Here's the quarter-final draw:
Leeds vs Chelsea.
Swansea vs Middlesborough.
Norwich vs Aston Villa.
Bradford vs Arsenal.
Harrogate's pitch is absolutely appalling - considering the fact that they put in a brand new drainage system there, on the day of the first match they were to play there after the works had been done (Altrincham), there was light showers, and the pitch flooded. I wouldn't particularly like to bet on when that replay will actually be played.
Having watched the Everton v Liverpool match on MOTD2, with the numerous points of contention, I am amazed that no-one bothered to make at least one posting on this thread with their views on that match.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/20152740
Former Man United, Blackburn Rovers and Norway centre-back Henning Berg is set to be appointed full-time Blackburn boss tomorrow noon.
Liverpool 1 - 3 Swansea FT. The defending champions are out.
Leeds vs Chelsea
It does not say much about the defensive qualities of either Chelsea or Manchester United as both of these two teams conceded no less than seven goals each over those two matches.
I've spent the last two days with a friend in Leeds and her boyfriend is a massive LU fan who typically attends ten home matches per season. He didn't have much to say about the apparent bias relating to Clattenburg (or anything else relating to him for that matter), but what he did say wasn't nearly as incriminating in United's favour as some of what you guys have said, and not just the pro-Leeds and/or anti-MU factions either. Instead, all he really cared about was Leeds vs Southampton (and Reading going four-up)...
FIFA video game fans will be amazed/amused/appalled/delighted/concerned (delete as appropriate) to learn that the same Leeds fan beat me 5-0 in one 6-minute half of a match - as Shamrock Rovers! Having said that, I was Southend. Says a lot really.
A few things to respond to now:
I would have if I was around Just for once, Señor Suarez, try to make the game a game and not a one-man show (for better or worse)...
Good choice in my opinion.
Good
Ouch!
Ask an Arsenal 03/04 regular and they will probably tell you that defence is at least as important as attack in terms of getting your tactics right. This says a lot about the modern state of the game.
So much for the "conspiracy theory" that penalties (especially in important matches) are never awarded against that team..:roll:
We've got Chelsea at ER in the next round, hopefully they'll just bring the reserves of their reserves.
Is this your new artwork for the story book for the next Gaviscon TV advert ..
So much for the "conspiracy theory" that penalties (especially in important matches) are never awarded against that team..:roll:
I personally don't think they would have won last night if there wasn't some very questionable defending from Utd Youngsters. And by questionable, I mean appalling.
This brings another point to mind. Is it only in league matches that a team is supposed to field its strongest side...or are any cup competitions not covered by this ruling.
This brings another point to mind. Is it only in league matches that a team is supposed to field its strongest side...or are any cup competitions not covered by this ruling.
A total nonsense and completely uninforceable rule, its a managers decision to rest players if he so wishes. Whos to say what a teams best side is apart from the manager.
A total nonsense and completely uninforceable rule, its a managers decision to rest players if he so wishes. Whos to say what a teams best side is apart from the manager.
I thought they had to name a squad at start of season, from which surely they can play anyone from their squad? Didn't Blackpool get fined for fielding a weakened squad and Holloway argued they were within his 25 man squad but they still fined the club.
I thought they had to name a squad at start of season, from which surely they can play anyone from their squad? Didn't Blackpool get fined for fielding a weakened squad and Holloway argued they were within his 25 man squad but they still fined the club.
Talking of Holloway he's been a bit quiet lately.
Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e using Tapatalk 2
They did, they played Villa, and if i recall correctly, they narrowly lost 3-2.
My only concern is when the 'bigger' teams do it in the league its called 'squad rotation', but when teams like Blackpool and Wolves do it its 'an unfair advantage'. Where's the fairness in that???
People who think the EPL is the world's best need to look at Germany's Budnesliga, certainly a better set-up for fans, even if the football is of a slightly lower standard.
Sir Alex Ferguson does not believe referee Mark Clattenburg used "inappropriate language" towards Chelsea player John Mikel Obi.
The Blues accused Clattenburg of making a racist remark during their 3-2 defeat by United at Stamford Bridge on Sunday.
"I don't believe he would make comments like that," said Ferguson. "I refuse to believe it. It's unthinkable."
Responding to Ferguson's remarks, Chelsea boss Roberto Di Matteo said: "He likes to talk about other clubs."
You'd think but Wolves got fined for it a couple of seasons ago by putting a weak team out against Chelsea in order to win their next game. I think both games were in the league though.
Contrast with more well known teams putting out weaker sides in the cup (and sometimes in the league) and getting away with it. When all said and done I agree with you, the manager has a squad but I can understand it because fans pay a lot of money these days.
I wish Ferguson would keep his mouth shut and stay out of the affair. There's no need for his comments... He criticises Chelsea before claiming that he doesn't like to talk about other clubs and trying to give the impression that he has some kind of moral superiority
Ferguson is a bully. He bullies his players (by all accounts), he bullies the authorities, referees, other managers, racehorse owners. Anyone, you name it. Sadly, he does have his lackeys in the press, so when someone stands up to him (like Rafi Benitez) it is portrayed as a "rant", a "meltdown", a sign that the other manager is on the brink of the sack. The man offers his opinions (as facts) on anything, whether or not it is his concern, but most of the time his opinions do not add up to much. His club's success is based not on any managerial skill, but on taking talent from elsewhere and sucking the last bit of benefit out of it before discarding it. He may be charming and intelligent in private, but I do not like what I see!Tis the arrogance of success backed up by the way he can do no wrong in the press.