I've read this thread end to end, fascinating! Who'd have thought the thread on here that I'd devote the most time to would be one which has naff all to do with trains!
Thanks to all those with creepy tales, provided some very interesting late-night reading!
I'm strictly on the fence with all of this stuff, I'd have to see something myself I think to truly believe it. However, I'm hoping to love a happy life without ever doing so, as I know without a doubt I'd be scared witless if I ever did!
One obvious point which crops up in the non-believer camp, is how very convenient the 'no proof' argument is. What form of evidence I wonder would actually be accepted as the magical 'proof' that is so often said to be lacking? Certainly nothing so mundane as a photograph or video; with the digital cameras and computer editing readily available now, you could have the most genuine video or pic in the world and it would immediately be discounted as a hoax. Movies and SFX have numbed our senses to the point where anything which can't be reasonably explained must obviously be the work of a computer! Shame really. How about scientific evidence then? People with lots of gadgetry tell us they have recorded strange atmospheric goings on, like temperatures fluctuating and energy levels going up the wall etc, but again it is immediately explained away as being possibly this or that or the other. It quickly becomes clear that the only evidence many sceptics would truly accept is if a ghosty chap, head firmly tucked under his arm, popped through the nearest wall and said Boo! I guess with that in mind, this is one debate that will rage forever!