Not if Scotrail intend to achieve the improvement in journey times on inter-city services that was stipulated by the Invitation to Tender: A 1+4 HST formation would have a similar power to weight ratio to the existing Turbostars, and quite possibly poorer acceleration and adhesion due to fewer powered axles and higher gearing. A 1+5 HST formation would be even worse, and both would be worse still if dragging a second 'dead' power car.
You could probably get comparable performance out of a Class 68 + DBSO, as well as allowing one more vehicle into terminal platforms. If, of course, there were any Class 68s. Or DBSOs.
There are racks for three bikes in the power cars.
That was referred to in the comment you're replying to, but it doesn't seem like a very impressive figure. Making 75% of the cycle capacity only available end to end seems like a bit of a mistake to me, I'd hope that this gets reviewed after some service experience with the refurbished sets.
Looking at the layouts, it's not obvious to me why each standard class coach couldn't have a toilet at one end and cycle storage at the other, rather than just one coach having cycle storage and giving up the toilet for it. I'm sure there's an excellent reason, I just can't figure out what it is!