Goldfish62
Established Member
- Joined
- 14 Feb 2010
- Messages
- 10,039
Correct - it's to theoretically reduce the time needed for an evacuation through the emergency passages into the service tunnel. With a 200m train you could in theory have a 87m walk between even the closest part of the train to the nearest exit.
Agreed. Although based on E*'s track record of (non-)evacuations I'm not sure that this makes the blindest bit of difference.