[mobile welfare facilities] Whyever not? Accommodation to an acceptable standard that can be used while allowing diagrams to keep within the manning agreements (or whatever their current name is) will not be refused, I am sure - in fact I can't see why co-operation would be withheld.No guarantee that the unions will accept them.
It's a bit off-topic, but we keep seeing rabid, prejudiced anti-union posts on this forum. People need jobs, employers need do-ers and businesses need to succeed - but not by ruthless exploitation of their staff.
We see too many companies bragging about their financial performance, while treating staff with respect seems to be anathema nowadays, regardless of whether the company is utterly dependent on the goodwill of its employees or not (some get away with it, being mostly just a financial construct.) Maybe lack of cooperation is the result of staff being pushed around or otherwise treated like dirt?
The best managers are the ones that will hear what the disaffected are saying* (and take action) as opposed to those who just report the grovelling yes-men's adulation up the management chain. The former have a long term future (and will provide it for everyone from within their department) the latter seem to provide better performance in the short term but are a complete liability in the longer term.
* which is why unions are needed, to speak truth to power. I get the impression that most employees feel so weak or at risk of revenge nowadays that no-one dares do anything but kow-tow... With disastrous results all over the place. Carillion? GW electrification? Class 769? 230?