• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

ScotRail HST Introduction - Updates & Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

supervc-10

Member
Joined
4 Mar 2012
Messages
740
That really does show how awful those vinyls are. The cab is beautiful gloss paintwork and then the bodyside is dirty, dull, and matt.
 

USRailFan

Member
Joined
2 May 2011
Messages
363
Location
Norway
They seriously look like burn-damaged scrap-ready units where most of the paint has peeled off...

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Will there be a last-minute addition of an extra refurbished set after the accident this summer? Or will Scotrail make do with the sets they have?
 

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
32,331
Location
Scotland
Will there be a last-minute addition of an extra refurbished set after the accident this summer? Or will Scotrail make do with the sets they have?
That's a good question. There's no shortage of Mk3 carriages but are there any ex-GWR power cars unaccounted for?
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
16,920
That's a good question. There's no shortage of Mk3 carriages but are there any ex-GWR power cars unaccounted for?
Other way round. There’s very few ex-GWR trailers around now, but plenty of power cars.
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
16,920
Is there a particular reason (other than owner) that they couldn't use ex-LNER Mk3s?
Much easier with ex-GWR stock: interior fit (seats, lighting etc), jumper cables and the fact the ex-LNER stuff is in a shocking state.
 

DB

Guest
Joined
18 Nov 2009
Messages
5,036
Are there still at least a couple of the unrefurbished sets still up in Scotland? Assuming they aren't already spoken for, presumably one of them could go for refurbishment?
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
16,920
Are there still at least a couple of the unrefurbished sets still up in Scotland? Assuming they aren't already spoken for, presumably one of them could go for refurbishment?
Possibly, but they are now owned by ScotRail, presumably for spares recovery.
 

CJSwan

Member
Joined
23 Aug 2017
Messages
161
I believe these have been stripped for parts, and if so can't be used for refurbishment.
Also have been sitting with all their windows open and the end doors open to the elements and goodness knows what kind of wildlife (seagulls) have found their way inside.
 

PG

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
3,288
Location
at the end of the high and low roads
Much easier with ex-GWR stock: interior fit (seats, lighting etc), jumper cables and the fact the ex-LNER stuff is in a shocking state.
I'm sure, somewhere back in the midst of time during this thread, the point was made by >1 poster that the reason for the wee (!!) delay in the refurbishment was due to the (allegedly) shocking state that the ex-GWR trailers were in so are the ex-LNER ones really that bad or even worse?
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
16,920
I'm sure, somewhere back in the midst of time during this thread, the point was made by >1 poster that the reason for the wee (!!) delay in the refurbishment was due to the (allegedly) shocking state that the ex-GWR trailers were in so are the ex-LNER ones really that bad or even worse?
Have a look at the return to service time for the sets transferred to EMR. There's a thread on here that covers it.
 

DB

Guest
Joined
18 Nov 2009
Messages
5,036
I believe these have been stripped for parts, and if so can't be used for refurbishment.

Provided the structure is sound and suitable ownership / financial issues were agreed there's no reason they couldn't be used - any missing parts could be replaced., possibly using ex-LNER veichles as donors in some cases

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

I'm sure, somewhere back in the midst of time during this thread, the point was made by >1 poster that the reason for the wee (!!) delay in the refurbishment was due to the (allegedly) shocking state that the ex-GWR trailers were in so are the ex-LNER ones really that bad or even worse?

It appears so, given the amount of work EMR have had to do.

They also have a completely different interior spec, so that would mean either a non-standard set or a gut and refit.
 

St. Paddy

Member
Joined
11 Sep 2019
Messages
622
Location
Hitchin
Provided the structure is sound and suitable ownership / financial issues were agreed there's no reason they couldn't be used - any missing parts could be replaced., possibly using ex-LNER veichles as donors in some cases

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==



It appears so, given the amount of work EMR have had to do.

They also have a completely different interior spec, so that would mean either a non-standard set or a gut and refit.
It’s difficult to know which were in a worse condition as both fleets have required significant repairs.

Judging by the pictures I’ve seen from Neville Hill, it’s nothing to do with the interior spec, but mostly about corrosion particularly around the gangway areas.
 

DB

Guest
Joined
18 Nov 2009
Messages
5,036
Judging by the pictures I’ve seen from Neville Hill, it’s nothing to do with the interior spec, but mostly about corrosion particularly around the gangway areas.

Sure, but the interior spec of those sets is different to the Scotrail ones in many many ways, so if they were to take one of those it would require a complere refit anyway if they wanted to avoid an oddball set.
 

InOban

Established Member
Joined
12 Mar 2017
Messages
4,397
I thought that the contract was with Angel trains and most lner stock belongs to Porterbrook.?
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
16,920
I thought that the contract was with Angel trains and most lner stock belongs to Porterbrook.?
The LNER fleet was 9 sets / 23 power cars from Angel, 6 sets / 11 power cars from Porterbrook. The ScotRail fleet is all Angel owned.

In any case, any replacement for HA22 will be down to the insurers to agree. Given the current low loadings, there's no guarantee that they will want a replacement.
 

DB

Guest
Joined
18 Nov 2009
Messages
5,036
The LNER fleet was 9 sets / 23 power cars from Angel, 6 sets / 11 power cars from Porterbrook. The ScotRail fleet is all Angel owned.

In any case, any replacement for HA22 will be down to the insurers to agree. Given the current low loadings, there's no guarantee that they will want a replacement.

I guess it depends on what they expect the loadings to be over the next few years - they'd look a bit lacking in foresight if numbers fo back up, they were short of capacity and all spare Mk3s had been scrapped by then.
 

Stathern Jc

Member
Joined
30 Nov 2019
Messages
329
Location
Inverness
I think the insurance arrangements are likely to be the key issue here.
Would that fully cover providing a like for like replacement?
Or might they pay a valuation of the lost stock (however that might be assessed)?
There could possibly be an offer for either option, which is where Scotrail's assessment of future travel levels would influence the decision.

I hope the situation DavidB describes where we are beyond the point of a practical sulution doesn't arise.
 

InOban

Established Member
Joined
12 Mar 2017
Messages
4,397

I didn't bother to post this path when it appeared on RTT last week (there have been so many false alarms ) but it was manually activated a few minutes ago, so it should be leaving about now.

And it has indeed left.
 
Last edited:

hexagon789

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Sep 2016
Messages
17,117
Location
Glasgow
In any case, any replacement for HA22 will be down to the insurers to agree. Given the current low loadings, there's no guarantee that they will want a replacement.

Obviously they wouldn't have diagrammed all 26 sets for service, so the loss of one essentially reduces maintenance cover. On that basis how many sets were going to be diagrammed for traffic out of the 26? Would the reduction to 25 sets, even if traffic levels recovered to reasonable levels within the next few years be so awkward?

My thinking is they won't obtain a replacement and would use a 170 for cover if necessary. Just a thought.
 

DB

Guest
Joined
18 Nov 2009
Messages
5,036
My thinking is they won't obtain a replacement and would use a 170 for cover if necessary. Just a thought.

I don't think any of us can have the slightest idea at the moment - it'll be down to a discussion between Scotrail, the leasing company and the insurers.

One thing which is worth noting though is that if they don't do it now, they may not have the option in the future as Mk3s may not be available, and the work would be more expensive for a one-off job than by adding another set to the current production line.
 

Goldromans

Member
Joined
11 Feb 2017
Messages
222
My thinking is they won't obtain a replacement and would use a 170 for cover if necessary. Just a thought.
If the aim is to have all long-distance services worked by HST’s, wouldn’t a 170 cause issues with some crew no longer being competent? Especially Perth-Inverness where there are no DMU commuter services like on the Aberdeen route. It would also counter-productive to the goal of removing suburban trains from long-distance services.
 

CEN60

Member
Joined
17 Dec 2018
Messages
283
If the aim is to have all long-distance services worked by HST’s, wouldn’t a 170 cause issues with some crew no longer being competent? Especially Perth-Inverness where there are no DMU commuter services like on the Aberdeen route. It would also counter-productive to the goal of removing suburban trains from long-distance services.


For what its worth - I came from Inverness to GLQ on a 170 set (with no first class) during September - not sure whether it was a "diagramed" service or substitution
 

DB

Guest
Joined
18 Nov 2009
Messages
5,036
For what its worth - I came from Inverness to GLQ on a 170 set (with no first class) during September - not sure whether it was a "diagramed" service or substitution

That's because the whole HST fleet isn't in use yet.
 

St. Paddy

Member
Joined
11 Sep 2019
Messages
622
Location
Hitchin
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top