Hardcastle
Member
Not a good start to the new year flooding between Oxenholme & Penrith with trains turning back at Carlisle or Preston.
My guess is that the problems stem from changes to land use on non-railway land uphill of the railway so gaining permission to do the work could be problematic.Is it possible NR could do work to avoid this? IE: better flood defences, building up banks and that kind of thing?
WCML problems between Preston & Carlisle seem to be on the increase. It's time the rail diversion via S&C was resourced properly (staff signing, locos, planning etc)....
Not a good start to the new year flooding between Oxenholme & Penrith with trains turning back at Carlisle or Preston.
How many train crew are there at Preston?Already happens courtesy of Preston depot.
How many train crew are there at Preston?
How many are on shift normally?
How many would be in the right place at the right time?
How many trips could each member of staff do in a shift?
How many trains would they need to divert compared to the point above?
Its all nice and easy on paper but in practice?
I wasn't advocating what the post said, merely stating that provision for such already exists. There's about 40 drivers and all guards who sign the S&C at Preston, IIRC.
This was never a problem long ago, when things were somehow able to be organised more appropriately......but of course its route retention which is the (expensive) problem.
This was never a problem long ago, when things were somehow able to be organised more appropriately.
The GWR route from Exeter to Plymouth has long suffered from storm damage at Dawlish, and the Southern route round Dartmoor also had more than its fair share of problems, so part of the roster for crews at Exeter, Plymouth etc was a daily trip they each worked of one another's trains over the alternative route. Everyone took a turn. In those times they used to take their own locomotives as well, so it was apparent what was going on.
Things have changed since those days with privatisation. S&C is served by "Regional" Trains of a different Company and WCML by "Inter-City" operator. Also there is the `fact that VT use mostly Electric (390) trains and the S&C (Northern) sees DMUs.
Maybe Mods could rename this thread North WCML Disruption discussion or something as it is becoming more regular as posters before me have mentioned. the ideal would be if they could wire up the S and C and book 1 turn each day to use it for driver and guard knoledge, meaning that you wouldnt need voyagers or Locos. I was at CAR yesturday evening and a lot of foalk didnt really know what was going on.↲
Not a good start to the new year flooding between Oxenholme & Penrith with trains turning back at Carlisle or Preston.
...the ideal would be if they could wire up the S and C and book 1 turn each day to use it for driver and guard knoledge, ...
Obviously it's a rural area but from my non-scientific opinion there seems to be an awful lot of flooding/landslide problems around oxenholme.
I believe the flooding was nearer Tebay. Let's not forget that Oxenholme - Penrith is 40-odd miles, so a lot of distance for things to go wrong in.