There's some in service with ETCS isolated.What are the Cambrian units currently doing, are they stored or in use on other routes?
Apologies if it's been covered on one of the other 275 pages!![]()
There's some in service with ETCS isolated.What are the Cambrian units currently doing, are they stored or in use on other routes?
Apologies if it's been covered on one of the other 275 pages!![]()
What @12guard4 said. Specifically, 4 ETCS-fitted 197s (197003, 197030, 197031 and 197033) have been in service "off-Cambrian" (with their ETCS isolated), so 58 197s have been in service so far (54 of the 56 non-ETCS 197s - that is all of those except 197123 and 197126 - plus the 4 aforementioned ETCS-fitted 197s), although 197033 has since been 2 of the 7 cars of the 14/1/25 Shrewsbury-Birmingham 197 test runs.What are the Cambrian units currently doing, are they stored or in use on other routes?
Apologies if it's been covered on one of the other 275 pages!![]()
Are there likely to be more Cambrian units pressed into service?What @12guard4 said. Specifically, 4 ETCS-fitted 197s (197003, 197030, 197031 and 197033) have been in service "off-Cambrian" (with their ETCS isolated), so 58 197s have been in service so far (54 of the 56 non-ETCS 197s - that is all of those except 197123 and 197126 - plus the 4 aforementioned ETCS-fitted 197s), although 197033 has since been 2 of the 7 cars of the 14/1/25 Shrewsbury-Birmingham 197 test runs.
I saw one passing Chester a few nights ago still with the plastic bags over the seats and the banners across the doors saying do not board, testing or something. Presumably doing fault free mileage, didn't catch the number though.Are there likely to be more Cambrian units pressed into service?
Will there be enough ETCS fitted 197s to allow inter-working on non-Cambrian duties to North and South Wales ?.Unless they are planning to put 6-car trains on most of their Birmingham services (allowing a non-ETCS unit to/from Wrexham etc. to join/split at Shrewsbury) or remove through workings to/from Birmingham for either the Cambrian or Wrexham then I would expect the Cambrian will continue to interwork with Birmingham-Wrexham-Chester-Llandudno/Holyhead. In the latter case, I would expect you would eventually pick up most of ERTMS/ETCS fitted units in Chester, the exception being anything running even-hour Aberystwyth-Shrewsbury shuttles.
And just today 197123 appears to have gone into use.What @12guard4 said. Specifically, 4 ETCS-fitted 197s (197003, 197030, 197031 and 197033) have been in service "off-Cambrian" (with their ETCS isolated), so 58 197s have been in service so far (54 of the 56 non-ETCS 197s - that is all of those except 197123 and 197126 - plus the 4 aforementioned ETCS-fitted 197s), although 197033 has since been 2 of the 7 cars of the 14/1/25 Shrewsbury-Birmingham 197 test runs.
Can confirm today's 3Z11 from Shrewsbury to Birmingham International is 197033, 197047 and 197123. I saw then at Telford Central. Photos to follow soon.
Interworking with Holyhead, yes. Anything heading South from Sutton Brisge Junction however, or going to Manchester (via either route) is likely tobe either the odd token diagram or some on-the-day allocations by Control if the conventional fleet is shortWill there be enough ETCS fitted 197s to allow inter-working on non-Cambrian duties to North and South Wales ?.
Thats good news and if 197123 is in service soon too that will certainly help the shortage of units.197034 has entered service today on Bidstons. It’s then swapping in to 1W26 at Shrewsbury to end at Crewe replacing 197102.
Does it? If the unit shortage is down to a maintenance backlog, surely these 197s will simply add to that backlog when they inevitably gain faults, and they'll be back to the current availability?Thats good news and if 197123 is in service soon too that will certainly help the shortage of units.
They buy a bit of time.Does it? If the unit shortage is down to a maintenance backlog, surely these 197s will simply add to that backlog when they inevitably gain faults, and they'll be back to the current availability?
I'm wondering if there was some faulty caps hence the need for it to be so long.Here are my follow up photos
Testing, Testing 1,2,3...
TFW Class 197033, 197047 and 197123 working 3Z11 (Shrewsbury Abbey Forgate - Birmingham International) stop at Telford Central with pretend passengers and staff testing out the train equipment before they enter service on the Salop line. An unusual 7 car formation as well. (14/1/25)
How soon are they expected to start in passenger service on Shrewsbury-Birmingham? Given the train crew that sign this route should already be trained on 197s.Here are my follow up photos
Testing, Testing 1,2,3...
TFW Class 197033, 197047 and 197123 working 3Z11 (Shrewsbury Abbey Forgate - Birmingham International) stop at Telford Central with pretend passengers and staff testing out the train equipment before they enter service on the Salop line. An unusual 7 car formation as well. (14/1/25)
AFAIK Machynlleth guards sign SHR-BHI, but don't currently sign anything other than 158's.How soon are they expected to start in passenger service on Shrewsbury-Birmingham? Given the train crew that sign this route should already be trained on 197s.
It'll give Control more options when short of 158s. There may be the odd STP diagram which set swaps on the way back from Birmingham, rather than on the way there. We'll seeGiven the first two points above, I'd guess that it's unlikely (although certainly not impossible) to see 197s in passenger service on the line until the ETCS units start entering service on the Cambrian.
Exactly, it would be sensible to do that in much the same way you used to get the occasional 175 sub back in the day - having options is good.It'll give Control more options when short of 158s. There may be the odd STP diagram which set swaps on the way back from Birmingham, rather than on the way there. We'll see
I believe one or two trains (one AM peak and one PM peak I think) will be booked 7 car 197 eventually so they’ll be testing as a 7 as the maximum permitted formationI'm wondering if there was some faulty caps hence the need for it to be so long.
There was always a plan to do long formation testing as it gives options. The main stops TfW stops at are mostly long anyway anf its a very busy route so being able to put them as 7s on busy services will be a help.I'm wondering if there was some faulty caps hence the need for it to be so long.
It'll give Control more options when short of 158s. There may be the odd STP diagram which set swaps on the way back from Birmingham, rather than on the way there. We'll see
Exactly, it would be sensible to do that in much the same way you used to get the occasional 175 sub back in the day - having options is good.
We'll know if it's planned on being a regular thing as even with ASDO 7 car sets won't be able to call at Wellington heading towards Birmingham.I believe one or two trains (one AM peak and one PM peak I think) will be booked 7 car 197 eventually so they’ll be testing as a 7 as the maximum permitted formation
Why's that? It looks like there are points behind and a signal in front but could they not overshoot by a carriage to clear the points and then not open the front 2 or 3 door sets? It doesn't look like many trains (if any) get overtaken there.We'll know if it's planned on being a regular thing as even with ASDO 7 car sets won't be able to call at Wellington heading towards Birmingham.
Hopefully summer timetable change.How soon are they expected to start in passenger service on Shrewsbury-Birmingham? Given the train crew that sign this route should already be trained on 197s.
It seems they have got around the issue of a Sprinter covering a service that is meant to divide at Swansea. The 1130 Manchester to Milford Haven is formed of 2 x 2 car 197 and will be replaced at Swansea with a Sprinter (in this case a 158) when usually it would be Cardiff where a swap would take place.
I don't know for certain, but I would assume it's not permissable to have a stop car marker beyond a start signal, and if you don't go past it you'll end up with the rear overhanging the points.Why's that? It looks like there are points behind and a signal in front but could they not overshoot by a carriage to clear the points and then not open the front 2 or 3 door sets? It doesn't look like many trains (if any) get overtaken there.
Yes, subject to funding being available (which should give you an idea of how likely it is)Is there any option for TFW to order more units if needed-or extra carriages?
Lol yeah very trueYes, subject to funding being available (which should give you an idea of how likely it is)
When Talerddig happened and quite a bad availability of 158's during winter, the clearance of the Birmingham route was brought forward to create more flexibility in using 197's. I've noticed a lot of swaps at Shrewsbury in the past few months. Not great for passengers.Given the first two points above, I'd guess that it's unlikely (although certainly not impossible) to see 197s in passenger service on the line until the ETCS units start entering service on the Cambrian
I can't see TFW taking on anymore 197's as there's an already well discussed issue of CAF not having the capacity to maintain them. Once the whole TFW fleet is bedded in then it's unlikely TFW will need anymore units.Is there any option for TFW to order more units if needed-or extra carriages?