Highland37
Established Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2012
- Messages
- 1,259
I may have missed it, but am I right in thinking we have no idea when the second set may appear never mind the rest?
I may have missed it, but am I right in thinking we have no idea when the second set may appear never mind the rest?
Hope is the word used when the expectation of another refurbished set before December timetable.
26 sets (I think) when all are done.So that would be 2 out of how many ?
26 sets (I think) when all are done.
We may be waiting some time...
Ok, unexpected corrosion but there is more to this. Wabtec are painfully slow.
While it's only rumours, it's been reported elsewhere that CrossCountry initially had to send their set back because of it not being up to scratch. Imagine worksmanship so shoddy it can't meet AXC standards....I think it's been reported several times that Wabtec lost a lot of skilled staff to the nice new IET depot and have been unable to recruit replacements. From the reports on the one delivered set, they have produced a quality product, and I would rather they took their time, and maintained that standard, than cut corners to rush them out.
XC set has not been back to Wabtec.While it's only rumours, it's been reported elsewhere that CrossCountry initially had to send their set back because of it not being up to scratch. Imagine worksmanship so shoddy it can't meet AXC standards....
It's in service so clearly hadn't been sent back.While it's only rumours, it's been reported elsewhere that CrossCountry initially had to send their set back because of it not being up to scratch. Imagine worksmanship so shoddy it can't meet AXC standards....
I think it's been reported several times that Wabtec lost a lot of skilled staff to the nice new IET depot and have been unable to recruit replacements. From the reports on the one delivered set, they have produced a quality product, and I would rather they took their time, and maintained that standard, than cut corners to rush them out.
IIRC it was that XC didn't accept it and asked for changes before they took it, rather than sending it back. Or that was what was said on a thread on this forum...While it's only rumours, it's been reported elsewhere that CrossCountry initially had to send their set back because of it not being up to scratch. Imagine worksmanship so shoddy it can't meet AXC standards....
Yes indeed. It got delayed by not passing a first final inspection in Wabtec, reported somewhere on this forum. All snags were rectified, and it passed a second inspection OK before delivery...……. That happens on any project at times, anywhere.It's in service so clearly hadn't been sent back.
I think it's been reported several times that Wabtec lost a lot of skilled staff to the nice new IET depot and have been unable to recruit replacements. From the reports on the one delivered set, they have produced a quality product, and I would rather they took their time, and maintained that standard, than cut corners to rush them out.
Really not an excuse after this amount of time. If that is still the reason given for non delivery of the contract we need a plan B because if they haven’t recruited by now it is unlikely they will be able to recruit. So there must be others that can do a fabrication job like that. Let’s be honest as an Engineering chalke gd there will be others capable of doing that.
As others on here have said, why has the work not been transferred to the Wabtec site in Kilmarnock? It's not like they don't know how to refurbish a Mk3!
Wabtec must be in a serious breach of contract situation over this - I suspect we will hear a lot more about this in the future, but nothing much just now.
Really not an excuse after this amount of time. If that is still the reason given for non delivery of the contract we need a plan B because if they haven’t recruited by now it is unlikely they will be able to recruit. So there must be others that can do a fabrication job like that. Let’s be honest as an Engineering chalke gd there will be others capable of doing that.
It is an excuse, this country has some serious shortfalls in staff types required for this sort of work, as it does in general across the engineering sector. So to lose loads of staff can be terminal. The Hitachi depot with a massive government contract can probably pay better with newer facilities too.
Recruitment is very difficult at the moment with the usual backfall of EU workforce becoming harder to recruit from with the current uncertainty. It still happens but the numbers are not as high as they once were.
I'm tempted to get political here, but I'll resist! Fair points, but, like I said, couldn't Wabtec Kilmarnock take on some of this work? I'm sure there's a logical reason why not, but seems to me sense to me. Or, even, Wabtec subcontracting the work? The perspective is that there just doesn't seem to be any urgency on Wabtec's part to get this work done, which I'm sure isn't the case! Anyway, I'm sure Scotrail are regularly 'on their case'...
My only hope (probably forlorn) is that as more coaches are refurbished, that the experience gained & the issues understood, that the coaches will go through quicker - I know this was the case when GNER (back in the day) were carrying out the 'Mallard' refurbishment on the Mk4s
My only hope (probably forlorn) is that as more coaches are refurbished, that the experience gained & the issues understood, that the coaches will go through quicker - I know this was the case when GNER (back in the day) were carrying out the 'Mallard' refurbishment on the Mk4s
This is my understanding too. Kilmarnock is pretty busy, and won't have the capacity to take on the work.It seems to be the case with other refurb projects (Scotrail 156s) albeit not as major as the HST program. As far as I'm aware Wabtec Kilmarnock is also pretty busy / full just now with other jobs so I doubt sending the MK3s there would be any quicker.
I'm tempted to get political here, but I'll resist! Fair points, but, like I said, couldn't Wabtec Kilmarnock take on some of this work? I'm sure there's a logical reason why not, but seems to me sense to me. Or, even, Wabtec subcontracting the work? The perspective is that there just doesn't seem to be any urgency on Wabtec's part to get this work done, which I'm sure isn't the case! Anyway, I'm sure Scotrail are regularly 'on their case'...
My only hope (probably forlorn) is that as more coaches are refurbished, that the experience gained & the issues understood, that the coaches will go through quicker - I know this was the case when GNER (back in the day) were carrying out the 'Mallard' refurbishment on the Mk4s
While it's only rumours, it's been reported elsewhere that CrossCountry initially had to send their set back because of it not being up to scratch. Imagine worksmanship so shoddy it can't meet AXC standards....