Does anyone else share my puzzlement with the argument that because 80% of the electors voted for parties with Brexit in their manifestos at the 2017 election, then 80% of the electors wanted to see Brexit — an argument that has been trotted out quite a few times on air in the last couple of days? Yes, Labour and Conservative did indeed include that commitment, along with many other things as in normal general election manifestos. But those are the only two parties that were going to be capable of forming a government, so many people would be making their choice on the whole raft of what was on offer, not specifically on Brexit, and it seems wrong to generalise that they all voted to support this particular one policy. Suppose, for example, someone's motivation was to try to prevent Corbyn becoming PM at all costs and despite a hatred of the Tories voted for them for this reason, was that really a vote to support that particular manifesto policy on Brexit? Surely hardly any general elections anywhere can be seen just as one-issue votes?