• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

EU Referendum: The result and aftermath...

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Class37.4

Member
Joined
8 Oct 2018
Messages
125
Can't wait to see Rees-Mogg's and Johnson's amazing alternative deals

I really do not understand RM and Co, clearly quite happy with no deal, claiming it wouldn't be a problem or cause job losses because most countries trade under WTO terms. But surely anyone with at least a modicum of brains can understand that for years our industry and business have traded with Europe and shipped components around Europe with no Tariffs or Border issues, You cannot suddenly change that and not expect their to be significant changes to business practise and potential Job loses its crazy.
 

Howardh

Established Member
Joined
17 May 2011
Messages
8,221
May's called a press conference at 5pm. Not a statement, just a press conference. She's got parliament against her, the public (both sides) against her, might as well go for the hat-trick and have the press against her.
 

NSEFAN

Established Member
Joined
17 Jun 2007
Messages
3,504
Location
Southampton
May's called a press conference at 5pm. Not a statement, just a press conference. She's got parliament against her, the public (both sides) against her, might as well go for the hat-trick and have the press against her.
The deal being proposed is a transient one, isn't it? If so, it doesn't sound too unreasonable. We still get to trade with the EU but have to accept some terms set by them. This is quite logical as they are the bigger market and we are already geared up for compliance with them, for legacy reasons. Having a stable relationship which is similar to what we have now will give the government more time to thrash out something for the longer term.

I reckon that this was almost inevitable, regardless of who was PM at the time. Johnson, Rees-Mogg et al. can wibble all they like, but the truth is that May has at least stuck to her station until now, despite the almost inevitable outcome. I doubt that those cowards would have done the same.
 

Basher

Member
Joined
6 Oct 2017
Messages
333
May had no chance of getting a good deal for the UK, if we got a good deal other EU countries would want to follow us. She can not please both sides of the debate, there is no compromise between in and out. Democracy has dictated the majority of people who voted want out. A no deal will have a bigger negative effect on the EU than us. In the short term we will have a rough ride but long term the whole of the UK will be better off.
Lets get on with the preparation for a no deal and start and talk to the rest of the world. My recent big worry is the European army proposal. The head of a country has the say if we go to war, a European army would be manged by an un-elected head, and we would have no say, or recon-pence of being able to vote them out, as we did with Blair. Just look at what the European courts have done to us, we can not kick the bad boys out of the UK, as they are entitled to a family life.
If we do not leave with a good deal or a no deal, the Tories will split and UKIP will become the third elected party. Please before any criticism of UKIP read what other polices they would support.
 

EM2

Established Member
Joined
16 Nov 2008
Messages
7,522
Location
The home of the concrete cow
May had no chance of getting a good deal for the UK, if we got a good deal other EU countries would want to follow us.
So why bother negotiating at all? Activate Article 50, wait two years and walk away.
A no deal will have a bigger negative effect on the EU than us. In the short term we will have a rough ride but long term the whole of the UK will be better off.
Evidence?​
Please before any criticism of UKIP read what other polices they would support.
Done that. They're still far-right fantasists. What have they done for the UK in the European Parliament since their supposed huge victory a few years ago?
 

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
14,296
Location
St Albans
actually not worth it.
I agree. All of those lies about how much more they needed us that us them have been truly sucked-up. Maybe most leavers just aren't very good at basic arithmetic. I'll try to make it easy for them:
The population of the EU nations less the UK is about 433 million and their total exports to the UK are about £288 billion.
The population of the UK is about 65 million, and its exports to the rest of the EU about £274 billion.
So doing the quite simple calculation of exports divided by population gives the amount at risk per capita:
a) EU (27) loses all of it's UK export market, cost per citizen in those countries = £288 billion divided by 433 million = approx. £650
a) UK losses all of it's EU (27) export market, cost per citizen in those countries = £274 billion divided by 65 million = approx. £4215
Maybe everybody here but leavers are missing something but to me, every citizen in the UK being £4215 out of pocket seems a lot worse than every EU(27) citizen being just £650 short.
Then there is the lie about a European army. It is proposed, not (even yet) for real and just as the UK managed to stay out of the Euro and Schengen, there would be no way that we could be forced to commit out forces to an EU chosen commander, elected or not, (even one that happened to be a UK citizen).
And it is the populists who keep whining on about fake news yet they are the first to believe obvious lies as long as they come from one of their dubious cheerleaders. What a dystopian society we have grown into over the last 8 years.
 
Last edited:

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
14,296
Location
St Albans
Dude how old skool are you, actual facts? Don't you know such things are now obsolete in this crumbling realm?
If I can educate some of those misled then I'm happy to spend the time. As for those that don't want to know, I despair on such an important issue.
 

trash80

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2015
Messages
1,204
Location
Birches Green
They don't need facts and knowledge, passion and patriotism is all they need apparently. I hope none of them are medical personnel.
 

Puffing Devil

Established Member
Joined
11 Apr 2013
Messages
2,775
May had no chance of getting a good deal for the UK, if we got a good deal other EU countries would want to follow us. She can not please both sides of the debate, there is no compromise between in and out. Democracy has dictated the majority of people who voted want out. A no deal will have a bigger negative effect on the EU than us. In the short term we will have a rough ride but long term the whole of the UK will be better off.
Lets get on with the preparation for a no deal and start and talk to the rest of the world. My recent big worry is the European army proposal. The head of a country has the say if we go to war, a European army would be manged by an un-elected head, and we would have no say, or recon-pence of being able to vote them out, as we did with Blair. Just look at what the European courts have done to us, we can not kick the bad boys out of the UK, as they are entitled to a family life.
If we do not leave with a good deal or a no deal, the Tories will split and UKIP will become the third elected party. Please before any criticism of UKIP read what other polices they would support.

You clearly have no idea about the complexities of world trade, or even our obligations under NATO.

We're still waiting for an answer to the question from the discussion below. I won't hold my breath, you probably learned the same time as Raab about the importance of Dover.......

What's this scaremongering about? Think positive, we can have south African fruit. Brazilian beef, New Zealand lamb, Korean cars, all cheaper, list can go on and on. The Spanish salad growers, the dutch flower growers, Belgian chocolate makers, German/French car makers will all go bankrupt. All because we can get the same or similar products/produce from other sources. The EU has a lot more to lose than the UK, Mrs May should say 'THAT'S ENOUGH WHEN YOU WANT A TRADE DEAL WITH US MY DOOR IS OPEN WHEN YOU MAKE AN APPOINTMENT' If the country/politicians had got behind our government it would have been sorted by now.

As you're clearly an expert on World Trade, perhaps you could give us your thought through take on this commentary of our trading status post Brexit?

https://www.docdroid.net/m3YvOS5/brexit-truth-revised.pdf

You may even give your considered opinion on the recent Russian led veto of our proposals to the WTO.
 

fowler9

Established Member
Joined
29 Oct 2013
Messages
8,371
Location
Liverpool
Looks to me like we are going to end up with either a deal worse than we already had or no deal and some nightmare like Rees-Mogg in charge. I'm kind of swapping between holding my head in my hands and then laughing. Ha ha. What an absolute mess. I really don't recall that many people being that up in arms about the EU before Cameron opened Pandoras Box.
 

Basher

Member
Joined
6 Oct 2017
Messages
333
It's strange how some people have a go at UKIP, but the membership is on the increase again. There was a lot of voters voted for them.
As soon as some people here the word UKIP they call them racist fanatics, its usually the woolly left who have to take a lot of the responsibility for this fast becoming a broken society.
 

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
14,296
Location
St Albans
You missed the bit about uk only exporting 44% of its goods to the EU. Down from about 55% 20 years ago
What's that got to do with the risk on the 44%?
Still, just keep on consoling yourself with all that contol over the pennies that you'll have. What a bargain! :)
 

fowler9

Established Member
Joined
29 Oct 2013
Messages
8,371
Location
Liverpool
It's strange how some people have a go at UKIP, but the membership is on the increase again. There was a lot of voters voted for them.
As soon as some people here the word UKIP they call them racist fanatics, its usually the woolly left who have to take a lot of the responsibility for this fast becoming a broken society.
Why do the left usually have to take a lot of responsibility?
 

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,215
Looking at the news today; still baffled by why Rees-Mogg gets the amout dispropportionate of airtime that he does.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top