• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Train derailment (1Y27 18:20 GLQ - OBN)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Aictos

Established Member
Joined
28 Apr 2009
Messages
10,403
The vehicle resting in the trees was to be removed by road, the other was to be re-railed and moved on rail from site to a depot

There's a a 37 coming from Fort William which I've been told is a West Coast one, can't remember the number as I didn't write it down :oops:

It's to attach to the vehicle still partly on the rails which will then have a wheelskate attached and then the formation will then leave for Springburn works.

The 37 was booked to arrive at 1800 this evening.
 

andylloyd

Member
Joined
19 Feb 2007
Messages
441
Location
Gateshead, Tyne & Wear
There's a a 37 coming from Fort William which I've been told is a West Coast one, can't remember the number as I didn't write it down :oops:

It's to attach to the vehicle still partly on the rails which will then have a wheelskate attached and then the formation will then leave for Springburn works.

The 37 was booked to arrive at 1800 this evening.
516/676 perhaps?
 

455driver

Veteran Member
Joined
10 May 2010
Messages
11,329
Very easy at about 20mph, but it will be a bit of a bugger to "uncouple" them later :lol:
 

bloodmeal

New Member
Joined
7 Jun 2010
Messages
2
They've announced monday for the road re-opening, i've just had to go the LONG way around taynuilt to loch awe and back .... normally a 35 minute round trip, this time took me 4 and a half hours.
 

Aictos

Established Member
Joined
28 Apr 2009
Messages
10,403
think it was 676, certainly whichever one is a Fort Bill the noo, a 47 coming up light loco to replace it at the depot:)

I think that's the one which I was told, certainly sounds like it.

As to the 37 coupling up to the 156, there are such magical things known as emergency couplings which enable movement of two trains with different coupling systems, any driver here should be able to explain it in even great detail, ;)

As a example, back in 2008 there was a incident on the Thameslink in the Core resulting in a failed 319 being rescued by a 66 and also that year, there were OHL problems at Kings Cross resulting in the 67 dragging the FCCs away to I think Ferme Park.
 

richw

Veteran Member
Joined
10 Jun 2010
Messages
11,528
Location
Liskeard
being new to the forum, can anyone tell me whats so special about 499, compared to other 156s, its been refered to as the "infamous 499" amongst various things in this thread?
 

jimrbrobinson

Member
Joined
6 Jun 2010
Messages
257
Location
Astley, Tyldesley, Lancashire
being new to the forum, can anyone tell me whats so special about 499, compared to other 156s, its been refered to as the "infamous 499" amongst various things in this thread?

I don't know how it works with 499, maybe someone who works these trains for First Scotrail will elaborate, but as with any vehicle from motorbikes to aeroplanes, there are some which are better than others in the same class. It seems to me (if I've understood what I've read here correctly) that 499 was considered one of the better (or worse?) examples of the class.

In my old ambulance days, we had two of the same model of Leyland Daf ambulance at the station, numbered 707 and 708. 707 was a dream to drive, but 708 was an absolute pig. I remember at the time that the London Ambulance Service were using this model a lot, and talking to their crews they found similar things in their fleet. I presume something similar is the case with the 15x class rail fleet.
 
Last edited:

Vulcan

Member
Joined
10 Dec 2009
Messages
712
Location
Seaton, Devon
Coupling bar from the emergency coupling hook would have been answer enough, no need to make me sound like I know nothing.
 

LE Greys

Established Member
Joined
6 Mar 2010
Messages
5,389
Location
Hitchin
any idea what was being gas axed at about the 4.00 mark in this video?

Looked like it was just behind the rear bogie, which has pivoted to an extreme angle, so my guess would be either some part of the traction equipment hanging off, part of the dragbox or the exhaust. Whatever it was, it seemed to have snagged on the rail, and they decided to cut it rather than disentangle it.
 

jimrbrobinson

Member
Joined
6 Jun 2010
Messages
257
Location
Astley, Tyldesley, Lancashire
Just out of personal curiosity, does anyone know the status of this train now? It is repairable? In currently for repair? I would be interested to know how severe the damage was, both from the initial derailment, and from the recovery work. Thanks in advance for any info.
 

rail-britain

Established Member
Joined
12 Aug 2007
Messages
4,102
57499 is now awaiting repair
The damage is minor with the bogies requiring to be examined
The internal coupling and electrical connection requiring to be replaced

52499 is awaiting decision, as this will require more extensive repair work
The underframe has minor damage
One bogie has apparently sustained quite major damage so may have to be replaced
One of the wheelsets is also cracked and would have to be replaced, the other three will require work
As a result of the impact the final drive and gearbox may also be damaged
The fuel lines will probably also need replacing, although I understand the fuel tank is undamaged (only the outer skin has impact damage)
This vehicle may now receive a C4 exam, which would include a bogie swap
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top