I fully agree.To be honest, what @43066 is saying is a theme I view in Manchester. I work across offices in the City, Manc, Brum, Leeds & Edinburgh and the culture of face-to-face meetings can’t be underestimated. There will be a compromise though. It will never be 5 days per week, but it hasn’t been that way for years. It will also not be 2 days per week either.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
TYElection is first week of May, so 1-2 weeks before the timetable change. However, service changes would be visible before that in journey planners, and publicity would be active before May to warn people where trains have changed.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
Agreed.For sure there’s a hell of a lot of working from home which *isn’t* able to achieve normal productivity.
Back in January I requested a specialist CCTV download relating to a potentially rather serious train door incident. It’s only just arrived, as the contractor concerned has only just returned to work as of this week.
It’s the same with numerous processes at my place, they’re either taking far longer than usual, or can’t be done - and the standard reason is that key people are WFH.
I’m sure there’s plenty of people who are able to do their full workload at home. But for every one of those I bet there’s another who is currently at home and only carrying out those elements of work which are practicable to do at home, and hoping they can permanently shelve the remaining elements of work.
Businesses may be quite happy to equip someone with a laptop and Zoom, however once it becomes necessary to utilise more specialist equipment the benefits of WFH quickly disappear.
In the medium term I don’t think it will catch on quite as much as people think.