If Trainline are doing that they really should not be. "Open return" means "Period return" to most people. That must be causing no end of trouble, good to see you take a pragmatic line on it.
As I pointed out in the thread about this Trainline problem,
Just wondered if anyone has had issues with this. Seems to be a glitch in the trainline app that is marking valid tickets as expired and stopping people being able to access them. Apologies if I haven't explained this very well. 1621872197 Rewritten this, as it was hard to understand...
www.railforums.co.uk
virtually all TOC apps except the GoVia ones offer day returns when "open return" is selected (
link to post), but the ticket names including "Day Return" or "Return" are usually shown clearly, whereas Trainline is particularly bad because their "SplitSave" option is named just "SplitSave" with "Return same day" shown in smaller font below (albeit still clearly), and since this option is the cheapest it is also lifted to the top of the options list that is otherwise grouped into "Return same day" and "Return within 1 month" below (
link to post).
It's not clear whether this is relevant to this thread, though. (I tried a few test bookings but couldn't get Trainline (or even Trainsplit) to offer splits for Cheltenham Spa to Cardiff.) And even if this is what happened, I don't think it would change any of the advice being given.
If the OP breached the Byelaws, which they did, this would be highly unwise regardless of staff conduct. I am sure I recall a case on here where a complaint caused prosecution proceedings to be initiated.
Probably this thread:
Me and my partner traveled from Saltaire to Steeton . We boarded at saltaire whilst buying tickets on an app sat down and the guard came almost immediately, I showed him the app with the payment going through, he asked us to buy a ticket from him I asked why when payment was going through? He...
www.railforums.co.uk
The poster boarded a train before their ticket purchase in their app was completed (which is a no-no) and was immediately inspected. Since the purchase hadn't gone through, the inspector insisted a new ticket be bought directly from him, and after the poster refused they were kicked off the train. The poster states "we complained, now we have a letter asking for our version as with reference to contravention of railway regulations", and our assumption (although it's not completely clear from their posts) is that their details were not taken at the time of the incident, but they provided them afterwards with their complaint, so if they had not complained then the letter could not have been sent.