It appears the 700s have failed the European crash test standards. Or at least that is latest we have been told at work semi officially. Waiting to hear what this means re their introduction.
Isn't a bit late in the day to finding this out now
It appears the 700s have failed the European crash test standards. Or at least that is latest we have been told at work semi officially. Waiting to hear what this means re their introduction.
It appears the 700s have failed the European crash test standards. Or at least that is latest we have been told at work semi officially. Waiting to hear what this means re their introduction.
Blimey let's hope that's a quick fix. The repercussions could be huge.
If Siemens have cocked up that'll do German engineering the world of good after the car industry's antics.
Except unlike the VW issues it won't make the headlines, never mind the small print in the middle of the paper...
Is it known what aspect of the regs it's fallen foul of?
Will the one that has been delivered have to be sent back to Germany?
If the remedial work can be done at an existing depot in the UK run by Siemens, if SWT's Bournemouth depot is equipped for the remedial work, is it possible that it could be towed there, fixed, then towed back?
I bet Bombardier will be chuckling at the news.
Or at least smiling nervously as it wonders if it will be next...
SWT's Bournemouth depot is little more than a stabling and cleaning point for Desiros. The SWT Desiro maintenance facility is at Northam, but anything out of the ordinary such as structural repairs has been subcontracted out and has gone to Kilmarnock. IIRC any Desiros that have required repairs soon after arrival have gone back to Germany.
Some of the work to the South Western Desiro fleet has been carried out by Siemens in their roads within Eastleigh Works.
If a D-train can pass an EU crash test...
NB- I am not advocating the use of D-trains on the Thameslink program. Just a suggestion that welding some box steel to the front of the train might go someway towards helping the problem (if it is actually a problem at all. I really would have expected Siemens to have done testing like this, before building bodyshells, I think that (hope that) this will turn out to be a fib)
jonmorris0844 said:Can't they just update the software so it says it's passed?
On viewing the mock-up we were told that it was a very safe cab as far as crashworthyness goes. I would speculate that IF there is a problem with a crash test, that it's the wide walk through gangways between the coaches that are the problem, not the cabs.
But that's just me speculating!
66714 did the move, view able from my rear bedroom window in Selhurst at 00+14.
700107 (as per the link I posted up thread).
On viewing the mock-up we were told that it was a very safe cab as far as crashworthyness goes. I would speculate that IF there is a problem with a crash test, that it's the wide walk through gangways between the coaches that are the problem, not the cabs.
But that's just me speculating!
The problem is the area around the drivers legs.
Suggestions that lead trousers will form part of TSGN uniform are just rumours at this point...