Killingworth
Established Member
And that's another storyforgot about them but I think they are running evry two hours north of Newcastle right now.
And that's another storyforgot about them but I think they are running evry two hours north of Newcastle right now.
Well of course, when the only other thing really running are 110mph 387s, which take up 1 1/2 paths - it’s merely a flashback to what it used to be like on the Western.Indeed. The choice is between one service which takes the time required for two paths, or no service at all.
Ordinarily, you would want two services which take one path each, but unfortunately that is not an option at the moment due to the inferior performance of the Turbos compared to the IETs!
I suspect most passengers would guess from the name that it's a very-not-good thing. Which would be pretty accurate.Interesting.
Was that poster aimed at (would-be) passengers?
Should I know what a "code black" is?
11 now. But the vast majority (>80%) have failed checks. This includes units in awkward outstabled locations. It will effect the M-F service.It was 9 earlier
GREEN - the service is operating normally or with a minimal number of minor delays
YELLOW - there is moderate disruption but customers are able to continue their journeys, albeit with some delay
RED - the service has (or is expected to) deteriorated to a level where customers are experiencing significant delay to their journeys and we are providing alternative transport, tickets can be accepted on other Train Operators services or we are diverting trains via alternative routes
BLACK - we advise customers to avoid travelling as we cannot guarantee they will be able to reach their destination
Presumably they can still be moved empty without too harsh a speed restriction?11 now. But the vast majority (>80%) have failed checks. This includes units in awkward outstabled locations.
Like near Worcester/hereford?awkward outstabled locations.
Like near Worcester/hereford?
I suspect most passengers would guess from the name that it's a very-not-good thing. Which would be pretty accurate.
800308 in the Hereford Sidings at Worcester Shrub Hill this morning.Like near Worcester/hereford?
In theory, no.There have been previous postings that WCML crews don't sign 185s but are there TPE crew members that only sign 802s and not 185s?
A few did, and were stopped mid-journey at the closest possible station, if I recall correctly.Did any IET services even manage to start this morning before this saga started? If so what happened to the ones that were mid-journey?
im guessing the better places might be swansea with landore and the hitachi depot there for issues in wales11 now. But the vast majority (>80%) have failed checks. This includes units in awkward outstabled locations. It will effect the M-F service.
It‘s always easy for staff to accidentally use internal jargon like that, just like you introduced CSL2…Code Black is part of CSL2 messaging - sometimes it makes its way out into the passenger-facing side of things, but most of the time it’s used internally.
what will likely happen in the week then could we expect hsts to be brought in or a patch work service with day tfw doing all services west of i dont know say newport / cardiff gwr providing high speed to bristol and connecting to Cardiff via cross country as a temporary measure to maximize fleets?
Presumably the few Edinburgh - Newcastle shuttles that run could use a 397 with Glasgow crew if needed, and then 185s on everything between Newcastle and York? Of coruse there's 802210 available too.802s have been tested along the WCML only this week so could in theory cover for 397s, as Glasgow do sign through to Manchester Piccadilly, but as Newcastle and York don't sign 397s and Glasgow don't sign south of Newcastle 397s couldn't run vice 802. Even if they did they couldn't run south of York anyway, notwithstanding the fact Marshall Meadows doesn't put enough power in to that wiggly wire anyway....
In my understanding all TPE crews sign 185s. Getting and keeping them in the right place may be a challenge, though, as you say. However they do seem to be getting a service going using them.
what will likely happen in the week then could we expect hsts to be brought in or a patch work service with day tfw doing all services west of i dont know say newport / cardiff gwr providing high speed to bristol and connecting to Cardiff via cross country as a temporary measure to maximize fleets?
TPE message at 13.08 to Stakeholders says checks on some units had been completed without finding any faults. Priority today seems to to check all the units ASAP, and get stock and crews into position to operate as near as possible a full service tomorrow. Today is as good as written off.Checking RTT, it seems 9 of 11 TPE Liverpool-Newcastle have so far been cancelled today, with another 2 starting (very) short at York.
1654 is en route, and the remaining 3 are scheduled to run.
Might be talking rubbish but is there any possibility of these trains being checked today, running for a weeks and then forming cracks in the future?
I heard Northern's CAF units - which are also experiencing cracks, with about 20 out of service currently - are being regularly inspected to catch this if it happens, so presumably something similar here?Might be talking rubbish but is there any possibility of these trains being checked today, running for a weeks and then forming cracks in the future?
Of course, but there will already be people looking into ways to rectify this and there will already be people planning alternative schedules for checking it.Might be talking rubbish but is there any possibility of these trains being checked today, running for a weeks and then forming cracks in the future?
I wouldn’t be surprised. But then again it’s not as if the stock would be necessarily suitable.I bet a number of the Leasing and Spot Hire Co's are kicking themselves today - Porterbrook and the ex Chiltern Mk3s, ROG for letting go of the 47s, Eversholt for the 321 scrapping etc. A lot of companies and groups have been contacted today.