• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

SWR Repaints and Refurbishments

TEW

Established Member
Joined
16 May 2008
Messages
5,852
It's the small things that would make a huge difference to the finished product, as you say they certainly don't feel fully refurbished at the moment. The toilets could really have done with a spruce up too, they aren't in great condition. All that seems to have been done is fitting a bit of sticky back plastic on the wall with some faint SWR stripes on.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Benjy3000

Member
Joined
18 Dec 2018
Messages
7
The whole refurbishment programme seems to be a rushed mess. There's no consistency with each unit they're doing and with the doorways the same it just looks like they haven't bothered. And definitely agree that the toilets could do with some work. I'm sure a staff member on the SWR forum said that the toilets were supposed to be refurbished.

Seems to be the same with the 158's and 159's, zero consistency with the livery and only a small number of units with interior refresh.

I'm interested to see what effort SWR have put into the class 442's as last time I saw a sneak into one they looked the same as when they were with GX without seat covers.
 
Joined
4 May 2012
Messages
309
Travelling on a refurbished 444 yesterday (I neither know or care what number it was), I used the very quiet "downgraded" section next to the smaller First Class area, which still had "FIRST CLASS" in capital letters on the windows. How difficult is it to either remove that from 4 windows, or at the very least cover it with something? Needless to say, as the train got busier towards Waterloo people kept asking "Is this really First Class?" No, that is through that door, and for your extra money you get a slightly higher-backed leather seat, a reading lamp and curtains. Hardly worth it from now on. Progress?
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,447
Travelling on a refurbished 444 yesterday (I neither know or care what number it was), I used the very quiet "downgraded" section next to the smaller First Class area, which still had "FIRST CLASS" in capital letters on the windows. How difficult is it to either remove that from 4 windows, or at the very least cover it with something? Needless to say, as the train got busier towards Waterloo people kept asking "Is this really First Class?" No, that is through that door, and for your extra money you get a slightly higher-backed leather seat, a reading lamp and curtains. Hardly worth it from now on. Progress?
Exact situation as I reported on the 12th, (post 1340). That was 444019.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,447
My apologies for not going back that far.
No criticism intended. There’s clearly separate and unaligned interior and exterior programmes going on. Interestingly, it rather disproves the regular suggestion that people are quick to sit in badly marked First Class if they ever get the chance, as you noted on your trip most passengers on my train were also reluctant to sit there. Maybe the average passenger really is aware of the rules...
 

Helvellyn

Established Member
Joined
28 Aug 2009
Messages
2,013
Seems to be the same with the 158's and 159's, zero consistency with the livery and only a small number of units with interior refresh.
To be fair to them the 158/159 fleet was mid-way through refurbishment so they had to negotiate new seat covers,etc., from what would have been ordered to SWT specifications. Plus the diesels are to go through another refurbishment when they get a densified seating layout (less tables; smaller 2+2 First Class).

Where there is a mess is the variety of liveries on each SWR unit. Though they seem to have settled on one now.
 

spark001uk

Established Member
Joined
20 Aug 2010
Messages
2,325
In all honesty, I much prefer this livery without the stripes. It especially sits well on the 159s. The 442s look good as well. I also wonder when they’re going to start repainting the 444s/450s.
I agree 100%, the striping was not good. Plain white/dark blue is much better. Whether they'll change the already striped units to conform remains to be seen. My initial guess is no.
 

Chiltern006

Member
Joined
3 Oct 2018
Messages
658
Is 450 552 refurbed as I watched a video yesterday which was filmed on the 22nd December 2018 and it showed 552 minutes in the SWT livery. If it is refurbed, then can I see some photos
 

Goldfish62

Established Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
10,077
I agree 100%, the striping was not good. Plain white/dark blue is much better. Whether they'll change the already striped units to conform remains to be seen. My initial guess is no.
It's stated in Modern Railways that they'll receive the stripeless livery.
 

Goldfish62

Established Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
10,077
There's a major article in Modern Railways about the refurb programme.

The Desiros are due for completion in May 2019, with repaints also starting next year and taking three years to complete. All 442s should be refurbished by May. While the Chapman seats (incorrectly states as Grammer in the article) are being retained they are having new Transcal bases. The units are being converted from DOO to guard operation.

Of the diesels, while the 1st Class will be getting 2+2 FISA seats, in Standard class the current seats and layout are being retained.

All units to receive the stripeless version of the livery.
 

winks

Member
Joined
11 Jun 2009
Messages
484
strip-y design is the best! The 442 currently berthed at Fratton looks a bit unfinished and I’m sure the interior hadnt been done. By unfinished I mean the livery looked crap !
 

Silverlink

Member
Joined
13 Apr 2016
Messages
92
Location
Northampton
This whole franchise is a mess! They should have just painted their trains with Dark blue all over and just has grey/blue doors! I reckon by the time the franchise ends SWT will be back painting their units back
 

Kite159

Veteran Member
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
19,278
Location
West of Andover
2+2 seating in first class on the diesels will mean less folk willing to upgrade at weekends and it will be only used by those commuters who have 1st class season tickets as a way to increase the chances of a seat, or whose who aim for a single seat so they can do more private work

Makes sense on the 444s as it increases standard class seats, but if standard class on the 159s remains the same then seems pointless. (Personally I would make the 158s standard class only)
 

TEW

Established Member
Joined
16 May 2008
Messages
5,852
Presumably the size of the First Class compartment will shrink when converted to 2+2, with extra Standard seating installed. Would seem rather pointless otherwise.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,913
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Which has an atrocious seat pitch for anyone above 5 foot 8. Give me a 444 any day.

It’s not the pitch, it’s the excessively thick seat backs with thick supports where your knees go. Swap them for Grammers in the same layout and it’d be fine, or with ironing boards positively generous.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,913
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
2+2 seating in first class on the diesels will mean less folk willing to upgrade at weekends and it will be only used by those commuters who have 1st class season tickets as a way to increase the chances of a seat, or whose who aim for a single seat so they can do more private work

I only travel 1st for a seat that is both window and aisle. Without that I am not interested.
 

Goldfish62

Established Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
10,077
2+2 seating in first class on the diesels will mean less folk willing to upgrade at weekends and it will be only used by those commuters who have 1st class season tickets as a way to increase the chances of a seat, or whose who aim for a single seat so they can do more private work

Makes sense on the 444s as it increases standard class seats, but if standard class on the 159s remains the same then seems pointless. (Personally I would make the 158s standard class only)
The article stated that the number of 1st Class seats would be unchanged, but standard class would increase. I quoted that the LAYOUT would remain unchanged. A pedant would of course point out that this isn't strictly possible if additional seats are being added in one section, but they'd better take that up with the Modern Railways editorial team.
 

samuelmorris

Established Member
Joined
18 Jul 2013
Messages
5,121
Location
Brentwood, Essex
The issue is never purely height, it’s more relative upper leg length. If your height is mostly in your body and lower leg it’s less of an issue.
True, but I physically don't fit in Northern's 150s and I can't sit straight on Thameslink 700s due to the seat pitch, so I don't think I'm short in that department either. I just never noticed it on 159s. The legroom isn't great, but it was enough for me and the rest of the seat I found very comfortable.
 

Goldfish62

Established Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
10,077
This whole franchise is a mess! They should have just painted their trains with Dark blue all over and just has grey/blue doors! I reckon by the time the franchise ends SWT will be back painting their units back
I think you're going to be disappointed Its highly likely that the name and livery will carry forward into the next franchise as per DfT policy.

Remember that SWT went through two logos before settling on the third, and it was at least 10 years before the last 455 was painted red. Prior to refurbishment there were Stagecoach liveried units with NSE seat moquette and NSE liveried units with SWT moquette. Then there were the 458s which hadn't all entered service before it was decided that the "white" livery would be for main line units only. It wasn't until 2016 that they finally received their "correct" livery.
 

Top