• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

May 2023 changes

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

ctrh136

Member
Joined
2 Sep 2014
Messages
116
To my knowledge, there are no fleet shuffles involving Southern at the moment
Will there be formation cuts as a result of this and the 313 withdrawal? I know some Oxted line services got reduced to 8 car but had 12 car restored again recently. I hope those don't get reduced again!
 

PGAT

Established Member
Joined
13 Apr 2022
Messages
1,470
Location
Selhurst
Will there be formation cuts as a result of this and the 313 withdrawal? I know some Oxted line services got reduced to 8 car but had 12 car restored again recently. I hope those don't get reduced again!
Oxted Line has and will continue to have a mixture of 8 and 12 car trains. Most of the big cuts were last year when the 455s were let go
 

Nicholas Lewis

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
6,153
Location
Surrey
This has been going on to a greater or lesser extent since May 18. Ever since then, except during the period where the really slimmed-down Covid timetables were running, it’s been common to experience what you have described. 700/0 on a 700/1 diagram has always been fairly common on GN (and I don’t mean where 700/0s have been *booked* as has sometimes been the case). Likewise cancellations due to train faults.

Despite my relatively low mileage on them, I’ve had more 700 failures in service than was ever the case with over two decades using 365s where they not once failed mid-journey on me. Indeed I struggle to recall a time when I suffered an outright cancellation due to a failed 365.
The majority of services from my station have been Thameslink 700's since May 2018 and they've performed fine with never a failure of AC/DC c/o in either direction. Only issue ive ever had with a 700 is when a train sat down at Balcombe with an alleged bearing issue. We were all chucked off and the train set off to Brighton albeit at reduced speed but got there and in all probability it was only a sensor failure i suspect.
It doesn’t really bode well that they are suffering even with the timetables having been slimmed back compared to pre-Covid. I guess things will improve in May with 387s taking over a chunk of their work on the stopping services, though a by-product of this will likely give us more 700/0 on 700/1 diagrams.
Going to throw off even more surplus 700's if that the case.
Do I remember rightly that the erstwhile Littlehampton ex Thameslink services will be changing to Electrostars?
ditto
 

PGAT

Established Member
Joined
13 Apr 2022
Messages
1,470
Location
Selhurst
Just noticed that Three Oaks and Winchelsea are now getting an hourly service from May!
 

infobleep

Veteran Member
Joined
27 Feb 2011
Messages
12,675
They regularly change times with plenty of allowances on Sundays as the base timetable has to assume two line working between Gatwick and Redhill instead of normal 4 line. Different engineering also means different times.

From May the Base timetable on Sundays is changing. Instead of 2 Thameslink services per hour Three Bridges to Bedford and 1 Horsham to London Bridge there will be a 2 per hour service Bedford to Three Bridges/Horsham (alternate trains swap destination - only the Horsham services call at Earlswood/Salfords). Hence the Reading to Gatwick service can now go at full speed.
Of course, if it is 2 lines then it would be different timings anyway so the base would have to change regardless I'm guessing.
Great that the train can go full speed though. Always a shame when faster non-stop services have to run slower due to pathing issues.

Of course, if I am traveling for leisure and I want to view disused railway sites and stations from the train, it can run as slow as it likes. :lol:
 

185

Established Member
Joined
29 Aug 2010
Messages
5,011
It looks from the timetable data like WMT may be partly or wholly abolishing First Class from May. Can anyone confirm either way?
Noticed that the other day after they were uploaded. Looking like every LNR train showing Standard Class Only. Wonder if it's an error, or something is afoot that they really should have publicised months ago - just 5ish weeks away this timetable.
 

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
7,603
Location
London
Oh I absolutely get that except that tonight for example I was on a very busy train from Paddington that was first stop Didcot - when a Reading stop is added in May I suspect it will be rammed!

Would probably be best to adapt the model to advertise certain trains as pick up only from Paddington.

Technically it does, but it’s not how operator performance is officially measured (with a couple of exceptions)



it is quite different, although they do produce a similar number!

There’s quite a few performance measures about to my knowledge, all which tell a slightly different story. Right Time, T-3 and PPM and then cancelled and part-cancelled are some.
 

BenS123

Member
Joined
1 Jan 2022
Messages
226
Location
Bournemouth
South Western Railway have today confirmed their timetable changes: https://www.southwesternrailway.com/other/news-and-media/news/2023/april/swr-confirms-may-timetable

We have confirmed our new timetable which will operate from Monday 22 May 2023.

The new timetable continues to match capacity with demand, with customer numbers at 78% of their total prior to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Peak time travel has recovered to 61% of pre-pandemic levels, meaning demand remains below the network’s available capacity.

A small number of important changes have been made to improve performance and provide better onward travel connections.
To improve the performance of key trains used by students at schools in the Weybridge and Chertsey areas, the following changes will be made:

  • 0723 London Waterloo-Alton starts 3 minutes earlier at 0720
  • 0720 London Waterloo-Woking starts 3 minutes earlier at 0717
  • 0717 London Waterloo-Chessington South starts 3 minutes later at 0720
  • 0803 Weybridge-London Waterloo starts 1 minute earlier at 0802
To provide better connections in Lymington for ferries to Yarmouth, Isle of Wight, two changes will be made:

  • 0929 Brockenhurst-Lymington Pier starts 13 minutes later at 0942
  • 0944 Lymington Pier-Brockenhurst 13 minutes later at 0957
To improve the spread of services on the Portsmouth Direct Line, between Portsmouth Harbour and London Waterloo via Guildford, one change will be made:

  • 0615 Portsmouth Harbour-London Waterloo starts 5 minutes earlier at 0610
To improve the spread of services between Westbury and Yeovil Pen Mill, and to better integrate with Great Western Railway’s new timetable on its Bristol Temple Meads to Weymouth route, two changes will be made:

  • 1137 Basingstoke-Yeovil Junction via Westbury starts 1 minute later at 1138 and will terminate at Salisbury instead of Yeovil Junction
  • A new service, 1251 Salisbury-Yeovil Junction via Westbury, will be introduced
 

BluePenguin

On Moderation
Joined
26 Sep 2016
Messages
1,605
Location
Kent
Completely agree - with Chiltern's slowing down makes me even more inclined to take Avanti. Worst case scenario, LNR to Rugby and change there onto a Crewe flyer into London.
I am not sure what you mean. Do you mean you would board a Crewe - London fast service at Rugby? Did the timetable usually make this worth while?
 

xydancer

Member
Joined
6 Jun 2010
Messages
108
Location
Rugby
Noticed that the other day after they were uploaded. Looking like every LNR train showing Standard Class Only. Wonder if it's an error, or something is afoot that they really should have publicised months ago - just 5ish weeks away this timetable.
First class tickets are also showing as 'not available' more or less across the board on their booking engine, though I did find one or two early morning exceptions. If it is a change, they are keeping very quiet about it!
 

jfollows

Established Member
Joined
26 Feb 2011
Messages
5,856
Location
Wilmslow
I am not sure what you mean. Do you mean you would board a Crewe - London fast service at Rugby? Did the timetable usually make this worth while?
I presume meaning something like 1Y44 13:36 Birmingham New Street to London Euston, but get off at Rugby at 14:15 to catch 1U32 14:27 (13:13 from Crewe) to Euston arrive 15:24 which is 25 minutes earlier than the arrival time from staying on 1Y44.
 

Desirolly

Member
Joined
14 May 2020
Messages
46
Location
Hertford Loop
Are the additional AAP (Alexandra Palace) stops for the slow Cambridge/letchworth services really needed?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

8stewartt

Member
Joined
18 Mar 2013
Messages
75
I'm sure you can guess some of the likely candidates ;)

It won't be done LTP at this stage, at least not for the start of the TT.


2 mins engineering allowance, which really isn't enough considering how far some of the services have come. Also nothing for trains from the Airport (unless they stop at all stations, in which case they get a pathetic <0.5> :lol:).

It's the headway and reoccupation values which are the biggest issue though. They're simply unachievable given the signalling layout, as well as the length of modern units and the defensive driving policies that TOCs have adopted.
Then you get me trundling through on my 100 SLU container train, getting given yellow red yellow red, expected to keep moving but with air having to run the whole length of the train for the brakes to release each time....
 

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
17,786
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
Are the additional AAP stops for the slow Cambridge/letchworth services really needed?

This came up before, the general feeling on here is that the answer is no.

Having said that, since May 18 most timetables have had the up services have extended dwells at some stations plus pathing time in the Alexandra Palace area, so it probably won’t affect the overall journey time (except when running late, of course). It will also effectively prevent these services using the fast lines to make up time or overtake a late-running Moorgate service.

But it gives Alexandra Palace their off-peak 6tph back, something they have had since the 1990s.
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
28,072
Location
UK
I suppose if a train is running late, we'll see Alexandra Palace skipped in a heartbeat!
 

Desirolly

Member
Joined
14 May 2020
Messages
46
Location
Hertford Loop
The introduction of the Sevenoaks services caused some issues through there too. Constantly 2/3 mins late but it created a pinch point when the Moorgate service came off the Hertford Loop, but it think it’s better now
 

mangyiscute

Established Member
Joined
6 Mar 2021
Messages
1,314
Location
Reading
I can't believe that there are genuinely people arguing against the Brockenhurst stop - considering the train will not take any longer and is usually quite empty why would not stopping be better? The only question I might ask is whether a stop elsewhere could be more beneficial, somewhere like Christchurch could get more passengers than Brockenhurst so perhaps it would be better to stop there.
 
Joined
24 Jul 2011
Messages
443
Location
Wigan
No local South wales ones though
There has been a lot of late notice changes to the timetable data recently, and I know Brian puts in a lot of effort to manually manipulate and ensure the accuracy of the tables - a very timely process. So I'm sure they'll be online before too long.

However, if there's a specific route you're after, I can send you a copy of the May timetable (albeit not the Fabdigital version, I'm afraid.)
 

BrianB

Member
Joined
21 Jan 2018
Messages
111
There has been a lot of late notice changes to the timetable data recently, and I know Brian puts in a lot of effort to manually manipulate and ensure the accuracy of the tables - a very timely process. So I'm sure they'll be online before too long.

However, if there's a specific route you're after, I can send you a copy of the May timetable (albeit not the Fabdigital version, I'm afraid.)
Indeed, with TOCS posting endless revisions every night it would be a pointless task creating the tables only to have to do them again, for example the Chiltern mainline is now on its 3rd iteration and TFW are posting endless revisions, although it does seem to have now settled down! As an update, there are now only about 23 tables left to and these will be posted soon, SW routes first, then SN, then SE, then TFW, then the miscellaneous rag bag that are the last NT and TP tables
 

jfollows

Established Member
Joined
26 Feb 2011
Messages
5,856
Location
Wilmslow
Indeed, with TOCS posting endless revisions every night it would be a pointless task creating the tables only to have to do them again, for example the Chiltern mainline is now on its 3rd iteration and TFW are posting endless revisions, although it does seem to have now settled down! As an update, there are now only about 23 tables left to and these will be posted soon, SW routes first, then SN, then SE, then TFW, then the miscellaneous rag bag that are the last NT and TP tables
Thanks for the update, Brian, you do a great job and you're made very busy by all the revisions for sure. It's just so good to have someone who cares doing this job now, and although it's not good that the timetable isn't finalised yet, you're the victim and the messenger and not the cause.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top