That's a good question. There's no shortage of Mk3 carriages but are there any ex-GWR power cars unaccounted for?Will there be a last-minute addition of an extra refurbished set after the accident this summer? Or will Scotrail make do with the sets they have?
Other way round. There’s very few ex-GWR trailers around now, but plenty of power cars.That's a good question. There's no shortage of Mk3 carriages but are there any ex-GWR power cars unaccounted for?
Is there a particular reason (other than owner) that they couldn't use ex-LNER Mk3s?Other way round. There’s very few ex-GWR trailers around now, but plenty of power cars.
Much easier with ex-GWR stock: interior fit (seats, lighting etc), jumper cables and the fact the ex-LNER stuff is in a shocking state.Is there a particular reason (other than owner) that they couldn't use ex-LNER Mk3s?
Possibly, but they are now owned by ScotRail, presumably for spares recovery.Are there still at least a couple of the unrefurbished sets still up in Scotland? Assuming they aren't already spoken for, presumably one of them could go for refurbishment?
Possibly, but they are now owned by ScotRail, presumably for spares recovery.
I believe these have been stripped for parts, and if so can't be used for refurbishment.Still two classic sets sitting in Dundee yard, coupled together sans power cars.
Also have been sitting with all their windows open and the end doors open to the elements and goodness knows what kind of wildlife (seagulls) have found their way inside.I believe these have been stripped for parts, and if so can't be used for refurbishment.
Anything is possible if you're willing to throw money at it.I believe these have been stripped for parts, and if so can't be used for refurbishment.
I'm sure, somewhere back in the midst of time during this thread, the point was made by >1 poster that the reason for the wee (!!) delay in the refurbishment was due to the (allegedly) shocking state that the ex-GWR trailers were in so are the ex-LNER ones really that bad or even worse?Much easier with ex-GWR stock: interior fit (seats, lighting etc), jumper cables and the fact the ex-LNER stuff is in a shocking state.
Have a look at the return to service time for the sets transferred to EMR. There's a thread on here that covers it.I'm sure, somewhere back in the midst of time during this thread, the point was made by >1 poster that the reason for the wee (!!) delay in the refurbishment was due to the (allegedly) shocking state that the ex-GWR trailers were in so are the ex-LNER ones really that bad or even worse?
I believe these have been stripped for parts, and if so can't be used for refurbishment.
I'm sure, somewhere back in the midst of time during this thread, the point was made by >1 poster that the reason for the wee (!!) delay in the refurbishment was due to the (allegedly) shocking state that the ex-GWR trailers were in so are the ex-LNER ones really that bad or even worse?
It’s difficult to know which were in a worse condition as both fleets have required significant repairs.Provided the structure is sound and suitable ownership / financial issues were agreed there's no reason they couldn't be used - any missing parts could be replaced., possibly using ex-LNER veichles as donors in some cases
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
It appears so, given the amount of work EMR have had to do.
They also have a completely different interior spec, so that would mean either a non-standard set or a gut and refit.
Judging by the pictures I’ve seen from Neville Hill, it’s nothing to do with the interior spec, but mostly about corrosion particularly around the gangway areas.
The LNER fleet was 9 sets / 23 power cars from Angel, 6 sets / 11 power cars from Porterbrook. The ScotRail fleet is all Angel owned.I thought that the contract was with Angel trains and most lner stock belongs to Porterbrook.?
The LNER fleet was 9 sets / 23 power cars from Angel, 6 sets / 11 power cars from Porterbrook. The ScotRail fleet is all Angel owned.
In any case, any replacement for HA22 will be down to the insurers to agree. Given the current low loadings, there's no guarantee that they will want a replacement.
In any case, any replacement for HA22 will be down to the insurers to agree. Given the current low loadings, there's no guarantee that they will want a replacement.
My thinking is they won't obtain a replacement and would use a 170 for cover if necessary. Just a thought.
If the aim is to have all long-distance services worked by HST’s, wouldn’t a 170 cause issues with some crew no longer being competent? Especially Perth-Inverness where there are no DMU commuter services like on the Aberdeen route. It would also counter-productive to the goal of removing suburban trains from long-distance services.My thinking is they won't obtain a replacement and would use a 170 for cover if necessary. Just a thought.
If the aim is to have all long-distance services worked by HST’s, wouldn’t a 170 cause issues with some crew no longer being competent? Especially Perth-Inverness where there are no DMU commuter services like on the Aberdeen route. It would also counter-productive to the goal of removing suburban trains from long-distance services.
For what its worth - I came from Inverness to GLQ on a 170 set (with no first class) during September - not sure whether it was a "diagramed" service or substitution
Any idea of the formation please?Realtime Trains - 555K 1321 Doncaster Works Wabtec to Slateford Depot
Realtime Trains provides live realtime running information for the Great British railway network using open data.www.realtimetrains.co.uk
I didn't bother to post this path when it appeared on RTT last week (there have been so many false alarms ) but it was manually activated a few minutes ago, so it should be leaving about now.
And it has indeed left.