• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

EMR Class 360's

Status
Not open for further replies.
O

Old DMU

Member
Joined
26 Apr 2021
Messages
9
Location
Northamptonshire
Ethan1852 said:
Here is a link to a recent press release from EMR about the class 360 services. "https://www.eastmidlandsrailway.co....ct-more-seats-and-a-simpler-timetable-on-our#". It mainly talks about the benefits the service will bring to the line and also some more information about the trains themselves.
Click to expand...
Looked at this EMR press release. It mentions "EMR Connect will be comprised of eight carriage electric trains serving Corby, Kettering, Wellingborough, Bedford, Luton & Luton Airport Parkway every 30 minutes on weekdays from 06:00" I thought some trains were to be twelve carriages and that's why some platforms had been lengthened or is this a temporary situation during Covid restrictions ? It doesn't mention 12 car. during peak periods. Is it just an experiment re "demand" or something to do with the pantographs problems people mentioned on here a while back?
 
Last edited:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

W

Wolfie

Established Member
Joined
17 Aug 2010
Messages
6,986
Old DMU said:
Looked at this EMR press release. It mentions "EMR Connect will be comprised of eight carriage electric trains serving Corby, Kettering, Wellingborough, Bedford, Luton & Luton Airport Parkway every 30 minutes on weekdays from 06:00" I thought some trains were to be twelve carriages and that's why some platforms had been lengthened or is this a temporary situation during Covid restrictions ?
Click to expand...
Perhaps better to only commit to eight carriages and people are pleasantly surprised if 12 pitch up rather than mention 12 and get loads of moans that there are only eight.... I am assuming that eight is the default.
 
TRAX

TRAX

Established Member
Joined
2 Dec 2015
Messages
1,711
Location
France
Apologies if this has been covered before - aren’t 21 Class 360s a bit much for the Corby service ? Even if they aren’t going to run as single units, it’s still quite a lot of extra stock for a not-so-frequent service.
 
43096

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
16,744
TRAX said:
Apologies if this has been covered before - aren’t 21 Class 360s a bit much for the Corby service ? Even if they aren’t going to run as single units, it’s still quite a lot of extra stock for a not-so-frequent service.
Click to expand...
No, it’s just the right fleet size. 6 sets needed for a 30 min interval service, originally planned to be 12 car sets. That needs 18 units, with maintenance cover 21 is the ideal fleet size.
 
TRAX

TRAX

Established Member
Joined
2 Dec 2015
Messages
1,711
Location
France
43096 said:
No, it’s just the right fleet size. 6 sets needed for a 30 min interval service, originally planned to be 12 car sets. That needs 18 units, with maintenance cover 21 is the ideal fleet size.
Click to expand...
Great thanks
 
E

Edvid

Established Member
Joined
7 Feb 2008
Messages
1,856
Old DMU said:
Looked at this EMR press release. It mentions "EMR Connect will be comprised of eight carriage electric trains serving Corby, Kettering, Wellingborough, Bedford, Luton & Luton Airport Parkway every 30 minutes on weekdays from 06:00" I thought some trains were to be twelve carriages and that's why some platforms had been lengthened or is this a temporary situation during Covid restrictions ? It doesn't mention 12 car. during peak periods. Is it just an experiment re "demand" or something to do with the pantographs problems people mentioned on here a while back?
Click to expand...
8-car services are a result of COVID-supressed demand. 12-car services will be provided if the demand recovers well enough, but it might be a good while before that happens.

The pantograph "problems" were simply temporary restrictions until the 3-pan 110mph capability of the new OLE was proven.
 
T-Karmel

T-Karmel

Member
Joined
20 Mar 2010
Messages
399
Location
London
I suppose that supressed demand and shorter trains running will help out with refurbishment of these trains.
 
O

Old DMU

Member
Joined
26 Apr 2021
Messages
9
Location
Northamptonshire
T-Karmel said:
I suppose that supressed demand and shorter trains running will help out with refurbishment of these trains.
Click to expand...
High "T-Karmel"! It would be good to think that what you say is right. After being used to fairly good class 222 2+2 seating standards, the ex Anglia class 360's do really need to be upgraded for the Kettering/Wellingborough/Luton London commuters. Corby you may remember was reported as being one of the places having the fastest growing population outside London and with cheaper house prices at present has become an attractive area for people in "the city" to buy housing when travel times to St. Pancras are only just over 70 minutes. If they live in outer London, local train + underground can be about the same.
 
Last edited:
43066

43066

On Moderation
Joined
24 Nov 2019
Messages
11,577
Location
London
“EMU 100” speed boards are now appearing on the fast lines, just North of Cricklewood on the down where linespeed rises above 100mph for the first time, and in a couple of other places.

Quite surprised that’s being done, rather than just a issuing a blanket instruction not to exceed 100mph South of Bedford north junction, but there we go.
 
I

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,214
43066 said:
“EMU 100” speed boards are now appearing on the fast lines, just North of Cricklewood on the down where linespeed rises above 100mph for the first time, and in a couple of other places.

Quite surprised that’s being done, rather than just a issuing a blanket instruction not to exceed 100mph South of Bedford north junction, but there we go.
Click to expand...

If it's an infrastructure restriction, it needs to be signed and in the Sectional Appendix.
 
43066

43066

On Moderation
Joined
24 Nov 2019
Messages
11,577
Location
London
Ianno87 said:
If it's an infrastructure restriction, it needs to be signed and in the Sectional Appendix.
Click to expand...

In that case I’d imagine there will soon be a lot more of them and it’s a work in progress.

Obviously this is the first time AC stock capable of greater than 100mph has been used on the route so something had to be done. Just seems surprising there wasn’t a simpler workaround given it’s a blanket ban south of Bedford and should only be temporary.

A related point came up before (I can’t remember which thread). Namely that the widely known about 100mph max for electric stock hasn’t historically been sign posted and nobody seemed to know where it originated from, it also wasn’t in the SA IIRC.
 
E

Edvid

Established Member
Joined
7 Feb 2008
Messages
1,856
43066 said:
Obviously this is the first time AC stock capable of greater than 100mph has been used on the route so something had to be done.
Click to expand...
If you mean EMUs, then yes. When Euston was shut for engineering works in 1991, Class 86/87-hauled InterCity services (accompanied by 47s for the Nuneaton-Bedford stretch) used the Midland Main Line that year, as seen in the video below.

 
43066

43066

On Moderation
Joined
24 Nov 2019
Messages
11,577
Location
London
Edvid said:
If you mean EMUs, then yes. When Euston was shut for engineering works in 1991, Class 86/87-hauled InterCity services (accompanied by 47s for the Nuneaton-Bedford stretch) used the Midland Main Line that year, as seen in the video below.

Click to expand...

Thanks for posting that. Absolutely cracking.

It might well be the case that in those days the line speed was 100mph max for all stock. From what I’ve read this remained the case until well after HSTs came into use on the route (does anyone know when the 110mph was introduced?)

The 100mph speed board at St Albans in that video is still current, but virtually the entire line (on the fasts) between north of Cricklewood and Wellingborough is now >100, apart from St Albans, and the area around the Lutons.
 
bengley

bengley

Established Member
Joined
18 May 2008
Messages
1,931
43066 said:
In that case I’d imagine there will soon be a lot more of them and it’s a work in progress.

Obviously this is the first time AC stock capable of greater than 100mph has been used on the route so something had to be done. Just seems surprising there wasn’t a simpler workaround given it’s a blanket ban south of Bedford and should only be temporary.

A related point came up before (I can’t remember which thread). Namely that the widely known about 100mph max for electric stock hasn’t historically been sign posted and nobody seemed to know where it originated from, it also wasn’t in the SA IIRC.
Click to expand...
Thameslink 387s were 110mph capable.
 
dorsetdesiro

dorsetdesiro

Member
Joined
30 Oct 2017
Messages
640
Fom the Northants Telegraph, the 360s probably will look like that after a full refurb & repaint:

T0FLMTMwMTY3Mjg1.jpg
 
E

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
26,666
Location
Nottingham
43102EMR said:
I’ll give it to EMR - it sounds like they’re planning on doing anything and everything to make sure all their long-term cascades look and feel like brand new trains...
Click to expand...
But unfortunately, once you step inside, not for an undefined period after they are brought into service.
 
Kneedown

Kneedown

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2007
Messages
1,801
Location
Nottinghamshire
edwin_m said:
But unfortunately, once you step inside, not for an undefined period after they are brought into service.
Click to expand...
They've all had a good deep clean inside, the staff at KDS have been working tirelessly, and continue to do so. The general ambience inside the units is rather pleasant to my eye.
 
L

LowLevel

Established Member
Joined
26 Oct 2013
Messages
8,197
Sets now failed in Corby Station so unless they're resurrected that's that unfortunately!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top