 and $52b
and Equador with 16,144,000 and $195b
Kosovo with a population of 1,859,203 (2014) and GDP of $19b uses the Euro.
What if the rUK does not want to give them to Scotland and strictly speaking they should not due to them not being strictly part of the pre Union Scottish state.
We're not talking about divvying up Paul Sidorczuk's gardens (which I understand are of a similar area as Uist), the UK (at least on paper) recognises the right to self determination. If Shetland want's to be independent, that's fine. If it wants to be part of Scotland, that's fine.