Class 345 progress

Discussion in 'Traction & Rolling Stock' started by samuelmorris, 2 Sep 2015.

  1. Snow1964

    Snow1964 Member

    Messages:
    217
    Joined:
    7 Oct 2019
    Location:
    Kingston upon Thames
    As I understand it (and it depends on software reliability and certification), plan is to operate the West side services as 9car, the last TfL Board papers I read suggested a target of Mar-Apr 2020

    The 315s are needed for the transition whilst Liverpool Street platforms 16-18 cannot take longer trains. I am not aware of any physical reason why they could not be parked in the sidings instead of 345s until this transition period starts, but maybe something in leasing arrangements is stopping a temporary substitution to 345s. Probably need to keep at least one pair of 315s in use to avoid staff lapsing on type training.

    It appears the (revised) plan is to instigate the Stratford-Whitechapel section with summer timetable change and the Paddington connection 6 months later with December timetable change. Obviously the tunnel section is self contained so can start any date. I'm not clear why it needs to match National timetable change dates unless the Eastern and Western services are not currently operating to the through timings at the local stations (which I find hard to believe in West as virtually every train changed times in December 2019, although I could understand East timings not being final)
     
    Last edited: 20 Jan 2020
  2. hwl

    hwl Established Member

    Messages:
    5,047
    Joined:
    5 Feb 2012
    After Abbey Wood - Paddington start 4 (bare min.) - 6months needed to:
    - bed core section including stations, staff and any snagging/changes in the light of experience
    - after things have started to settle in more GEML driver training in core (Shenfield services effectively never go west of Paddington apart from a few per day...)

    Hence it roughly but doesn't necessarily need to align with the May 2021 TT change due to min. 4m gap.


    Everything is effectively right shifted by 2.5 years

    Phase 3 Abbey Wood - Paddington ~"May" 2021
    Phase 4 Shenfield - Paddington December 2021
    Phase 5B "through Paddington" May 2022
     
  3. Trailfinder

    Trailfinder Member

    Messages:
    66
    Joined:
    15 Jan 2015
    For the last two Sundays, a unit has been shuttling to and fro between the Crossrail Depot Line at Ladbroke Grove and the Royal Oak portal. I guess they are testing the transition between CBTC and TPWS.
    On Open Train Times, berths on the adjacent lines 5 and 6 are showing SPZ (Signalling Protected Zone ?).
     
  4. swt_passenger

    swt_passenger Veteran Member

    Messages:
    21,766
    Joined:
    7 Apr 2010
    Something I don’t recall being mentioned. Are the Heathrow T2/3 and T4 platforms still slightly shorter than a 9 car 345? 195m as opposed to 217m at T5, according to the online sectional appendix.

    Is this going to be dealt with by ASDO, or can the trains stop with both cabs off the platform ends?
     
  5. StewLane

    StewLane Member

    Messages:
    6
    Joined:
    2 May 2017
    Saw a class 345 vehicle on the back of a lorry heading north on M1 after junction 25 around lunchtime. As I was driving I could not take the number.
    Any idea why it should be heading north and not south?
     
  6. hwl

    hwl Established Member

    Messages:
    5,047
    Joined:
    5 Feb 2012
    Probably spare 8th + 9th cars heading for storage at Worksop (with lots of others)
     
  7. Peter Bonner

    Peter Bonner Member

    Messages:
    146
    Joined:
    7 Nov 2019
    Location:
    BEVERLEY
    Probably its on its way to Worksop. Wd love to have full list of the 2 car sections stored there. Saw a few there in mid Nov so guess there are more there now.
     
  8. goldenarrow

    goldenarrow Member

    Messages:
    21
    Joined:
    28 Sep 2019
    Location:
    City of London
    Leading cabs will stop in the tunnel from the passenger perspective as all HEX and XR services do at the moment. The ramp is actually quite a bit further away, it's just hidden by a false headwall with OPO monitors behind that too.

    Tolerances for the 332's operating in nine car formation are close to 200m with no SDO so I think the 345's will be fine, the tests I've witnessed personally were all non-stoppers at 2&3 so can't comment definitively.
     
  9. swt_passenger

    swt_passenger Veteran Member

    Messages:
    21,766
    Joined:
    7 Apr 2010
    Thanks for the detailed reply.
     
  10. kevin_roche

    kevin_roche Member

    Messages:
    398
    Joined:
    26 Feb 2019
    Heathrow trips require ETCS as the 345s don't have the GW-ATP. I think the current configuration of 7 car units don't have ETCS available. I saw a mention by Mark Wild that the transitions between ETCS and TPWS were working. I think there is a need to prove the latest software version before they run 345 full length units to Heathrow. Its likely they will run them on the Hayes service for a while off peak to ensure they work before they risk them on the Heathrow service.
     
  11. rebmcr

    rebmcr Established Member

    Messages:
    2,975
    Joined:
    15 Nov 2011
    Location:
    Cambridge
    It seems all of the other 'blockers' are slowly trickling away, leaving the features of that software release as the only major holdup.

    I reckon we'll see a lot of progress all across the project once it's validated and deployed.
     
  12. hwl

    hwl Established Member

    Messages:
    5,047
    Joined:
    5 Feb 2012
    I suspect the software will get addressed in several phases, so several smaller big wins rather than single huge one.
     
  13. rebmcr

    rebmcr Established Member

    Messages:
    2,975
    Joined:
    15 Nov 2011
    Location:
    Cambridge
    That's plausible, but I think there's also merit in not having to re-validate the modules against each other when new pieces are added. The latter approach would of course probably require a greater number of bugfix releases after it goes live.
     
  14. kevin_roche

    kevin_roche Member

    Messages:
    398
    Joined:
    26 Feb 2019
    There are at least two versions of the the software being worked on that I know about, PD+11 and PD+12, and there will be more if further faults are found while trial running. These appear to be the Configuration numbers and include software from Bombardier and Siemens. They are mentioned in the Jacobs reports for period 6 and 7 which you can find on the TfL website. The reports also mention what I think are Bombardier software versions, Y0.50 and Z1.00.

    In the Period 6 Report: http://content.tfl.gov.uk/project-representative-periodic-reports-period-6-2019.pdf (see page 6 and 12)

    and
    In the Period 7 Report: http://content.tfl.gov.uk/project-representative-periodic-report-period-7-2019.pdf (see page 9 and 10)

    In Crossrail Limited's response to the Jacobs Report for period 7:
    http://content.tfl.gov.uk/project-representative-crossrail-response-to-sponsors-period-7-2019.pdf
    on page 6 it says:
    I hope that helps. I know this is old news now but if the project is going as was expected they should be about to install P_D11+ and P-D12+ will be under test at Melton soon.
     
  15. hwl

    hwl Established Member

    Messages:
    5,047
    Joined:
    5 Feb 2012
    I was just referring to the train software. Plenty of issues that aren't related hence ideal to separate (providing for proper regression testing) especially given the bonus of 9car + Heathrow running in the short term that doesn't have a Siemens CBTC software link which will also help run more 345s in service, get the 9cars in service and gets more units accumulate mileage and resolve issues helping in the long term. It also means no more 360 running for TfLrail making things slightly more simple in the medium term.
     
  16. kevin_roche

    kevin_roche Member

    Messages:
    398
    Joined:
    26 Feb 2019
    Unfortunately the train software and signalling software versions are not separated in the Jacobs reports. Originally in some of the earlier reports the various versions were, now its difficult to separate them out. I assume that these numbers are not referring to the trackside signalling software, but I'm not sure.

    In a report from over a year ago I saw version numbers for the TCMS (Train Control and Management System) [7.2.2.6 and 7.3], the TPWS software [2.5.2], the ETCS software [PVI 6.2] and CBTC [A03-003] but now they refer to the whole lot together with numbers like PD+11 but they are not very consistent. I'm guessing that the CBTC software is there but inactive on a trip from Paddington High Level to Heathrow.
     
  17. kevin_roche

    kevin_roche Member

    Messages:
    398
    Joined:
    26 Feb 2019
    Some good news from the TfL board meeting today.

    https://www.london.gov.uk/tfl-full-board-2020-01-22

     
  18. pacenotes

    pacenotes Member

    Messages:
    85
    Joined:
    4 Mar 2017
    So having used the 345 for just over a month on the western side, They are bedding in ok. I think people have found when the trains are a bit quieter and got there favorite seats.

    The only thing I have to say is how little bar holding space there is.

    In front of the doors is a single pole. They could of put a 3 bar pole to alow more holding space like the new Merseyside rail

    [​IMG]

    On that, once you get inside and down the carriage there is also nothing to hold on to except the top straps which if you are short is imposable. Even the forward-facing seats don't have a bar like the train above. Since they said most journeys are 10 mins or less and most will be standing its not a great train for standing in.
     
  19. D365

    D365 Established Member

    Messages:
    6,725
    Joined:
    29 Jun 2012
  20. hwl

    hwl Established Member

    Messages:
    5,047
    Joined:
    5 Feb 2012
    The target in November was for April so it look like this is on target. Expect to see phasing with Hayes shuttles + Reading first to avoid teething troubles in the Heathrow tunnels section. Heathrow may even be in 2 phases with the 360 replacement first then Hayes extensions (the later to align with May TT change to make life simpler overall?)
     
  21. kevin_roche

    kevin_roche Member

    Messages:
    398
    Joined:
    26 Feb 2019
    There was a statement at the meeting that the constraint for Heathrow was driver training. They thought that would be complete by March. So April looks good.
     
  22. rebmcr

    rebmcr Established Member

    Messages:
    2,975
    Joined:
    15 Nov 2011
    Location:
    Cambridge
    Assuming, of course, that PD+11 tests go well.
     
  23. hwl

    hwl Established Member

    Messages:
    5,047
    Joined:
    5 Feb 2012
    PD+11 is the related to central tunnelled section CBTC signalling not the trains to Heathrow or 9 car...
     
  24. kevin_roche

    kevin_roche Member

    Messages:
    398
    Joined:
    26 Feb 2019
    That is not what they said at the TfL board meeting. They specifically said they would use PD+11 on the trains to Heathrow. Mark Wild made a point that they would be using the same version of software on all the 9 car trains. Unfortunately the stream won't play right now so I can't point you at the specific words.

    I believe they are using the PD+11 version number for the integrated software which supports ETCS, CBTC and TPWS.
     
    Last edited: 24 Jan 2020
  25. class717

    class717 Member

    Messages:
    34
    Joined:
    23 Oct 2019
    Location:
    Enfield
    Just saw an empty 345 going over the Heathrow flyover just outside Hayes and Harlington. Can't find on RTT but comes up at 516I on Open Train Times. Didn't know they did testing on weekends?
     
  26. JonathanH

    JonathanH Established Member

    Messages:
    3,685
    Joined:
    29 May 2011
    They were at Heathrow testing last weekend as well as I posted here https://www.railforums.co.uk/threads/class-345-progress.120221/page-104#post-4394385

    The testing seems quite intensive today
    https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/se...5/0200-0159?stp=WVS&show=all&order=wtt&toc=ZZ

    The unit in appears to have run under the XR code
    https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/K00105/2020-01-25/detailed
     
  27. Bigbru

    Bigbru Member

    Messages:
    16
    Joined:
    4 Jun 2017
  28. itfcfan

    itfcfan Member

    Messages:
    231
    Joined:
    7 May 2011
    Looking at Real Time Trains after the May timetable change and it appears 4tph Paddington to Heathrow (non-Heathrow Express) is planned to begin then (on Monday 18th May). Given there's not sufficient availability of class 360 trains to run 4tph to Heathrow, it seems likely that class 345 to Heathrow is planned for that date.

    Monday 18th May 2020 - 4tph Heathrow Central -> Ealing Broadway (xx:11, xx:26, xx:41, xx:56)
    https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/se...8/1000-1100?stp=WVS&show=all&order=wtt&toc=XR

    Friday 15th May - 2tph Heathrow Central -> Ealing Broadway (xx:26, xx:56)
    https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/se...5/1000-1100?stp=WVS&show=all&order=wtt&toc=XR
     
  29. kevin_roche

    kevin_roche Member

    Messages:
    398
    Joined:
    26 Feb 2019
    Yes the plan is that the current trains which stop at Hayes and Harlington will continue to Heathrow.

    You can see that by looking at the reverse direction:

    Friday 15th May 2020 From Paddington
    https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/se...5/1000-1100?stp=WVS&show=all&order=wtt&toc=XR

    Monday 18th May 2020 From Paddington
    https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/se...8/1000-1100?stp=WVS&show=all&order=wtt&toc=XR
     
  30. kevin_roche

    kevin_roche Member

    Messages:
    398
    Joined:
    26 Feb 2019
    The minutes from the November Crossrail board meeting are now on the TfL web site: http://content.tfl.gov.uk/crl-board-minutes-7-november-2019.pdf
    One interesting point was the answer to my earlier question about the length of trial running:
    Am I correct to assume that, given that Trial Running will start in the Autumn 2020, it will be followed by operational testing which is likely to take us through to the summer of 2021 (May?), a period of about 5 months?
     

Share This Page