Then what on earth are they doing with them? I thought that they had been training for months using the prototypes.Given that staff training hasn't started yet I'd say you'll be lucky to see one in service before May.
Then what on earth are they doing with them? I thought that they had been training for months using the prototypes.Given that staff training hasn't started yet I'd say you'll be lucky to see one in service before May.
Testing the trains themselves, making sure they play nicely with the infrastructure, perform as expected, etc. I'm not sure on specifics but I wouldn't be surprised if Scotrail hadn't officially received a train yet, and they were all still in Hitachi's hands getting verification and fault free running mileage.
That's pretty poor. Don't they even have a simulator?Then what on earth are they doing with them? I thought that they had been training for months using the prototypes.
Hadn't heard about a modified vestibule cover. Any information?
Hadn't heard about a modified vestibule cover. Any information?
It is expected that the ORR will issue their letter of authorisation to run the units with passengers by mid-March.
Onboard Scotrail's Class 385's:
https://www.railengineer.uk/2018/02/07/on-board-scotrails-new-class-385/
I take it that another unit is on its way tonight?
I’m sure the wheelchair users will love being forced to sit next to a blank panel; that’s almost straight back to the long gone days of travelling in the guard’s van like a piece of luggage. Anyone for a discrimination case? The window layout of these units really is an appalling piece of non-design.
Remember you're only on the train for 45 minutes.
That's no excuse for such a poor layout, particularly one that is rather discriminatory against wheelchair users. (Able bodied passengers can choose not to sit next to a wall as there are window-aligned seats; wheelchair users can't).
It makes the PEP EMU look good in terms of window view, and that is really saying something.
Apart from the window right above the table in the wheelchair passenger's area?
Drivers have been trained on the 380 fleet, so will just need a conversion course for the 385. Hopefully one of the drivers on here can confirm?That's pretty poor. Don't they even have a simulator?
K
I wouldn't think that they are similar enough to merit just a conversion course. They are from a completely different manufacturer after all, and so there will be all manner of differences. Are the TMSs even the same?Drivers have been trained on the 380 fleet, so will just need a conversion course for the 385. Hopefully one of the drivers on here can confirm?
like an arrow slit in a medievil castleWow that looks like a really poor view out the front.
I wouldn't think that they are similar enough to merit just a conversion course. They are from a completely different manufacturer after all, and so there will be all manner of differences. Are the TMSs even the same?
I took the 1900 Edinburgh to Glasgow 380 ands its timetabled for 44minutes .Remember you're only on the train for 45 minutes.
For interest how long is the short conversation course which hopefully allows the driver to actually drive one. Presumably if required a full course takes much longer.Full courses are generally only required where there are significant or fundamental differences between units (eg DMU to EMU, EP brake to air pipe etc). Differences in TMS and minor handling characteristics can be dealt with easily and quickly.