The fact that the posting that I was responding to made mention of the fact that the taxpayers were not involved but the "shareholders" which may have led some people not so well versed in this project as your good self to have implied British shareholders.
What "grand scheme of things" do you attach to such a project of this, which anyone with any business acumen would view on the progress and conduct of it so far. The project should only be viewed as any rail unit manufacturing project would be viewed by those charged with the management of same and totally and utterly devoid of any meaningless enthusiast euphoria.
I do love a good rant and that was canny good.
What everyone overlooked right from the start of their project though was that if they had been given support by the Govt as a stop gap measure on certain routes this wouldve released other units to strengthen other services - something that people couldnt get their head round it seems.
I asked many times if people wanted trains and extra capacity now or wait 3 or 4 years of rammed packed commuting till they got new ones?
And do you know who didnt answer? Just about everyone because the sensible answer was 'Capacity now'.
Thats what the whole project was about in my eyes and I struggle to understand why anyone fed up with and moaning about the lack of available trains to transport them to work would be happy to wait nearly 4 years for new trains - thats just too unbelievable to be true.
Hi, is it safe to assume that Class 230 is done for? I do not know about its future amid the cancellation of the trial.
Thankfully us Northern punters will not have to put up with the blessed things. Hopefully other punters across the country will also have the pleasure of never having one rock up, and instead more investment be made in bringing new units and improving the existing units to provide the needed extra capacity.
I hope you prefer your nice view of empty track where the Class 230 would have been, when nothing turns up because the expense of 'modern' stock puts the cosh on any service increases.
I hope you prefer your nice view of empty track where the Class 230 would have been, when nothing turns up because the expense of 'modern' stock puts the cosh on any service increases.
Had the trial been held, would a guilty verdict be given....
Ha, Ha, very droll, ( and if found guilty, what would the punishment have been-life term on pacers?)
I think the real death-knell for these was the fact they weren't as cheap as had first been anticipated. It was 2/3s the cost of a new DMU with "no" modifications, ie: as tube stock with a diesel engine. For something with 1/3 of the design life, it just doesn't make financial sense.
I'll be interested to see how cheap (or not) the 319 FLEX is going to be, relative to a 195.
This is one of the key points about the D230, even the basic setup is really quite expensive for what it is and it's expected lifespan. And if a TOC wants it to be able to be operated on anything other than slow, low capacity branch lines then the costs gets closer and closer to that of a new unit.
There is rumour over on the WNXX forum that the cost is expected to be high, maybe considerably higher than a regular 319. That could be a D319 killer too. I suppose the one advantage Porterbrook have over VivaRail is that they might consider absorbing some of the costs if TOCs balk at the prices, something that VR are not in a position to do. Even so, if the D319 is too expensive then the argument for more new units becomes ever more compelling, especially given the large orders in place already making it fairly easy to request bolt-on orders, and given that the manufacturers in question can mostly offer bi-modes if needed.
Wait till we get the first fire on an IEP...
I remember the first A320 crashing into a forest on test, and thinking that was the end of the line for it (and maybe Airbus).
However, the crash was quickly put down to "pilot error" and the A32x series has had vast orders since.
It is now arguably the most successful aircraft of its type.
If the project is dead, then I will refer to Class 230 as the Dodo-Train - I was going to use Al-D-Train, but that was taken to refer to the failed Fyra project (Aldi-Trein).Had the trial been held, would a guilty verdict be given....
If the project is dead, then I will refer to Class 230 as the Dodo-Train - I was going to use Al-D-Train, but that was taken to refer to the failed Fyra project (Aldi-Trein).
The project is not (yet) dead.
If one had to describe the project in the same terminology used by a consultant in a hospital when asked what the condition of the patient was, what wording might well be used?
In critical condition, perhaps? Certainly not dead yet.
Hi, I clarify that it is still an "if".The project is not (yet) dead.
Or, more like, the Dorm or Dormant-Train if we see a long period of delay.In critical condition, perhaps? Certainly not dead yet.
The project is not (yet) dead.
If one had to describe the project in the same terminology used by a consultant in a hospital when asked what the condition of the patient was, what wording might well be used?
If one had to describe the project in the same terminology used by a consultant in a hospital when asked what the condition of the patient was, what wording might well be used?
For reasons unknown the very idea of these units, which seem an interesting and potentially useful idea to me, seems to inspire loathing in some quarters.
Probably one of the bunch that talk about new plastic trains and how old trains are the best ever. The 'Back in my day' lot.
If one had to describe the project in the same terminology used by a consultant in a hospital when asked what the condition of the patient was, what wording might well be used?
I do love the "if in doubt, have a cup of tea" approach clearly visible on the photo, though