asylumxl
Established Member
What's wrong with the announcement?
The next station is. Change here for a shuttle bus to the airport.
Or something to that effect.
What's wrong with the announcement?
The next station is. Change here for a shuttle bus to the airport.
Or something to that effect.
The next station is. Change here for a shuttle bus to the airport.
Or something to that effect.
What's wrong with the announcement?
Look out for new train smell on 387121 on its first day.
301 387116/302 387118
1W04 05:44 Brighton to Bedford
2W23 08:40 Bedford to Three Bridges
2W30 11:14 Three Bridges to Bedford
2W43 13:40 Bedford to Three Bridges
1W92 16:14 Three Bridges to Bedford
1W57 18:24 Bedford to Brighton
1W68 21:30 Brighton to Bedford
303 387108/304 387106
1H83 06:34 Bedford to Beckenham Junction
1G63 08:02 Beckenham Junction to Bedford
1W21 09:54 Bedford to Brighton
1W32 12:38 Brighton to Bedford
1W43 15:24 Bedford to Brighton
1B50 18:28 Brighton to London Bridge
1B55 19:42 London Bridge to Brighton
1W66 21:02 Brighton to Bedford
305 387109/306 387112
1W01 04:16 Bedford to Brighton
1W83 07:24 Brighton to Bedford
1W23 10:24 Bedford to Brighton
1W34 13:08 Brighton to Bedford
1W45 15:50 Bedford to Brighton
1W56 18:38 Brighton to Bedford
1W69 21:22 Bedford to Brighton
307 387121/308 387110
1W00 05:10 Brighton to Bedford
1J88 07:58 Bedford to Elephant & Castle
1G69 10:04 Elephant & Castle to Bedford
1W29 11:54 Bedford to Brighton
1W40 14:38 Brighton to Bedford
2W61 17:20 Bedford to Three Bridges
2W62 19:44 Three Bridges to Bedford
1W73 22:22 Bedford to Brighton
309 387109/310 387113
1W84 06:54 Bedford to Brighton
1B14 09:28 Brighton to London Bridge
1B19 10:42 London Bridge to Brighton
1B24 11:56 Brighton to London Bridge
1B29 13:12 London Bridge to Brighton
1B36 14:56 Brighton to London Bridge
1B41 16:12 London Bridge to Brighton
1W97 17:38 Brighton to Bedford
Bombardier already know about this, I've spoken to the guys who travel around on them it's a missing audio file, should be sorted soonish.
Yeah. It was obviously something along those lines, but the question is why was it missing in the first place? Do they not check the PIS before they hand the train over?
Also, why use audio files? Text to speech voice synthesis has improved a lot in recent years. There are plenty of lightweight, open source systems they could use.
When do we if at all start seeing 12car diagrams?
Sorry if I've missed it but is there any indication where the 387s will go after TL have finished with them?
Believe is to do with the name change that was supposed to have happened in December.
Name change, to?
Luton Airport. Originally (like first few days) the 387s used this.
They are replacing 319s which only run as 4 or 8 cars. 12 cars will remain 377s for now.
Luton Airport. Originally (like first few days) the 387s used this.
The track is suitable for 110mph South of Bedford not 125mph. The wires however were built for 100mph. The increased speed along with the multiple pans means the wires may not cope with the extra pressure. One pan creates a ripple, the second creates another. A third can cause the wires to move to far. To counter this the wiring set up must be different. One reason for the cost increases on the GWML is making the current OHLE suitable for trains up to 125mph and multiple pans up (ie 12 car Suburban train) at the same time.
Will the 387s ever announce Parkway properly?
You'd think Bombardier could have at least managed that before they went in to service...
Not opening at all IS a problem, but the others are slow enough that they cause frustration and I dare say confusion/panic with some unfamiliar passengers (especially tourists).
This problem needs to be fixed, somehow, for good.
Ahhh thank you! I completely forgot the wiring issue.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
No Southern train can say Sydenham correctly even though Southeastern can. Compered to Sydenham, Parkway should be a doddle.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
I've been on a 377 at Anerley and it took two/three minutes to open the doors. You would have thought they would have sorted this out by now - the S Stock manage it
S Stock manage it because they have trackside beacons at every station, whereas 377s only have it at a select few and mainly rely on GPS!
I wish they would formally rename Luton as Luton Town to make clear the distinction.
Well if would make sense to have beacons in the core for every station, since it's quite like the sub-surface lines.
A pair of 387s sat down at East Croydon this morning, with 106 at the rear. Blocked platform 2 for some time, southbound.
But then that would confuse people into thinking they'd arrived at Kenilworth Road.
Although that could be solved by renaming the latter Luton Town Nil.
But then that would confuse people into thinking they'd arrived at Kenilworth Road.
Although that could be solved by renaming the latter Luton Town Nil.
Feet wet? That's the biggest understatement I've ever heard. The pair at Cauldwell meaning Lovers Walk is two units down from its spare float. Won't be back any time soon.
Spare float?
I believe spare float is in reference to spare units available in an emergency, but I stand to be corrected.
Does anyone know if any of the weekday 12/42 departues from LBG-BTN are worked by 387's?