• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Caledonian Sleeper bidders named

Status
Not open for further replies.

marks87

Established Member
Joined
23 Jun 2010
Messages
1,609
Location
Dundee
First
Arriva Night Trains
Serco

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-business-23105287

Caledonian sleeper train service bidders named

Three firms are in the running to take over the Caledonian sleeper train service, the Scottish government has announced.

Aberdeen-based First Group, which already runs the service, is facing competition from Arriva Night Trains and Serco.

The Caledonian franchise connects Inverness, Fort William, Aberdeen, Edinburgh and Glasgow to London.

The new 15-year franchise is expected to start in April 2015...

(read more)
When is the franchise due to start? The main article says 2015, but the caption under the (horribly generic) photo says "next year".
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

WillPS

Established Member
Joined
18 Nov 2008
Messages
2,421
Location
Nottingham
What is the benefit of having the sleeper services in a separate franchise rather than the Scotrail franchise?

What's the benefit of having it as part of the Scotrail franchise? There are no other similar services in the Scotrail network, half or more of the journey is outside the ScotRail map, the rolling stock is completely different to anything else ScotRail use, the service is staffed separately...
 

Mojo

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
7 Aug 2005
Messages
20,398
Location
0035
What is the benefit of having the sleeper services in a separate franchise rather than the Scotrail franchise?

http://www.transportscotland.gov.uk/rail/scottish-franchise-renewal-programme

''The Ministerial decision to create a separate Caledonian Sleeper Franchise has taken in order to obtain more focused management of the Sleeper operation and in conjunction with capital investment to develop a transformed product offering that will secure its future as a sustainable business. A transformation of the existing Sleeper offering is required with refurbishment/replacement of the existing rolling stock and at the terminals in order to provide enhanced passenger facilities and wider choice of traveling class.''

More info is available at http://www.transportscotland.gov.uk...enewal-programme/Caledonian-Slepper-Franchise
 

Blindtraveler

Established Member
Joined
28 Feb 2011
Messages
9,677
Location
Nowhere near enough to a Pacer :(
Arriva Night Trains :P I can imagine this being a Voyager ;)



I would agree! As for Serco, they will probs do what they have done with the northern isles Orkney and Shetland ferries - strip away all the good bits of the service, ailionate the staff, infuriate the unions and wack up the prices!

Gotta be first Im afraid!


--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
What's the benefit of having it as part of the Scotrail franchise? There are no other similar services in the Scotrail network, half or more of the journey is outside the ScotRail map, the rolling stock is completely different to anything else ScotRail use, the service is staffed separately...



not entirely correct Re staffing, train guards from the regular pool including I think 1 forum member sign sleapers and I believe some Glasgow and Fortwilliam drivers do also with a Glasgow man bringing the 18:21X Glq As far as Rannoch where he swaps with an F W Man who has brought the beds down.
 

lyndhurst25

Established Member
Joined
26 Nov 2010
Messages
1,413
Is the Paddington - Penzance sleeper staying as part of the Great Western franchise then?
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
27,686
Location
Redcar
Yes. Until the franchise competition was cancelled it was made a franchise commitment of the future GW franchise which was nice to see.
 

Yew

Established Member
Joined
12 Mar 2011
Messages
6,551
Location
UK
Does this mean the refurbishment will be held off until the new franchise?
 

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
16,739
This will make the subsidy for the service far more apparent than it is now.
Allowing it to be axed as part of future High Speed rail commitments.
 

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
9,293
Location
Between Edinburgh and Exeter
First
Arriva Night Trains
Serco

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-business-23105287

When is the franchise due to start? The main article says 2015, but the caption under the (horribly generic) photo says "next year".

That's funny, as either the BBC Article is wrong or Roger Ford is wrong. Informed Sources this week said:

Rolling stock developments
Time to catch up with a couple of slow-burning rolling stock prospects, starting with the Caledonian Sleeper service which is being offered as a separate franchise.
Pre-Qualification Questionnaires were returned on May 22 and four potential bidders have come forward. According to Informed Sources, they are Arriva, First Group, Great Scottish Railways and Serco.
Great Scottish Railways? In a blast from the past two of the founding fathers of GB Railways, Michael Schabas and Max Steinkopf, are back in the hunt. If they pre-qualify that should liven things up no end

Now if true, this could be interesting. First Group Vs the former GB Railways founders / management. One to come back and haunt First? My main preference would be GB Railways or First - First at least for now, still run Scotrail so should allow some flexibility between SR and the caley sleeper. Arriva or Serco, no thanks. I could almost imagine that the catering would be reduced on Arriva, and near non existent on Serco, or just completely contracted out to someone like Rail Gourmet.
 

Oliver

Member
Joined
17 Aug 2007
Messages
476
This will make the subsidy for the service far more apparent than it is now.
Allowing it to be axed as part of future High Speed rail commitments.

Well the true cost of running the sleepers has been difficult to establish in the past, and they undoubtedly require a significant subsidy per head. Whoever wins will surely want to get more people travelling overnight, whether seated or in bed, to bring the subsidy more in line with daytime services.

There is some information here: http://www.transportscotland.gov.uk...enewal-programme/Caledonian-Slepper-Franchise (the mis-spelling in the URL is correct) but there are a various exclusions in the costs shown. Based on the subsidy figure shown of £5 million per year, that is about £8,000 per service. If the train is carrying 150 people that's about £50 subsidy per head.
 
Last edited:

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
19,693
Location
Mold, Clwyd
That's funny, as either the BBC Article is wrong or Roger Ford is wrong. Informed Sources this week said:

They are probably both right.
Roger was identifying the bidders for the pre-qualification process.
The BBC was identifying those who had been qualified in by the Scottish Government (ie GSR was qualified out).
 

matchmaker

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2009
Messages
1,512
Location
Central Scotland
The next stage will be the tender process. I wonder what the price/quality split will be.....................just checked the notice and it appears it is price only.
 

Blindtraveler

Established Member
Joined
28 Feb 2011
Messages
9,677
Location
Nowhere near enough to a Pacer :(
on that basis and given the Scottish Gov's past history its between Serco and Ariva. Serco were awarded the Scottish Government Orkney and Shetland Lifeline Ferry contract a year ago and whilst the spin machine would have us believe otherwise the deterioration in onboard service, sise in costs to customers, cutback in dry docking and industrial relations issues we have had with Serco make me certain it was purely on cost. Likewise wev seen what a mess Ariva can make of things with X C. First will be costly but they wil invest and look how good FGWs product now is?
 

Aictos

Established Member
Joined
28 Apr 2009
Messages
10,403
IF one of the conditions of the franchise was the wholesale replacement of the existing stock or part replacement, what could we see?

Would they just keep the existing stock and just refurbish it or would they look into new built stock?
 
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
411
It would be nice if the new service combined the friendliness of the Night Riviera with the lounge carriages (with sofas) on the Highland Sleeper.

If Serco's current Northern Rail franchise is anything to go by, we'd be better off without them winning the Caledonian Sleeper service.
 

YorkshireBear

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2010
Messages
8,692
It would be nice if the new service combined the friendliness of the Night Riviera with the lounge carriages (with sofas) on the Highland Sleeper.

If Serco's current Northern Rail franchise is anything to go by, we'd be better off without them winning the Caledonian Sleeper service.

I dont think it is anything to go by. Local and regional services on a no growth commuter franchise compared to a flagship sleeper route. Not really comparable.
 

SprinterMan

Established Member
Joined
20 Sep 2010
Messages
2,341
Location
Hertford
on that basis and given the Scottish Gov's past history its between Serco and Ariva. Serco were awarded the Scottish Government Orkney and Shetland Lifeline Ferry contract a year ago and whilst the spin machine would have us believe otherwise the deterioration in onboard service, sise in costs to customers, cutback in dry docking and industrial relations issues we have had with Serco make me certain it was purely on cost. Likewise wev seen what a mess Ariva can make of things with X C. First will be costly but they wil invest and look how good FGWs product now is?

To be fair, XC is better now that it was under Virgin. It is still nothing special, but at least it works now.

Adam :D
 

rebmcr

Established Member
Joined
15 Nov 2011
Messages
3,851
Location
St Neots
This will make the subsidy for the service far more apparent than it is now.
Allowing it to be axed as part of future High Speed rail commitments.

IIRC it's quite popular with MPs, perhaps giving it a better than fighting chance.
 

bnm

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2009
Messages
4,996
on that basis and given the Scottish Gov's past history its between Serco and Ariva. Serco were awarded the Scottish Government Orkney and Shetland Lifeline Ferry contract a year ago and whilst the spin machine would have us believe otherwise the deterioration in onboard service, sise in costs to customers, cutback in dry docking and industrial relations issues we have had with Serco make me certain it was purely on cost. Likewise wev seen what a mess Ariva can make of things with X C. First will be costly but they wil invest and look how good FGWs product now is?

Interesting that you are down on Serco, yet praise FGW. The former provides the latter's customer service!
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
IF one of the conditions of the franchise was the wholesale replacement of the existing stock or part replacement, what could we see?

Would they just keep the existing stock and just refurbish it or would they look into new built stock?

There is an investment of £50-60 million from Holyrood and £50 million from Westminster allied to the new franchise for just that. Either toward comprehensive refurbishment or new rolling stock.
 

transmanche

Established Member
Joined
27 Feb 2011
Messages
6,018
If Serco's current Northern Rail franchise is anything to go by, we'd be better off without them winning the Caledonian Sleeper service.
I think one thing we've all learned from rail privatisation is that you can't assume that one parent group's performance on TOC A will bear any similarity to the same group's performance on TOC B.

Take First Group. Is their performance on Hull Trains anything like Capital Connect or Transpennine Express?

Similarly is the performance on Serco/Abellio-operated Northern directly comparable with the Serco/Abellio-operated Merseyrail? Or the Serco-operated DLR?
 

Muzer

Established Member
Joined
3 Feb 2012
Messages
2,773
For the biggest contrast, NXEA vs c2c is always the best.
 

34D

Established Member
Joined
9 Feb 2011
Messages
6,042
Location
Yorkshire
When is the vote on Scottish devolution again?

As much as I love travelling on both sleeper routes, I can't see any economic justification for them :(
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
27,686
Location
Redcar
As much as I love travelling on both sleeper routes, I can't see any economic justification for them

If by both you mean Night Riviera and Caledonian then my understanding is that the Night Riviera is much healthier financially than the Caledonian. After all it wasn't part of FGWs franchise agreement to run it but they've persevered with it .
 

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
16,739
Caledonian Sleeper is far more complex operationally than the Night Riviera.
 

IanXC

Emeritus Moderator
Joined
18 Dec 2009
Messages
6,339
Caledonian Sleeper is far more complex operationally than the Night Riviera.

Although the Caledonian has probably always been more complex, FGW did significantly simplify the Night Riviera. The Lowland for instance, if operated via the East Coast, could drop off the Edinburgh portion (left with a shore supply) and work through to Glasgow - I suspect that the bidders have come up with some interesting ways to cut costs from the operation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top