The contrast between GA and EMR is unbelievable. I recently had a few days in Norwich and did trips out on lovely new, often lightly loaded 3 carriage trains, operating on very much rural branch lines to Lowestoft, Great Yarmouth, Sheringham mad the East Suffolk Line. I do accept that some of these routes are very busy in the summer holiday season. What a contrast to the old 2 carriage EMR 158 units also departing from Norwich to Liverpool Lime Street, serving so many major cities. Whilst I travelled in comfort on lightly loaded GA trains there were crowds of people boarding the EMR Liverpool trains. The contrast with the EMR Class 360 trains and other routes out of London is somewhat similar.
My theory, which I’ve said before, is that GA and WMR (the latter also being ex-Abellio) got their train requirements in whilst quality was still a requirement. Funding enabled them to get new trains to a decent standard, particularly GA’s Stadlers.
EMR’s train requirements - in particular the non-IC operations - were a victim of very unfortunate timing in that DfT cost cutting (and then Covid) were severely limiting factors in terms of what EMR had available to them. The only options were mid-life, knackered cascaded stock badly in need of interior TLC.
Had EMR’s Electrics/Connect train requirements been submitted before DfT budget constraints, I can’t help but think that, whilst they may still have got the 360s, the internal refurbishment could well have been done to the quality as outlined in the franchise commitment and in a timely fashion. But here we are 2.5 years in and nothing tangible yet.
If it is indeed the case that the 360s were received in the state you suggest I wonder how how the previous lessees were allowed to return the 360s in that state? Or was the EMR lease at a reduced price to reflect that maintenance work was outstanding & to be done but EMR have just 'taken the money and run' - (or, not run).
I wouldn’t be surprised in the slightest if they got a cheaper lease rate for the 360s with the maintenance issues. The 379s could have been the other contenders, but it has been mentioned many times on here that their lease costs are high (and 30 units is too many for the Connect service). New build 745 derivatives could have done the job too, but again, financial outlay is the issue.
Whilst most of us won’t know for sure (because it’ll be commercially sensitive EMR/DfT information - those RF users privy to this wouldn’t be allowed to share anything with the rest of us), yes, a reduced leasing cost would have certainly been a factor.