• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Formula 1

jb108822

Member
Joined
26 May 2016
Messages
75
Location
Cheshire
I had a Club seat for race day. Now I understand why it's considered one of the best places to sit! 8-)

For Saturday I camped out at Becketts, because I'd heard it was a good place to watch the cars from, and because that grandstand has a roof!



LOL! As the oldest team in the Championship how the hell can Ferrari be so bad at race strategy?? :s
One of the reasons we went for Club on the Saturday was because it was covered, not gonna lie. :p
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Bungle73

On Moderation
Joined
19 Aug 2011
Messages
3,040
Location
Kent
One of the reasons we went for Club on the Saturday was because it was covered, not gonna lie. :p
Actually, I had wet weather gear with me, so if the worst came the the worst I might have sat there anyway, since it was the place that I'd decided that I wanted to sit. As a matter of fact I was at Brands Hatch for the BTCC a few months ago, with a grandstand seat, which of course has no roof, and it was on and off wet and windy all day. I just stuck it out. Funnily enough, despite the roof, the rain still came in, and I was glad to be kitted out.

Last time I was at the grand prix I sat at Stowe, which has no roof, but only for race day, and the weather was nice (2019)
 

Enthusiast

Established Member
Joined
18 Mar 2019
Messages
1,226
I remember him best for the 2019 Canadian Grand Prix. Not the race, but his post-race rearrangements of the "1 - 2 - 3" placards :D. They should rename Turn 3 at Circuit Gilles Villeneuve in his honour.

A superb driver; a good and fair competitor, a worthy for-time champion.
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
31,234
Location
Fenny Stratford
I'm looking forward to seeing how Ferrari utterly fail to capitalise on this!
that is a given!

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

And with no easy overtaking and DRS largely ineffective, Verstappen won't find cruising through the field as easy as it usually is.
he will have to do it the old fashioned way: in the pits ;)
 

Domh245

Established Member
Joined
6 Apr 2013
Messages
8,425
Location
nowhere
In answer to my question yesterday, it was (perhaps rather predictably) the strategy
 

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
12,210
Any reason why Ferrari didn’t go for two sets of softs, instead of one hard and one soft on Leclerc.
 

Domh245

Established Member
Joined
6 Apr 2013
Messages
8,425
Location
nowhere
Any reason why Ferrari didn’t go for two sets of softs, instead of one hard and one soft on Leclerc.

They pitted leclerc for his second stop very early with the intention of going to the end, but the hards (as proven by everyone else who'd run them in the race) just weren't working. So they bailed for soft at the end to give him half a chance of recovering something

Or at least, that would be the theory - god only knows what the Ferrari strategists were thinking (perhaps they were leaving it all to him!)

At least there's plenty of other racing on to distract from the disasterclass
 

Domh245

Established Member
Joined
6 Apr 2013
Messages
8,425
Location
nowhere
Via massive strategy based incompetence. The big suprise was hiw early in the race it was!

Seemingly from even before lights out - they were the only of the 'top 3' teams to start on mediums if I remember rightly, though this was compounded by pitting both cars onto a second set of mediums around lap 20.

I have to (begrudgingly) commend Red Bull and Verstappen for an excellent drive though
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
31,234
Location
Fenny Stratford
Seemingly from even before lights out - they were the only of the 'top 3' teams to start on mediums if I remember rightly, though this was compounded by pitting both cars onto a second set of mediums around lap 20.

I have to (begrudgingly) commend Red Bull and Verstappen for an excellent drive though
He has done well. He even had a spin!
 

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
12,210
They pitted leclerc for his second stop very early with the intention of going to the end, but the hards (as proven by everyone else who'd run them in the race) just weren't working. So they bailed for soft at the end to give him half a chance of recovering something

Or at least, that would be the theory - god only knows what the Ferrari strategists were thinking (perhaps they were leaving it all to him!)

At least there's plenty of other racing on to distract from the disasterclass
Bit in bold - exactly my point!
 

JD2168

Established Member
Joined
11 Jul 2022
Messages
1,386
Location
Sheffield
Massive strategy mistake by Ferrari today, Charles should have been at least on the podium, if not winning the race. The hard was never going to work, the Alpine & Haas were struggling on them from early on. They should have done the same as Hamilton & extended the medium stint so they could put softs on at the end.
 

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
12,210
Massive strategy mistake by Ferrari today, Charles should have been at least on the podium, if not winning the race. The hard was never going to work, the Alpine & Haas were struggling on them from early on. They should have done the same as Hamilton & extended the medium stint so they could put softs on at the end.
Wasn't Sainz trying to pull off the same strategy as Hamilton? Commentary today reported the Mercs as being the most effective of the top 3 teams for tyre life.
 

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
12,210
Any reason why Ferrari didn’t go for two sets of softs, instead of one hard and one soft on Leclerc.
They pitted leclerc for his second stop very early with the intention of going to the end, but the hards (as proven by everyone else who'd run them in the race) just weren't working. So they bailed for soft at the end to give him half a chance of recovering something

Or at least, that would be the theory - god only knows what the Ferrari strategists were thinking (perhaps they were leaving it all to him!)
So I’ve just read that Ferrari only had x1 soft and x1 hard left for Leclerc. That explains a lot, but still doesn’t make up for the woeful showing.
 

Top