• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Class 442s - Now at the end of the road and to be withdrawn permanently

Status
Not open for further replies.

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
32,940
I wondered about that as well, but apparently those two units (2401 and 2417) are now off-lease and Eastbourne Sidings has a spare berth, hence why they're being stored there for the time being.

It would've been sensible for GTR to have kept a couple of spare 442s with them for this sort of issue. But, GTR is GTR...no hope! :roll:

A couple of units to support four in service ( as has been described already) would normally considered quite reasonable. Most EMU fleet managers would expect to run at something like 85-90% utilisation. Someone even posted that they thought there'd be 8 units to cover 4 in service each day, and I think that would be incredibly unlikely.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

RichardKing

Member
Joined
25 Jul 2015
Messages
565
A couple of units to support four in service ( as has been described already) would normally considered quite reasonable. Most EMU fleet managers would expect to run at something like 85-90% utilisation. Someone even posted that they thought there'd be 8 units to cover 4 in service each day, and I think that would be incredibly unlikely.

To be honest, I thought there was a plan to keep 6 units (2 for the Eastbourne service, 2 for the Brighton services and 2 spare).

Yeah, retaining 8 units is very unlikely!
 

spark001uk

Established Member
Joined
20 Aug 2010
Messages
2,356
I wondered about that as well, but apparently those two units (2401 and 2417) are now off-lease and Eastbourne Sidings has a spare berth, hence why they're being stored there for the time being.

It would've been sensible for GTR to have kept a couple of spare 442s with them for this sort of issue. But, GTR is GTR...no hope! :roll:

They should preserve 2401 (or one end at least), as it's the 3rd rail speed record holder.
2417 has history too, if it weren't for vandals derailing it the night before, it would've formed the service involved in the Clapham crash. Mind you, better crashworthiness may well have afforded less fatalities. That is if it were even involved, it may have run several minutes early (or late), and missed it, I guess we'll never know.
 
Joined
9 Apr 2016
Messages
1,909
What allocated 442? It isn't booked for a 442. Monday was the first day of full 387/2 usage so of the diagrams I gave, only the two that goes to/from Eastbourne are booked 442 now.

Ok. Thanks for the info. I didnt realise. So was Friday (16/9/2016) the last day of a 442 on this diagram?
 

MrB

Member
Joined
3 Jan 2016
Messages
388
Location
London
I wondered about that as well, but apparently those two units (2401 and 2417) are now off-lease and Eastbourne Sidings has a spare berth, hence why they're being stored there for the time being.

It would've been sensible for GTR to have kept a couple of spare 442s with them for this sort of issue. But, GTR is GTR...no hope! :roll:

So GTR have 4 x 442s and need 4 to operate the service?! Surely this is port planning and organisation on their part.
 

Dart34518

Member
Joined
1 Jun 2015
Messages
108
So GTR have 4 x 442s and need 4 to operate the service?! Surely this is port planning and organisation on their part.

GTR is keeping 6 442s.
2,6,8,10,13 & 19.

The 2 at Eastboune will be moved to Three Bridges for futher storage over the next few weeks.

2405 is at Lovers Walk and is also stored out of service.
 

spark001uk

Established Member
Joined
20 Aug 2010
Messages
2,356
GTR is keeping 6 442s.
2,6,8,10,13 & 19.

The 2 at Eastboune will be moved to Three Bridges for futher storage over the next few weeks.

2405 is at Lovers Walk and is also stored out of service.

Any particular logic they've followed for keeping those units? Looking at the HVAC report posted here earlier most of those units have faults so they can't have gone by that? Mind you I suppose there are more important factors they've taken into consideration?
 

neilm

Member
Joined
3 Jan 2012
Messages
499
Any particular logic they've followed for keeping those units? Looking at the HVAC report posted here earlier most of those units have faults so they can't have gone by that? Mind you I suppose there are more important factors they've taken into consideration?
Indeed HVAC seems to be broken on all of them with at least 1 coach, perhaps they are the cheapest to lease for GTR?
 

spark001uk

Established Member
Joined
20 Aug 2010
Messages
2,356
Indeed HVAC seems to be broken on all of them with at least 1 coach, perhaps they are the cheapest to lease for GTR?

Well we had 2415 and 18 on the tour, and the aircon worked beautifully throughout. However those are both bound for Ely! Well one has already gone in fact, 15 I believe.
 

Class377/5

Established Member
Joined
19 Jun 2010
Messages
5,594
Indeed HVAC seems to be broken on all of them with at least 1 coach, perhaps they are the cheapest to lease for GTR?

Or simple fact that they must be given back in working order to avoid a fine so ensuring money is saved with limited resources?
 

neilm

Member
Joined
3 Jan 2012
Messages
499
Or simple fact that they must be given back in working order to avoid a fine so ensuring money is saved with limited resources?
Not sure what you mean, it will only be fixed when they return it? So commuters have two more years with these trains being ran into the ground?
 

Class377/5

Established Member
Joined
19 Jun 2010
Messages
5,594
Not sure what you mean, it will only be fixed when they return it? So commuters have two more years with these trains being ran into the ground?

No its not. You've misunderstood. There is a limited supply of parts so the hardback units will be made good first and then the others secondary. We are talking about a small different measured in days. It's just right now the air con has had a tough summer and the numbers have been agreed last year with dates so it's impossible to change as the 700 owner have made plans accordingly.
 

neilm

Member
Joined
3 Jan 2012
Messages
499
No its not. You've misunderstood. There is a limited supply of parts so the hardback units will be made good first and then the others secondary. We are talking about a small different measured in days. It's just right now the air con has had a tough summer and the numbers have been agreed last year with dates so it's impossible to change as the 700 owner have made plans accordingly.
That all makes sense if with hardback you mean handbake?

And thanks for the reply.
 

SpacePhoenix

Established Member
Joined
18 Mar 2014
Messages
5,491
Is there any point in them being "fixed up" before being returned to the ROSCO as they'll likely all be going to the scrapyard?
 

Domh245

Established Member
Joined
6 Apr 2013
Messages
8,425
Location
nowhere
Is there any point in them being "fixed up" before being returned to the ROSCO as they'll likely all be going to the scrapyard?

Yes, because that is the lease agreement, and otherwise they'd be fined for it (see Northern and their 180s).
 

neilm

Member
Joined
3 Jan 2012
Messages
499
Can you do that on board when the air con fails in summer? [emoji38]

Or if Mary Berry boards?
Tbh sometimes commuters have called it an oven when the AC fails and we know the BBC were looking for a cheaper version, perhaps merry berry does bakes on a 442?
 

spark001uk

Established Member
Joined
20 Aug 2010
Messages
2,356
2412 going the other way now; de-shoed and on its way to Ely. 47812 hauling.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20160923-143727.jpg
    Screenshot_20160923-143727.jpg
    159.5 KB · Views: 75

Bishopstone

Established Member
Joined
24 Jun 2010
Messages
1,574
Location
Seaford
17.57 London Bridge - Brighton short-formed 1x442 vs 2x442.

I assume neither of the spares were available, with (at least) two hours notice.
 

neilm

Member
Joined
3 Jan 2012
Messages
499
17.57 London Bridge - Brighton short-formed 1x442 vs 2x442.

I assume neither of the spares were available, with (at least) two hours notice.
It's been like it all week, I suspect lack of train crew means if it the spare was available they don't have the train crew to bring it in.

All week there have been cancellations across the network and it is going to get worse next week with the Seaford trains running again.
 

sarahj

Established Member
Joined
12 Dec 2012
Messages
1,897
Location
Brighton
It's been like it all week, I suspect lack of train crew means if it the spare was available they don't have the train crew to bring it in.

All week there have been cancellations across the network and it is going to get worse next week with the Seaford trains running again.

You don't have to worry about the Seafords, they are not being crewed by regular staff.

I think that 5 car has been running round all week. It was forming the Ebn to LBG earlier this week.
If there is a spare, its not been coming out to play.
 

Class455

Established Member
Joined
19 May 2016
Messages
1,452
442408 and 442413 were on the Eastbourne-London Bridge service today. I saw them at East Croydon. I suspect these 2 are being retained?
 

BestWestern

Established Member
Joined
6 Feb 2011
Messages
6,736
You don't have to worry about the Seafords, they are not being crewed by regular staff.

I think that 5 car has been running round all week. It was forming the Ebn to LBG earlier this week.
If there is a spare, its not been coming out to play.

Who is crewing them then?! :o
 

broadgage

Member
Joined
11 Aug 2012
Messages
1,094
Location
Somerset
Is there any point in them being "fixed up" before being returned to the ROSCO as they'll likely all be going to the scrapyard?

Not by any common sense standards ! unfortunately however leased assets including trains generally have to be retuned in good working order.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top