dk1
Veteran Member
That’s what I thought. Many thanks.the Pendolino was named Royal Scot before departure
That’s what I thought. Many thanks.the Pendolino was named Royal Scot before departure
A mate said it was the service but apparently it is the 390.Have they named the service or the Pendolino? I was a bit confused.
Network Rail twitter are using the hashtag #RoyalScot to refer to the record run which is where the confusion came from.Yes cheers. @deltic confirmed too.
The (calendar) timing of this train is very clever. The huge demand for Glasgow to Euston services ahead of the England v Scotland football match at Wembley on Friday means all available spare 390s are being sent to Glasgow to work additional services to London. So the record attempt would have run anyway as an ECS, and the additional costs involved are marginal.
Are you sure about that? 1Z72 and 1Z77 (11:52 and 14:00 additionals) are showing as Express Passenger on RTT and are shown as departures on National Rail. 1Z25 (the return of the record attempt) shows as Unadvertised Express on RTT and doesn’t show on National Rail. It looks like it will just be bringing back the people it took up.The (calendar) timing of this train is very clever. The huge demand for Glasgow to Euston services ahead of the England v Scotland football match at Wembley on Friday means all available spare 390s are being sent to Glasgow to work additional services to London. So the record attempt would have run anyway as an ECS, and the additional costs involved are marginal.
1H18 turns right at Colwich, so less chance of conflict.I'm following the train, and I see that the first train in front of it is 1H18 Euston to Piccadilly. I see that this is running 2 minutes early so I suspect its driver has been briefed to get a move on until Norton Bridge! It even departed its booked stop at Milton Keynes a minute early.
so, its already failed or is there still spots to make up for lost time?1 minute late at Rugby.
I'd imagine the signallers, passengers and Avanti Management are watching this with bated breath.
EDIT: RTT just updated, currently RT.
Looking on RTT it set off one minute early, fell back to its alotted time slot between Wolverton and Rugby, but is back to 30s up at Lichfield. But then again I don't know what precision each of the timing points on RTT is reported at. Some seem to report 1/2 minutes, others just whole minutes. You would think it would gain on the APT-P through Norton Bridge, given the improvements there.so, its already failed or is there still spots to make up for lost time?
and due to switch to the Down Slow at Madeley
That’s the spiritThe pantograph of 1U26 has decided that it wants to have a go at knitting with 25kV at Stafford P1, however 1Z57 has got an exception to run through the DFL before both lines are blocked, in order to pry the old nanny away from her tools.
The precision is poor today, because RTT is only picking up TRUST reports (roll over the timings in the Realtime column and you'll see the source on any train). The train via the open data TD feed is running obfuscated (180Q I think) so RTT can't match them together.Looking on RTT it set off one minute early, fell back to its alotted time slot between Wolverton and Rugby, but is back to 30s up at Lichfield. But then again I don't know what precision each of the timing points on RTT is reported at. Some seem to report 1/2 minutes, others just whole minutes. You would think it would gain on the APT-P through Norton Bridge, given the improvements there.
Yes, I think 1U29 was booked to use the slow lines from Stafford, but presumably because it's far enough ahead of the special train it was sent fast line.That will be good given there is no Down Fast to Down Slow crossover at Madeley
My eyes are drawn to LNW 1U29 which is approaching Norton Bridge 2 mins down, and due to switch to the Down Slow at Madeley. Gerroutoftheway!
It would have been put on the Slows at Stafford North just outside the station.That will be good given there is no Down Fast to Down Slow crossover at Madeley
It’ll be out of its way by Crewe even if it was to run FL.Yes, I think 1U29 was booked to use the slow lines from Stafford, but presumably because it's far enough ahead of the special train it was sent fast line.
1S52 will be held - it’s in its path to do so.Potential trouble at Crewe.
1F14 (to Liverpool) and 1S52 (to Glasgow) both delayed into Crewe, and are now on the slow towards Winsford.
1F40 (LNR to Liverpool) on the slow adding to the complexity, currently at Crewe.