Class 317722
Member
- Joined
- 11 Aug 2014
- Messages
- 36
Has anyone else noticed the amount of networkers which are tagged at the moment? Seems to of got really bad lately.
Yes I've noticed an increase on units I've seen around London terminals.
Do control teams log with BTP to ensure a crime is recorded, or is it simply washed off at soonest convenience without further ado?
Genuinely don't see the issue with Graffiti... It doesn't affect your journey, and is only a real issue if it covers windows, or the interior of the train. Money would be better spent else where
You’re in a minority there. Graffiti, if left on, gives the impression that the railway don’t care. It also lead to more graffiti. Finally, although I have no source for it, I reasonably sure that there is a study somewhere that established a link between graffiti and anti-social behaviour. Possibly from the NY subway.
Or put it another way, if someone tagged your car, or house, or bike, would you be happy to leave it on? I wouldn’t.
You’re in a minority there. Graffiti, if left on, gives the impression that the railway don’t care. It also lead to more graffiti. Finally, although I have no source for it, I reasonably sure that there is a study somewhere that established a link between graffiti and anti-social behaviour. Possibly from the NY subway.
Or put it another way, if someone tagged your car, or house, or bike, would you be happy to leave it on? I wouldn’t.
I guess at times the TOCs have to make a judgement call: if a unit is needed in traffic and there isn't an available spare, it might be sent out and be cleaned off when it's next on depot. Though SET may have the option of sending out 8 vice 10 if a 466 gets tagged, whereas for Northern if a 142 gets done, stopping it leaving the depot may mean a cancellation rather than a short-form.Don't get me wrong, I fully respect your opinion, but in Europe, where graffiti is much less or a concern, trains aren't thought less of, if anything, people prefer the train over there... As well as that, my house serves a purpose to be comfortable, and my place of rest, and fun. A train isn't relatable to my house or car.
If you are happy for people to graffiti your property then I respect your view, if not then you are inconsistent, as both a fare payer and a tax payer I have contributed to the cost ot these trains and expect others to respect them.Genuinely don't see the issue with Graffiti... It doesn't affect your journey, and is only a real issue if it covers windows, or the interior of the train. Money would be better spent else where
I think it was "The Tube" and they ended up catching they guy who used to tag "Tox" (I think)There was a programme on TV years ago. I don’t remember all the details but I seem to remember BTP photographed tags and compared them. Ended up busting the people responsible.
Think it was the tube in London, not just criminal damage to the trains but trespassing on the railway as well.
I was very surprised how bad it has now become. Are there any hotspot stabling locations where this might happen often
Don't get me wrong, I fully respect your opinion, but in Europe, where graffiti is much less or a concern, trains aren't thought less of, if anything, people prefer the train over there... As well as that, my house serves a purpose to be comfortable, and my place of rest, and fun. A train isn't relatable to my house or car.
Though the banlieues (spelling?) of Paris are "ghettos" almost as a matter of policy. In their case it's not a bug, it's a feature! Contrast with German cities which have long had a graffiti culture to rival Paris or Brussels but far less of the deprivation (since reunification, anyway) and associated anti-social behaviour.I very rarely travel with South Eastern but it I was struck by the number of 456s which had been subjected to graffiti tagging when I went over to Lewisham a couple of weeks ago. I think it was particularly noticeable to me because of the general lack of graffiti on rolling stock in London these days. I hope we're not heading back to the graffiti and window etching epidemic of of around 15 years ago. I know that the sacrificial film over windows has helped combat the later but overall this sort of vandalism makes for a generally unpleasant travelling environment.
There are various well know locations,
As it appears to be common that the classes of trains affected for this spell of graffiti artists all appear to run on third rail, I am basing this on the assumption that there is a gang operating south of the mighty Thames.
It's due to the police budgets being cut. Someone graffing a train simply isn't high enough priority to get a fast response. Same goes for if you are being burgled.
Seen a couple of SWR 455s with the remains of some graffiti on them - not even 'real' graffiti, just painted lines on the side of the train. I know it's not units, but I also reckon the approach into Claphan Junction has seen more tagging going on.As if a trip on a 465 wasn't bleak enough already.
I travel round London quite a bit (mainly SWR, but a bit of Southern, Thameslink and South Eastern) and it's quite a while since I've seen anything on or in a unit. That said I haven't been on a 465 since early December.
I think the worst I've had in the last three or four years was on a Scotrail 170 in service at Perth which had been done over in Aberdeen. Urban.