Deepgreen
Established Member
It would have been in traditional yellow London brick. The colour of the original viaduct is almost black after hundred+ years of polution. I think it is nice that NR have realised the heritage of the viaduct and have faced the new section in London brick but surely it added unnecessary cost and time to the project? The brick appears to be purely cosmetic unless anyone knows different.
With all respect to Millwall supporters & Bermondsey residents it is hardly in a scenic area being sandwiched between the New Den, a recyling centre, railway lines and a post industrial wasteland!
If you want to see a great example of what restored London brick looks like compared to ones stained by years of polution then take a look at the building sandwiched between the new Borough market jct overbridge and the original. It was restored last year and all the original brick completely cleaned except for the side which was too close to the original line for the contractor to work on.
Efforts to blend new and old shouldn't be restricted to Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty. I imagine the cost of the bricks was tiny compared to the overall scheme, the time spent would also be minimal (and would have been done in parallel with other activities, thus not lengthening the overall programme) and NR is right to recognise heritage, albeit with a modern structure. Of course, cleaning the old brickwork to match the new would be the best way to give the full effect.