Services running under East Coast Trains's operating certificate at present (operator code LD) are Hull Trains units, the 803s have so far only appeared on GBRF operated test runs. A good indicator for an 803 would be if there are paths for it between Merchant Park and Darlington at the start and end of the day, as the 803s are still only running from the Hitachi site in Newton Aycliffe.I went out to see todays run and it was a Paragon unit. Is there any way of finding out in advance what tomorrow's will be? In the morning, obviously
Thanks for the heads up on what to look for, nipped out to see 803002 today on Newcastle to KX, saw it was returning to Darlington laterServices running under East Coast Trains's operating certificate at present (operator code LD) are Hull Trains units, the 803s have so far only appeared on GBRF operated test runs. A good indicator for an 803 would be if there are paths for it between Merchant Park and Darlington at the start and end of the day, as the 803s are still only running from the Hitachi site in Newton Aycliffe.
There are two paths tomorrow for test runs between Darlington and Edinburgh. These were also due to operate today but have been canceled so it remains to be seen if these will run tomorrow or not, I'll post an update once I know.
5Q61 12:47 Darlington - Edinburgh https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:K06021/2021-06-04/detailed
5Q62 15:33 Edinburgh - Darlington https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:K06022/2021-06-04/detailed
There won't be any 803s out this weekend, as 66751 which has been used to take them between Newton Aycliffe and Darlington returns to Tyne Dock light loco on Friday evening.
Been in pairs for roughly 2 weeks during the day, but mostly single overnightsIt's a fairly recent thing for them to be testing in pairs, don't know exactly when it started though.
004 made its first appearance in the factory yard this week so not long till that should venture out on test803003 has been used on some of the most recent overnight test runs. Just 803004 and 803005 yet to make an appearance on the national network now.
803003A five car set passed through York heading north at approx. 1515 today.
I thought they were usually done in the middle of the night in specially set-up Signal Protected Zone?Is it during these tests that they do the overspeed test?
I always wonder why there is no footage of new trains doing the overspeed (unlike the IC225s, for which there is footage of them doing around 160mph on YouTube).
And don't they only do them with 1 of the class before service entry, so possibly 800101 will of done that and no other units?I thought they were usually done in the middle of the night in specially set-up Signal Protected Zone?
Not sure about that, but if that is the case the whole process is a lot simpler than I thought and then yes, presumably that is it over and done with and it's simply crew familiarisation/training that's being done nowAnd don't they only do them with 1 of the class before service entry, so possibly 800101 will of done that and no other units?
They are out again today, just passed through York on this working:A pair of 803s 001 and 002 (according to Railcam) are out on test today coupled together
Lummy! As it were. Glad to see they're not pushing the boat out on this.
East Coast Trains would've been an awful name. Not only is it bland, but people (and Google) would confuse it for LNER. Lumo is at least something a bit different and memorable.
If that's on the website, that's a bit of clever keyword spamming actually because Google will pick it up in searches for LNER...Yep. Lumo says "we're definitely not LNER".
If that's on the website, that's a bit of clever keyword spamming actually because Google will pick it up in searches for LNER...
Both four letter names beginning with L running trains that look very similar except for paint. I think we all hoped for better but First's GWR is not luxurious and they even made a cramped dense Mark 3 interior so our hopes should not have been so high.No, I'm suggesting that the name Lumo is purely to clearly differentiate themselves from LNER.
Both four letter names beginning with L running trains that look very similar except for paint. I think we all hoped for better but First's GWR is not luxurious and they even made a cramped dense Mark 3 interior so our hopes should not have been so high.
The trains will look overwhelmingly different to the travelling public - the reason we know they're similar trains is because we're train enthusiasts!Both four letter names beginning with L running trains that look very similar except for paint.
You must really like looking at high plastic seat backs if you liked GWR's horrid Mk3 interior because that's most of what you could see.To be fair some of us liked the Mk3 interiors, and
Do you realise some non enthusiasts say it "luner"?And in no way does Lumo look or sound anything like LNER...
It’s grammar plastic thoughYou must really like looking at high plastic seat backs if you liked GWR's horrid Mk3 interior because that's most of what you could see.
Do you realise some non enthusiasts say it "luner"?
I genuinely didn’t until a child in my class was recounting their trip to London onboard a ‘luner’ train. I did the typical repeat back to toddler style, ‘You went on the LNER train? How exciting!’Do you realise some non enthusiasts say it "luner"?