That's certainly the case for the 67s (which is why we still see Syphons up there). Personally, I prefer the Sprinters, but never mind.
Our 158s are useless they never work constantly fail, doors always fail, air con? don't get me started on that. they are claustrophobic due to the seating and in the winter the heating never works, 156s are reliable, good braking, handle the gradients, rarely fail and in the winter they strike alot of animals on the line and don't get damaged the same happens on the far north lines with the 158s and they normally get a fair bit of damage and loosing an actual engine has been known in 158s as well due to striking animals! 156s all the way for the west highland line.I don't like how it's 156s. Nothing against them, but I'd much rather the 158s take over these duties.
I wish my luck was as good as yours with the aircon lolI use ScotRail 158s all the time, and only twice has the air-con been out. It's as close to "never work, constantly fail" etc that they've ever got. Never a majour problem with them at all. In fact, I did the Shotts line twice simply because they now operate on it in contrast to the 156s.
Now I like the 156s. They're good trains, but I simply prefer the 158s overall. I find the 158s far more comfortable and suitable for longer journeys.
Our 158s are useless they never work constantly fail, doors always fail, air con? don't get me started on that. they are claustrophobic due to the seating and in the winter the heating never works,
The West Highland sleeper portion to Fort William is hauled by a Class 67, and has been since 2006/7.
...by those standards, I'm surprised ScotRail want to keep the ones they "borrowed" from Northern, even after Bathgate goes EMU
The ScotRail 158s should have been swapped for Central 156s all those years ago, which would have saved a lot of bother
The ScotRail 158s should have been swapped for Central 156s all those years ago, which would have saved a lot of bother
The ScotRail 158s are good units. They do their jobs well, and 67007's experiences with them are either a) exagerrated or b) just bad luck.
I use the 158s all the time. They're good trains and replacing them with 156s would've been a mistake. Take the Far North Line, for example. I beleive that passenger useage on that increased after the 158s replaced the 156s.
Unfortunately Scotrail's 156 units all have life expired interiors - unlike 156s elswhere they have never received a full refurbishment to the seating, tables, toilets etc. only new seat covers and other cosmetic "improvements" on the exterior.
As others have indicated they remain reliable day in day out, and from the point of appreciating scenery they must remain as the most suitable stock with their large windows and semi highback seats - I just wish they were more comfortable!
Unfortunately Scotrail's 156 units all have life expired interiors - unlike 156s elswhere they have never received a full refurbishment to the seating, tables, toilets etc. only new seat covers and other cosmetic "improvements" on the exterior.
As others have indicated they remain reliable day in day out, and from the point of appreciating scenery they must remain as the most suitable stock with their large windows and semi highback seats - I just wish they were more comfortable!
I never said the 156s weren't reliable. I was saying that the Scottish 158s are better trains than people are making them out to be.
I agree with that too, my only complaint is the cramped cab.
Open the front door and stretch out? Theres probably a million and one rules for why you couldn't run with the corridor door open.