Have any studies been done on the effects of the over zealous revenue strategies enacted recently by FCC, Northern, etc?
I would perceive that FCC got away with a lot due to its genuine monopoly, whereas in northern land there are trams, buses and car parks as an alternative.
This thread is imo a great example of overzealousness. We forum regulars recognise that a technical offence has been committed, but asking for the extra £80 is basically a dick turpin trick.
When responding, please confine comments to the growth of public transport, and not the technical breech itself.
I would perceive that FCC got away with a lot due to its genuine monopoly, whereas in northern land there are trams, buses and car parks as an alternative.
This thread is imo a great example of overzealousness. We forum regulars recognise that a technical offence has been committed, but asking for the extra £80 is basically a dick turpin trick.
When responding, please confine comments to the growth of public transport, and not the technical breech itself.