Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!
There seems to be a drop in capacity on SW to NE, EXCEPT on a couple of selected trains that are now pairs of voyagers. Great if you can be flexible and purposely travel on one of the 3 or 4 trains a day that are pairs, but not so good if your previous 5 car set is now a a 4 car set (as seems to be the case with most SW to NE services now).
There seems to be a drop in capacity on SW to NE, EXCEPT on a couple of selected trains that are now pairs of voyagers. Great if you can be flexible and purposely travel on one of the 3 or 4 trains a day that are pairs, but not so good if your previous 5 car set is now a a 4 car set (as seems to be the case with most SW to NE services now).
Not so good if you select a 9 car train and carefully take up position in the rear 5 car unit - that is then removed at Derby and you have to stand in the leading 4 car like a sardine.
Not so good if you select a 9 car train and carefully take up position in the rear 5 car unit - that is then removed at Derby and you have to stand in the leading 4 car like a sardine.
As delightful as all of this sounds, I think I'm just going to keep flying to Bristol instead. Hopefully in a year or two they might have faintly got their act together.
As delightful as all of this sounds, I think I'm just going to keep flying to Bristol instead. Hopefully in a year or two they might have faintly got their act together.
Not so good if you select a 9 car train and carefully take up position in the rear 5 car unit - that is then removed at Derby and you have to stand in the leading 4 car like a sardine.
Or upon arrival, you find the front set locked out of use due to lack of staff... but nobody bothered to tell the waiting passengers and they have to all go running down the platform!
The previously discussed track access application lists all the changes including the ‘long distance routes’ having a capacity increase in May/June 2025. “Significant uplift of seating capacity on the long-distance network.” However it will not be exactly pre 2020, as it is also known (from the ECML thread) that on the Reading to Newcastle route some trains will not run north of York, it is also known that the Newcastle - Southampton extensions are no longer in the track access. (pdf attached below.)
The previously discussed track access application lists all the changes including the ‘long distance routes’ having a capacity increase in May/June 2025. “Significant uplift of seating capacity on the long-distance network.” However it will not be exactly pre 2020, as it is also known (from the ECML thread) that on the Reading to Newcastle route some trains will not run north of York, it is also known that the Newcastle - Southampton extensions are no longer in the track access.
Yes indeed. It was reported in Modern Railways a few months back that XC are intending to reinstate the Reading - NE services almost, but not quite, in full from May, giving that much needed restoration of two trains an hour on the Reading - Birmingham section.
There seems to be a drop in capacity on SW to NE, EXCEPT on a couple of selected trains that are now pairs of voyagers. Great if you can be flexible and purposely travel on one of the 3 or 4 trains a day that are pairs, but not so good if your previous 5 car set is now a a 4 car set (as seems to be the case with most SW to NE services now).
There are two fewer 4-car diagrams on the South West - North East route since the summer timetable started: One has become a 5-car and the other a double set. In fact, looking at Realtime Trains I think there's another diagram that was a single set south of Bristol that's currently a double all the way through to/from Plymouth, which would make it three fewer 4-car workings as far as the South West is concerned. It only requires a perusal of Realtime Trains to get an indication of the typical unit allocations for any given day: From Plymouth, single 4-car units on SW-NE services are very much in the minority.
Were there more double sets pre-Covid? The fact that Newcastle - Reading was hourly at the time, requiring more single sets than now, suggests that there would be fewer, even taking into account the couple of HST diagrams that existed then. Especially now that there are three extra trains to play with.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
Seems so, there are definitely a couple of extra double sets kicking about and some services that I used to know as 4-car workings are regularly running as 5-car since the timetable change.
There are two fewer 4-car diagrams on the South West - North East route since the summer timetable started: One has become a 5-car and the other a double set. In fact, looking at Realtime Trains I think there's another diagram that was a single set south of Bristol that's currently a double all the way through to/from Plymouth, which would make it three fewer 4-car workings as far as the South West is concerned. It only requires a perusal of Realtime Trains to get an indication of the typical unit allocations for any given day: From Plymouth, single 4-car units on SW-NE services are very much in the minority.
Were there more double sets pre-Covid? The fact that Newcastle - Reading was hourly at the time, requiring more single sets than now, suggests that there would be fewer, even taking into account the couple of HST diagrams that existed then. Especially now that there are three extra trains to play with.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
Seems so, there are definitely a couple of extra double sets kicking about and some services that I used to know as 4-car workings are regularly running as 5-car since the timetable change.
This doesn't seem to be reality though, just because something is booked a longer train, doesn't mean it always materialises. Certainly fewer 5 car sets around down here since June. Yes there are more double sets, but there are in reality more 4 car sets than before. If you are not flexible with when you can travel , a 4 car train is really quite unpleasant. Looking at a random day last week on RTT, it seems there was roughly a 50 50 split between 4 car voyagers and longer 5 or 8 car sets. Great if you can steer your journey toward the longer train, but if you can't, the 4 cars are just no good down this way anymore.
Were there more double sets pre-Covid? The fact that Newcastle - Reading was hourly at the time, requiring more single sets than now, suggests that there would be fewer, even taking into account the couple of HST diagrams that existed then. Especially now that there are three extra trains to play with.
I can only remember one double set pre-Covid, 1S49 1127 Plymouth to Edinburgh, with the addition of one summer timetable period when 1V54 0633 Dundee to Plymouth/Newquay ran as a pair of Voyagers instead of an HST.
Wasn't 1S35/1V66 a double set pre-Covid? Of course, it still is booked to be - even had a 10-car on it on July 4th, with the rear car locked out northbound due to platform lengths (1st class). The front unit was ex-Avanti (114), and the catering announcement was "shop in the front unit, at-seat trolley in the rear"... One 1st class carriage and 8 standard seemed a good balance, in retrospect!
I can only remember one double set pre-Covid, 1S49 1127 Plymouth to Edinburgh, with the addition of one summer timetable period when 1V54 0633 Dundee to Plymouth/Newquay ran as a pair of Voyagers instead of an HST.
Yeah, that 1S49 rings a bell for the sort of time of day I'd be travelling. I couldn't recall witnessing many double sets on NE-SW, but then I did tend to aim for the HST services when looking for a longer train where possible.
Wasn't 1S35/1V66 a double set pre-Covid? Of course, it still is booked to be - even had a 10-car on it on July 4th, with the rear car locked out northbound due to platform lengths (1st class). The front unit was ex-Avanti (114), and the catering announcement was "shop in the front unit, at-seat trolley in the rear"... One 1st class carriage and 8 standard seemed a good balance, in retrospect!
If XC could just tighten up the panels that would be a splendid start, the panels on this voyager seem to be competing as to what can rattle and shake the hardest; I think the window blind by the emergency exit is currently winning.
Got one of these just now, realtime trains says 221116. One big snag - no wifi. Is that normal for these transferred units?
Otherwise it's very nice, feels brighter, seats and carpet in much better condition etc. Just a pain that there's no wifi and mobile reception remains terrible due to the window coating
Got one of these just now, realtime trains says 221116. One big snag - no wifi. Is that normal for these transferred units?
Otherwise it's very nice, feels brighter, seats and carpet in much better condition etc. Just a pain that there's no wifi and mobile reception remains terrible due to the window coating
116 is one of the ex Avanti units, though I’m not sure if they’ve switched the WiFi over to XC yet. It was trying to use Avanti’s WiFi in Hampshire when I last used it.
Then again, I was in native 221120 yesterday and the WiFi wasn’t working in that either.
116 is one of the ex Avanti units, though I’m not sure if they’ve switched the WiFi over to XC yet. It was trying to use Avanti’s WiFi in Hampshire when I last used it.
Then again, I was in native 221120 yesterday and the WiFi wasn’t working in that either.
It could mean extra jobs when the work starts next year - just two months after the future of the Derby factory was settled
www.derbytelegraph.co.uk
Derby train maker Alstom has signed a new £60 million contract to refurbish CrossCountry’s Voyager trains over the next two years. The work will see the trains receive an interior refresh – including new seats and tables – while their exteriors will be repainted in CrossCountry’s new livery.
Work on the the latest contract for the Voyager trains, which will take place at the company's Litchurch Lane factory, will be offered to existing staff but it is likely that additional recruitment will take place – particularly for specific skillsets.
I hope that they propose strip out and replacement of least one of the unnecessary accessible toilets, two on the five-car units and addition of more seats or luggage racks in their place, obviously, the accessible toilet in first class and in standard near the wheelchair space will need to remain
I hope that they propose strip out and replacement of least one of the unnecessary accessible toilets, two on the five-car units and addition of more seats or luggage racks in their place, obviously, the accessible toilet in first class and in standard near the wheelchair space will need to remain
Genuine question as l don't get to use XC that often. To what extent is the current toilet provision driven by the length of journey and current depot set-ups? How often are toilets out of use due to full tanks on XC? Would such a removal pose future issues?
It would be bloody unfunny having a train run from the South of England to Scotland with no functional toilets for a large part of the way.
In any event l seriously doubt that a total £60M refurbishment budget anywhere near covers removing toilets.
Not sure if anyone has seen this (if it has sorry for the duplication), but a tweet by Tim Dunn lays out the details of what we can expect from the refurbishment and a little video of the mock up interiors.
Genuine question as l don't get to use XC that often. To what extent is the current toilet provision driven by the length of journey and current depot set-ups? How often are toilets out of use due to full tanks on XC? Would such a removal pose future issues?
It would be bloody unfunny having a train run from the South of England to Scotland with no functional toilets for a large part of the way.
In any event l seriously doubt that a total £60M refurbishment budget anywhere near covers removing toilets.
The aim isn't to get rid of toilets, it's to replace at one of the 3 accessible toilets with a non-accessible toilet which could take less than half the room in the cabin. Nobody has figured out a way to store luggage below the sole-bar yet, so presumably the space for 3 toilet tanks will still be there, and the tanking setups at depots would be unchanged.
Genuine question as l don't get to use XC that often. To what extent is the current toilet provision driven by the length of journey and current depot set-ups? How often are toilets out of use due to full tanks on XC? Would such a removal pose future issues?
It would be bloody unfunny having a train run from the South of England to Scotland with no functional toilets for a large part of the way.
In any event l seriously doubt that a total £60M refurbishment budget anywhere near covers removing toilets.
I agree, it's pretty much certain that £60m won't include any significant toilet work.
Completely removing a toilet probably wouldn't be a great idea either. Reconfiguration of 1 or 2 into smaller, non-PRM toilets might be possible, but I would imagine also costly and would probably only practically free up space for another luggage rack (not the worst idea for XC, but still...)
RailUK was launched on 6th June 2005 - so we've hit 20 years being the UK's most popular railway community! Read more and celebrate this milestone with us in this thread!