• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Passengers abandon train at Lewisham with 3rd rails still live.

Status
Not open for further replies.

theironroad

Established Member
Joined
21 Nov 2014
Messages
3,692
Location
London
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-43266245
"Southeastern rail services are disrupted after passengers grew frustrated at delays in south London, and began walking down the tracks.

Trains in Lewisham were held up after a passenger pressed the emergency button and got off when their train was held outside a station.

Several people then followed suit, causing the police to be called for assistance.

Southeastern said passengers could have been killed on the live tracks."

The company asked passengers to remain onboard.

_100258775_de27.jpg

Apparently this train was held here for 3 hours.

I imagine it's a DOO service but after an hour a controlled evacuation should have been authorised with the necessary switch off and block. It's perfectly understandable why people are going to jump out so close to the platform.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

joncombe

Member
Joined
6 Nov 2016
Messages
765
Apparently this train was held here for 3 hours.

I imagine it's a DOO service but after an hour a controlled evacuation should have been authorised with the necessary switch off and block. It's perfectly understandable why people are going to jump out so close to the platform.

A 376. DOO and no toilet. Not going to be good after 1 hour let alone 3.
 

SF-02

Member
Joined
26 Oct 2008
Messages
477
Indeed. Over an hour with no lights, heating or toilets on a packed 376 train (pics show packed trains as SE only running 2 an hour in peak instead of 8) is likely to cause medical difficulties with at least 1 person requiring attention, let alone 3 hours.
 

Mike99

Member
Joined
4 Mar 2011
Messages
656
Location
G E M L
was it 2K43 involved at Lewisham?, 17.19 Hayes to London Cannon Street. Arrived at 18.41, 57 minutes late and departed 22.01, 255 late.
 

EonLeader

New Member
Joined
4 Oct 2014
Messages
4
was it 2K43 involved at Lewisham?, 17.19 Hayes to London Cannon Street. Arrived at 18.41, 57 minutes late and departed 22.01, 255 late.
If it was heading into platform 4 as pictures appear to demonstrate, that'd be a Dartford train. Would hazard a guess that 2M48 (maybe 2M50) started it looking at (limited) reports
 

KingJ

Member
Joined
23 Dec 2012
Messages
197
If it was heading into platform 4 as pictures appear to demonstrate, that'd be a Dartford train. Either 2M48 or 2M50 started it looking at (limited) reports

I think it was 2M48 - stuck just after Lewisham. 2M50 was then stuck just before Lewisham - pictured in #766. 2S54 was on the Tanners Hill Flydown and the rear was foul of the points - blocking 2R46, 2H50 etc from going down the fasts to Orpington. Attached was how things were looking at 18:29.

(This is all just based off looking at the signalling maps across the evening and various pictures on Twitter though, I could be totally wrong).
 

Attachments

  • signal.PNG
    signal.PNG
    31.3 KB · Views: 204

2HAP

Member
Joined
12 Apr 2016
Messages
467
Location
Hadlow
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-43266245

Southeastern rail services were disrupted after passengers grew frustrated at delays in south London, and began walking down the tracks.

Trains in Lewisham were held up after a passenger pressed the emergency button and got off when their train was held outside a station.

Passengers complained of being cold, tired and stranded for up to three hours on a broken down train without heating, lights or use of the toilet, before fleeing through an emergency exit.

Any complaints about the poor standard of journalism should be directed to the BBC. "Train tracks" FFS.
 

John Bray

Member
Joined
3 Mar 2018
Messages
29
I think it was 2M48 - stuck just after Lewisham. 2M50 was then stuck just before Lewisham - pictured in #766. 2S54 was on the Tanners Hill Flydown and the rear was foul of the points - blocking 2R46, 2H50 etc from going down the fasts to Orpington. Attached was how things were looking at 18:29.

(This is all just based off looking at the signalling maps across the evening and various pictures on Twitter though, I could be totally wrong).

I guess that's one of the problems of building the new Tanners Hill link, it couples the slows and fasts so any Lewisham problems stop the mainline. Could the signallers have sent 2554 down the slow from LBG, or increased the spacing so it wouldn't attempt the fouling move? How reluctant are signallers to send trains to the wrong destinations if their route is likely to be blocked for some time?

I reckon mainline passengers would be fuming to be delayed by problems advertised at a station they bypass.
 

Kettledrum

Member
Joined
13 Nov 2010
Messages
790
Clearly this was exceptionally dangerous with the live rail. It's easy to blame the passengers for their stupidity and putting their lives at risk, but why did the train company think that it was acceptable, sensible or safe to leave them there for THREE HOURS just yards from the station?
What a poor way to treat your passengers
 

BestWestern

Established Member
Joined
6 Feb 2011
Messages
6,736
Unfortunately, whilst in these cases the railway knows very well what the risks are, there may be tens of stranded trains, all loaded with fed up punters who might bail out. Until it happens, it's impossible to know where to send your limited resources and start evacuating. It's a very troubling situation, but difficult to know what the answer is frankly.
 

BestWestern

Established Member
Joined
6 Feb 2011
Messages
6,736
Clearly this was exceptionally dangerous with the live rail. It's easy to blame the passengers for their stupidity and putting their lives at risk, but why did the train company think that it was acceptable, sensible or safe to leave them there for THREE HOURS just yards from the station?
What a poor way to treat your passengers

But what else could be done? It's stuck, in foul weather on congested infrastructure, so there's little chance of anything turning up to give it a push. As for getting pax off, this was I presume a DOO train? A small team of people are required to safely evacuate a loaded train, the Driver can't do it on his own. Indeed Driver and Guard is still pushing it for a controlled situation. Station staff are usually not PTS, and they certainly won't have been trained for a lineside evacuation, so despite their proximity in this case, they're not much good. So you're looking at NR staff, on-call managers, BTP etc, and of course they're all already running around like the proverbial chickens. So, what can you do really?!
 

MP33

Member
Joined
19 Jun 2011
Messages
413
On the BBC news this morning they announced that they would be speaking on the telephone to someone from Maidenhead who was on the train behind. I thought why would they be passing through Lewisham at that time of evening. They quickly corrected the BBC by stating that they live in Maidstone.

Well done BBC, you might get something right one day.
 

Robertj21a

On Moderation
Joined
22 Sep 2013
Messages
7,518
Anyone know how much communication there was with the stranded passengers - announcements, frequent updates etc.
 

Antman

Established Member
Joined
3 May 2013
Messages
6,842
On the BBC news this morning they announced that they would be speaking on the telephone to someone from Maidenhead who was on the train behind. I thought why would they be passing through Lewisham at that time of evening. They quickly corrected the BBC by stating that they live in Maidstone.

Well done BBC, you might get something right one day.

Good grief..........shocking!!
 

Antman

Established Member
Joined
3 May 2013
Messages
6,842
Anyone know how much communication there was with the stranded passengers - announcements, frequent updates etc.

Very little it seems as apparently the PA was inoperable so passengers relied on twitter.

In fairness I can't really see what more Southeastern could have done in the circumstances?
 

Kettledrum

Member
Joined
13 Nov 2010
Messages
790
Very little it seems as apparently the PA was inoperable so passengers relied on twitter.

In fairness I can't really see what more Southeastern could have done in the circumstances?

It seems that rescue services turned up very quickly once the passengers started walking down the line. Why weren't they alerted sooner?
 

BestWestern

Established Member
Joined
6 Feb 2011
Messages
6,736
It seems that rescue services turned up very quickly once the passengers started walking down the line. Why weren't they alerted sooner?

Again, because until then it wasn't an emergency? There were probably numerous stuck trains at various times over the past few days, they can't attend them all just in case!
 

Antman

Established Member
Joined
3 May 2013
Messages
6,842
It seems that rescue services turned up very quickly once the passengers started walking down the line. Why weren't they alerted sooner?

Police turned up to maintain order but I don't know about rescue staff?
 

Nevasleep

Member
Joined
3 Oct 2010
Messages
77
If Southeastern, Network Rail, or BTP couldn't get any resources or a plan together in South London within hours, then fair enough.
However no heat, lights, toilet, or communication for three hours, but yards from the station in an urban area, I can't blame the passengers either.
 

ComUtoR

Established Member
Joined
13 Dec 2013
Messages
9,397
Location
UK
It seems that rescue services turned up very quickly once the passengers started walking down the line. Why weren't they alerted sooner?

What; do you mean before they evacuated the train ?
 

Daz28

Member
Joined
11 Feb 2010
Messages
310
Location
Elmstead Woods
I think it was 2M48 - stuck just after Lewisham. 2M50 was then stuck just before Lewisham - pictured in #766. 2S54 was on the Tanners Hill Flydown and the rear was foul of the points - blocking 2R46, 2H50 etc from going down the fasts to Orpington. Attached was how things were looking at 18:29.

(This is all just based off looking at the signalling maps across the evening and various pictures on Twitter though, I could be totally wrong).

2M48 left Lewisham at 1734 and got stuck just outside the station a few minutes later.
SE twitter reported at 1813 that passcom activated on one of the trains stuck
They were tweeting from 1820 that engineers were en route to get the train moving
First reports of passengers self evacuating at 1840
Once the power was off, that led to more delays and more people making their own exit.

Whilst it is true that some people were stuck for three hours or more, the facts are the first selfish person to exit was only after an hour, and that then caused the next two to three hours of delays. It will be interesting to hear how much on train communication there was.
 

theageofthetra

On Moderation
Joined
27 May 2012
Messages
3,504
2M48 left Lewisham at 1734 and got stuck just outside the station a few minutes later.
SE twitter reported at 1813 that passcom activated on one of the trains stuck
They were tweeting from 1820 that engineers were en route to get the train moving
First reports of passengers self evacuating at 1840
Once the power was off, that led to more delays and more people making their own exit.

Whilst it is true that some people were stuck for three hours or more, the facts are the first selfish person to exit was only after an hour, and that then caused the next two to three hours of delays. It will be interesting to hear how much on train communication there was.
If the PA had failed, none.
 

Via Bank

Member
Joined
28 Mar 2010
Messages
669
Location
London
I don’t think some people really understand that a passenger railway is transporting humans, not inert robots.

Three hours, yards from a station, is bound to cheese some people off. Three hours with no toilets is going to result in someone needing to go. At three hours with no light or heat in this weather, on an apparently crowded train, it's a miracle there were no major medical emergencies. I've seen one report on Twitter from a lady who used a towel to hide the fact she was having a panic attack from other passengers (because hysteria is contagious.)

It's all well and good to say "it's dangerous" and "it's illegal," but if they think they might be in for an overnight stay on a packed train with no toilets or heat a la the New Forest incident, can you blame them? Especially if they were told the power was off because people were walking on the tracks - meaning they knew it was safe?

I know I sound like a stuck record but this keeps happening, and the relevant parties need to get their acts together and understand that in situations like this, people will self-evacuate.
 

Bromley boy

Established Member
Joined
18 Jun 2015
Messages
4,611
But what else could be done? It's stuck, in foul weather on congested infrastructure, so there's little chance of anything turning up to give it a push. As for getting pax off, this was I presume a DOO train? A small team of people are required to safely evacuate a loaded train, the Driver can't do it on his own. Indeed Driver and Guard is still pushing it for a controlled situation. Station staff are usually not PTS, and they certainly won't have been trained for a lineside evacuation, so despite their proximity in this case, they're not much good. So you're looking at NR staff, on-call managers, BTP etc, and of course they're all already running around like the proverbial chickens. So, what can you do really?!

This is it basically.

From watching the incident unfold on Open Time Trains last night there were three trains stuck in the immediate Lewisham area (one was thankfully in the station at p1).

All SE metro trains are driver only and have no gangway connection between units. Once the juice is switched off the emergency batteries will last 30-45 mins and best practice is to cut the unit out before these are exhausted (otherwise it may be impossible to cut back in). Cold and dark, no PA announcements, and stories on the news about passengers being stuck over night on a train the previous day. I can see why people might have been tempted to take matters into their own hands (not that I would ever condone egressing).

There were also at least two trains stuck between London Bridge and Lewisham. I’ve seen pictures of some passengers self-evacuating at north Kent east junction, which is some way up the line from Lewisham, near new cross. This is what would have buggered the job completely as it prevented anything moving on the mainline, otherwise it *might* have been possible to bypass the problems at Lewisham by sending trains down the mainline.

I’d imagine the juice being switched off in this area is also why it wasn’t possible for some trains to head back wrong road to London Bridge.
 

ComUtoR

Established Member
Joined
13 Dec 2013
Messages
9,397
Location
UK
I think they have their own battery...

Ours do not. As evidenced by the Chilleham incident. There is a battery backup option that may be installed but TOCs were given an option to have it at an additional cost.
 

amcluesent

Member
Joined
19 Dec 2010
Messages
877
I know I sound like a stuck record but this keeps happening, and the relevant parties need to get their acts together and understand that in situations like this, people will self-evacuate

Indeed. It is inevitable, same as it won't be long before drivers simply go past police who have closed a motorway for hours because there's a person standing a bridge parapet.
 

theageofthetra

On Moderation
Joined
27 May 2012
Messages
3,504
Ours do not. As evidenced by the Chilleham incident. There is a battery backup option that may be installed but TOCs were given an option to have it at an additional cost.
Again WHO agreed to this and signed it off. Utter madness.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top