Indeed like a scene from the old days, i expect there will be a lot questions to answer.Grosjean should get a lotto ticket later, he has all the world's luck and good fortune today
Indeed like a scene from the old days, i expect there will be a lot questions to answer.Grosjean should get a lotto ticket later, he has all the world's luck and good fortune today
Yes, thank god he is still alive and unbelievably walk away from it.I honestly thought I’d just watched a fatal accident. Very glad it wasn’t !
Indeed like a scene from the old days, i expect there will be a lot questions to answer.
That was a big one, thank god Romain's alive and relatively ok.
Haven't seen the race. Only the clips. Shocking. Walked away with minor burns and a potential broken rib.
none of us have seen the race yet
I don't think they ever even considered that a car would be heading so far off the track on the inside of a corner.I think they’ll want to look hardest at the placing and design of the barriers. Sticking out like that where they can collect cars doesn’t seem ideal.
I don't think they ever even considered that a car would be heading so far off the track on the inside of a corner.
Except its a different circuit next week, but clearly there are a number of things to look at as Ross Brawn indicated in an interview with sky particularly the barriers and the car bursting into flames.It was very similar to Kvyat's crash at Silverstone in that respect - it wasn't anticipated that a car would ever be arriving at the barrier at that bit of the circuit with any sort of speed but as both that and today's incident shows - it's never a zero probability. I wouldn't be at all surprised to see tyre barriers put up there ahead of the sakhir GP next week, or indeed going forward on all circuits. Off the top of my head, I can't think of any good reason for there to be either exposed armco or concrete barriers on a circuit
Except its a different circuit next week, but clearly there are a number of things to look at as Ross Brawn indicated in an interview with sky particularly the barriers and the car bursting into flames.
I don't think they deliberately expose it, rather they never thought to cover it. Live you said, it's possible that the FIA will require all exposed concrete and Armco barriers to have at least tires in front of them.Off the top of my head, I can't think of any good reason for there to be either exposed armco or concrete barriers on a circuit
No it was a pretty freak accident.
Doesn't mean there aren't lessons to be learned and safety improvements to be made. The fact that a car can split open and wedge itself inside a barrier if it hits it at just the wrong angle isn't something that you go "ah well, it's unlikely to happen again"
I think they've gone on record saying the opposite, which has been a source of criticism of the halo.They're on record saying that Jules Bianchi would have survived had the halo been on cars back when?
Accident was Japan 2014 and he died in 2015.2015 was it?
Paul diResta timed impact to extraction at 18-20 seconds.There is a helicopter shot of the crash that shows Grosjean was in the fire for at least 20 seconds!
Romain Grosjean has been ruled out of this weekend's Sakhir Grand Prix following the burn injuries sustained in his terrifying 140mph fireball crash.
Grosjean's Haas team said treatment on the Frenchman's hands following the harrowing accident at Sunday's Bahrain Grand Prix is "going well", but that he will spend another night in hospital.
The team said it is anticipated that Grosjean, 34, will be discharged on Tuesday.
He will be replaced by the team's Brazilian reserve driver Pietro Fittipaldi this weekend on the outer loop of the Sakhir Circuit in Bahrain.
The 24-year-old, who is the grandson of double world champion Emerson Fittipaldi, will be handed his F1 debut.
Grosjean's participation at the season-concluding race in Abu Dhabi a week on Sunday, which is set to be his last in the sport, is uncertain.
"Romain Grosjean is continuing his convalescence at the Bahrain Defence Force (BDF) hospital having remained there overnight following Sunday's incident at the Bahrain GP," the Haas statement said.
"Treatment on the burns Grosjean sustained on the back of both his hands is going well. Grosjean was visited by Gunther Steiner, team principal of Haas F1 Team, on Monday, and it is anticipated he will be discharged from the care of the hospital on Tuesday 1st December."
Steiner said: "After it was decided that the best thing for Romain was to skip at least one race, the choice to put Pietro in the car was pretty easy. It's the right thing to do and it's obviously a good opportunity for him."
Fittipaldi added: "Importantly I'm happy Romain is safe and healthy. We're all very happy his injuries are relatively minor after such a huge incident.
"Obviously, it's not an ideal set of circumstances to get my first opportunity to compete in Formula One, but I'm extremely grateful."
Speaking from his hospital bed just hours after surviving the most dramatic accident of recent memory, Grosjean credited the sport's controversial halo device with saving his life.
The French driver's car split in two and burst into flames after he pierced through a steel barrier at 137mph following a collision with AlphaTauri's Daniil Kvyat.
Grosjean scrambled to get out of his burning wreckage for almost half a minute before leaping to safety.
The force of the impact registered at 53G, but Grosjean escaped with just minor burns to his hands. He was airlifted to the BDF Military Hospital, 10 miles north of the Bahrain International Circuit.
The halo device — a three-pronged titanium protection system which sits above the driver's head and was introduced in 2018 - played a prominent role in the Frenchman's remarkable survival.
Grosjean had been sceptical about the introduction of the halo, but on Sunday night, with both his hands in bandages and tubes monitoring his vital statistics, he said: "I wasn't for the halo some years ago but I think it's the greatest thing that we brought to Formula One and without it I wouldn't be able to speak to you today."
I've heard it said both ways, I think the only answer we can give is "it's unclear".I think they've gone on record saying the opposite, which has been a source of criticism of the halo.
Which seems like clear nonsense to me - arguing that a safety feature may not have prevented one specific death (which is at best speculative) doesn't mean that it won't be effective in preventing future deathsI think they've gone on record saying the opposite, which has been a source of criticism of the halo.
Which seems like clear nonsense to me - arguing that a safety feature may not have prevented one specific death (which is at best speculative) doesn't mean that it won't be effective in preventing future deaths
The issue arose because it was a reaction to Jules's death but then they said it wouldn't have saved him - "So why have you made the cars heavier, more expensive & uglier when it wouldn't have saved him?", if you get the drift.Which seems like clear nonsense to me - arguing that a safety feature may not have prevented one specific death (which is at best speculative) doesn't mean that it won't be effective in preventing future deaths
I'm along the same lines but I still think the aesthetic issues and 2 massive holes in it still need sorting out, both of which could be done by adding the shield or aeroscreen.It looks awful but it is clearly a life saver. I was against ( not in the spirit of F! or some-such conceited nonsense) it but the evidence shows that was wrong.
To which the answer is: "Ask Alonso, Alex Peroni and Grosjean what they think of the halo.""So why have you made the cars heavier, more expensive & uglier when it wouldn't have saved him?"
I think you're missing the point. They introduced the halo as part of the reaction to Jules's death and then said it wouldn't have saved him, which makes the entire thing seem pointless. (And I can't believe I have to say this but we have seen it's not pointless)To which the answer is: "Ask Alonso, Alex Peroni and Grosjean what they think of the halo."
I'm along the same lines but I still think the aesthetic issues and 2 massive holes in it still need sorting out, both of which could be done by adding the shield or aeroscreen.
The original one looks better because it slopes down and has a lower profile (however is less safe). The shield is still the best looking option and could probably meet up with the halo better without looking slab-sided.There's plenty of arguments for the aeroscreen (presume you mean the one as used in indycar) but aesthetics is not one! Head on the cars look awful I think, due to the combination of height and slab-sidedness