Just to look at that document (assuming it is authentic) from the perspective of a layperson I find most of it to look pretty reasonable to be honest although would think there should be scope to go from 2+1 to say 4/5 + 1
It seems completely reasonable to think about the role of booking offices in 2022 and beyond - Similar to local banks or post offices they may sound like something that we should have but unfortunately the hard numbers just really don't support them anymore and like those other things it is only ever going to go in one direction sadly. Of course there will be edge cases to work out but fundamentally if something isn't being used then we shouldn't preserve it for the sake of it.
On Pensions an increase in pension age is completely reasonable - An age of 62 is an outlier compared to other comparable pension schemes (e.g. NHS 65 , Civil Service SPA , Teachers SPA) and the benefits still look to be pretty damn good compared to what you would get elsewhere. Of course everyone doesn't want to work longer for the pension, and given some of the comments it appears many of you truly hate your jobs, but we are living longer and the continued viability of the scheme must also be considered.
Sunday services are an absolute must to the future of your industry - commuting is not likely to go back to how it was so you need to cater to the market that is there when the demand is there which is the leisure market including weekends.
So 2%+1% does sound a little stingy compared to where the private sector settlements are right now (+ where public sector likely to be) but the rest really doesn't sound that unreasonable to be honest - you would still have a very good set of T&Cs compared to the wider economy.
What frustrates me about a lot of comments on this forum is the argument that times have changed and therefore the railway needs to be 24/7 and, as above, have the same pension age as others, while ignoring the fact that times have changed and we know much more about the impacts of shift work on health, both physical and mental. Shift work is unavoidable on the railway and in other industries but the impact is ignored, both by management and by outsiders. We ought to be balancing the requirements of the railway to expand its hours with an understanding of the demands that places on staff. And if pension ages need to be extended then we need a sensible conversation about the suitability of shift work and what options there are to transition older workers into more suitable roles, should they desire. It's a conversation no one is willing to have though. Instead, we get people bleating about how we know what we're signing up for (not so, the Sundays and the unsociable hours have increased since I started) and that we can leave if we don't like it (or, we could divert the money needed for endlessly training new starters into retention via addressing some of these issues).
I caught the tail end of a Grant Shapps interview earlier, and he was making noises about the 4 day week, you could hear the eye rolling in his voice. But a 4 day week working office hours with some autonomy over your day is very different to working a 4 day week getting up pre 0300 and being bound by a diagram, with no wiggle room over when you can get a coffee.
I'm not suggesting the removal of unsociable hours and nor am I suggesting these are issues unique to the railway but I do think it needs to be included, and taken seriously, in conversations about the future of the industry.
I feel the same about nurses, firefighters etc. Their knowledge and experience is invaluable and should be made the most of, but is an active frontline role the best for everyone when the firefighter is 65?