• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

December 2021 Timetable change

Status
Not open for further replies.

JRT

Member
Joined
11 Nov 2020
Messages
355
Location
Bradford
But what's the point? Does it cost more to go on Gatex from Brighton to Gatwick or Victoria? If not then there's no revenue gain for the railway. Fewer trains at Haywards Heath might actually reduce revenue slightly. Genuinely baffled.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==


People do make strange decisions. I recall people wedging onto a full class 144 at Skipton rather than take an empty class 333 that originated there a few minutes later. In that example, the Pacer was a few minutes faster than the 333 so there is some logic.
08:04 arr. 08:41
08:09 arr. 08:54½ current timings.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Kite159

Veteran Member
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
20,820
Location
West of Andover
Removal of the Southern branded fast service at Haywards Heath might reduce the revenue as passengers could go "we can save money by buying Thameslink only fares to travel to London Bridge/Blackfriars".

Most passengers will look at journey planners, if the first service gets overtaken along the way (ie Brighton to London by getting overtaken at Three Bridges) they could ignore it and go for the faster train.
 

infobleep

On Moderation
Joined
27 Feb 2011
Messages
13,438
Removal of the Southern branded fast service at Haywards Heath might reduce the revenue as passengers could go "we can save money by buying Thameslink only fares to travel to London Bridge/Blackfriars".

Most passengers will look at journey planners, if the first service gets overtaken along the way (ie Brighton to London by getting overtaken at Three Bridges) they could ignore it and go for the faster train.
There are hashish services from -Haywards Heath that come from Eastbourne and Littlehampton.

However, they also stop at East Croydon and Clapham Junction.

I hadn't thought about the possibility of passengers from Haywards Heath being put off by not being able to get a train that doesn't stop at Clapham Junction and East Croydon.

Would that be greater than the number of passengers put off at Brighton? Would any modelling be done on this?
 

AlbertBeale

Established Member
Joined
16 Jun 2019
Messages
3,188
Location
London
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Darn the autocorrect typo I didn't notice.

It should have been fastish services, which nt autocorrect thinks should be hashish.

Remembering my student days in Brighton, I'd say that the autocorrect had it spot on for the Brighton-London line...
 

30907

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
20,774
Location
Airedale
During the morning peak going north and evening peak south, the trains do stop at Haywards Heath. Are Brighton passengers suddenly not opt off travelling because it is the peak rush hour time period?
Yes, because the faster the train, the more people will travel.
But - the demand from the inland dormitory towns is a significantly higher part of the total at commuting times and (a) they need providing for and (b) they bring in more money than is lost by making the extra stop(s).
The minimum-stop Brighton train has been off-peak only since at least the 1967 timetable rewrite.
 

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
18,832
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
Yes, because the faster the train, the more people will travel.
But - the demand from the inland dormitory towns is a significantly higher part of the total at commuting times and (a) they need providing for and (b) they bring in more money than is lost by making the extra stop(s).
The minimum-stop Brighton train has been off-peak only since at least the 1967 timetable rewrite.

Exactly the same with Cambridge. Off-peak non-stop trains to/from London since the 1990s, however peak trains tend to have additional calls at Letchworth and Royston (plus briefly the odd case of Ashwell & Morden!). As well as being lucrative, these locations have influential local rail user groups.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
41,847
Location
Yorks
I thought we were supposed to be getting an hourly service to the Hope Valley stations ?

Still showing a stupid gap in the middle of the day at Edale !
 

infobleep

On Moderation
Joined
27 Feb 2011
Messages
13,438
Remind me not to buy a second-hand phone off you :D
Well, I was advised by a forum member on here to use Grammarly as it has a spell checker on the Android keyboard. Alas, it doesn't have the ability to remember what you asked it to correct to previously and its initial suggestions sent are good as some other Android keyboard.

Can't have it all.

As for fast limited stop trains to London, once upon a time trains didn't stop at Gatwick Airport and ran non-stop from Brighton.

Times change though. So will modelling have been done to show that stopping at Haywards Heath off-peak will reduce passenger numbers overall or revenue overall? It's possible to have fewer passengers and higher revenue and that being considered more important.
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
21,359
As for fast limited stop trains to London, once upon a time trains didn't stop at Gatwick Airport and ran non-stop from Brighton.
Yes, Brighton non stop from Victoria originally, then East Croydon inserted. Clapham Junction followed with the 377s. Then amalgamated with Gatwick Express at which point the Brighton fast stopped only at Gatwick Airport.

The pertinent issue being that it is only possible to run a 'fast' every half hour from Brighton.
 

infobleep

On Moderation
Joined
27 Feb 2011
Messages
13,438
Yes, Brighton non stop from Victoria originally, then East Croydon inserted. Clapham Junction followed with the 377s. Then amalgamated with Gatwick Express at which point the Brighton fast stopped only at Gatwick Airport.

The pertinent issue being that it is only possible to run a 'fast' every half hour from Brighton.
So will they have modelling to show that:
Brighton -> Gatwick Airport -> London Victoria brings in more revenue than Brighton -> East Croydon -> Clapham Junction -> London Victoria or Brighton -> Haywards Heath -> Gatwick Airport -> London Victoria?

Fewer people are travelling from Gatwick Airport currently, so that must be bringing in less revenue. If they weren't then the Southern terminal would be operating.
 

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
25,332
Location
Bolton
Yes, because the faster the train, the more people will travel.
But - the demand from the inland dormitory towns is a significantly higher part of the total at commuting times and (a) they need providing for and (b) they bring in more money than is lost by making the extra stop(s).
The minimum-stop Brighton train has been off-peak only since at least the 1967 timetable rewrite.
I thought we'd established there wasn't any journey time improvement?
 

Bikeman78

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2018
Messages
5,473
Yes, because the faster the train, the more people will travel.
But - the demand from the inland dormitory towns is a significantly higher part of the total at commuting times and (a) they need providing for and (b) they bring in more money than is lost by making the extra stop(s).
The minimum-stop Brighton train has been off-peak only since at least the 1967 timetable rewrite.
Back in the 1990s the Brighton fast had a decent path and ran non stop to East Croydon heading up. I remember the first time I went on one it seemed to be doing warp speed compared with the other trains. Flying through Gatwick at 80+ mph was amazing.

This video from 1996 shows one passing in the down direction around the 45 second mark.

 

Jamesrob637

Established Member
Joined
12 Aug 2016
Messages
5,674
What's happened to the Liverpool to Norwich? The 10:50 from Liverpool isn't on RTT at Stockport. I know (if not appreciate) that the 08:50 doesn't run until next year however I thought that was the only gap since Monday.
 

43055

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2018
Messages
3,350
What's happened to the Liverpool to Norwich? The 10:50 from Liverpool isn't on RTT at Stockport. I know (if not appreciate) that the 08:50 doesn't run until next year however I thought that was the only gap since Monday.
Some services are coming back from the 3rd Jan not at the timetable change.
 

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
25,332
Location
Bolton
What's happened to the Liverpool to Norwich? The 10:50 from Liverpool isn't on RTT at Stockport. I know (if not appreciate) that the 08:50 doesn't run until next year however I thought that was the only gap since Monday.
The following services will be reinstated on Monday 3rd January 2022

0647 Liverpool Lime Street to Nottingham
1051 Liverpool Lime Street to Nottingham
0747 Nottingham to Liverpool Lime Street
1057 Norwich to Liverpool Liverpool Lime Street (between Nottingham & Liverpool)
 

Watershed

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
26 Sep 2020
Messages
14,268
Location
UK
Some timetables are being reduced again from next week.
Which ones have you seen mentioned in this context? (I have my suspicions, but...)
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
18,058
Location
East Anglia
Which ones have you seen mentioned in this context? (I have my suspicions, but...)
Just been told our rosters for next week are being delayed (should be posted this afternoon) as due to the current Covid situation services are being reduced from Monday. Not looking like a very merry Christmas except for those traincrew who might get their leave granted rather than declined now depending on how severe the reductions are.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top