• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Entire 800/801/802 fleet stood down for safety checks

Status
Not open for further replies.

Davester50

Member
Joined
22 Feb 2021
Messages
862
Location
UK
A Twitter search for "800 (from:lner)" reveals that during the entire history of the Twitter account, @LNER (presumably originally under different name when it was VTEC) have beginning from 2014 made posts mentioning "800" (in the context of Class 800) a total of 34 times, of which 10 were in the last two days (and the last one before those was 6 months ago). Of these 34 posts, 8 also included the word "azuma", none of which in the last two days. It could certainly be argued that this inconsistency in terminology is confusing to the average traveller.
Completely agree.

LNER Twitter in January 2020

People know what an Azuma looks like, not everyone knows what a Class 800 is. This joke is accessible to everyone, not just train enthusiasts. ^BG

Which proves they're doing their best to avoid tainting the brand name.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

TT-ONR-NRN

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
11,733
Location
Salford Quays, Manchester
On returning 91s to service will LNER be changing the diagrams to keep them away from Newcastle/Edinburgh services, as they interwork at the moment due to limited platform availability at King’s Cross? There’s very few captive South of York diagrams that don’t end up at Bounds Green or Doncaster (Azuma only Depots)
 

spark001uk

Established Member
Joined
20 Aug 2010
Messages
2,356
Thanks ! Yes Friday looks the better bet - although she may have already brought her ticket ( I know fridays are more expensive) I don't think the Waterloo - Exeter trains even have a catering trolley anymore ?

Irony is she was going to drive, but thought going by train would be less stressful! I did have a look at National Express to Exeter, but don't think the 787 Cambridge - Heathrow is running to connect to the Exeter Coach, and pick up the train at St Davids.
I would imagine under the circumstances if already purchased, her ticket could be changed? Not 100% sure.
As for catering, I think it's still suspended on pretty much all TOCs?
Coach is always an option if a suitable route can be found, if rail ticket can be refunded (if already bought).
 

pelli

Member
Joined
15 Sep 2016
Messages
316
A Twitter search for "800 (from:lner)" reveals that during the entire history of the Twitter account, @LNER (presumably originally under different name when it was VTEC) have beginning from 2014 made posts mentioning "800" (in the context of Class 800) a total of 34 times, of which 10 were in the last two days (and the last one before those was 6 months ago). Of these 34 posts, 8 also included the word "azuma", none of which in the last two days. It could certainly be argued that this inconsistency in terminology is confusing to the average traveller.

Completely agree.

LNER Twitter in January 2020 said:
People know what an Azuma looks like, not everyone knows what a Class 800 is. This joke is accessible to everyone, not just train enthusiasts. ^BG

Which proves they're doing their best to avoid tainting the brand name.

Things are even worse on their own website: Searching "800 site:lner.co.uk" reveals that their website only contains the text "800" in the correct context three times:

"Azuma train (800 101) has been decorated with a dedicated poppy design"
"This guide will help you understand the layout of our Class 800/801 'Azuma' fleet of trains."
"Disruption was caused by a number of Hitachi Class 800 trains being removed from service"

Obviously, only one of these pages doesn't also contain the word "Azuma".
 

DelW

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2015
Messages
4,841
I don't think the Waterloo - Exeter trains even have a catering trolley anymore ?
AFAIK there's no catering on any SWR services now (which I think is permanent not a Covid temporary move).
 

Steve Harris

Member
Joined
11 Dec 2016
Messages
1,020
Location
ECML
The aircraft industry are past masters of investigating monocoque structural cracking including the use of repetitive destructive testing in a rig to handle large pieces of aluminium. Does Hitachi or other railway body have such equipment and expertise?
I was wondering the same thing tbh.

I have personally seen 2 C130 wings in a rig (attached to a centre wing) and by using hydraulic rams, being "flapped" like a bird (thereby simulating the stresses of taking off, flight and landing etc). All the data being logged by strain gauges and visual/NDT inspections carried out.

This testing actually lengthened the time between inspections (as they had actual data rather than just calculations and theory to go on).

I wonder if an Azuma carriage has ever been flexed in a similar rig to simulate various travel cycles.
 

Hadders

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
27 Apr 2011
Messages
16,485
Thanks ! Yes Friday looks the better bet - although she may have already brought her ticket ( I know fridays are more expensive) I don't think the Waterloo - Exeter trains even have a catering trolley anymore ?

Irony is she was going to drive, but thought going by train would be less stressful! I did have a look at National Express to Exeter, but don't think the 787 Cambridge - Heathrow is running to connect to the Exeter Coach, and pick up the train at St Davids.
Couple of options if GWR isn't an option, depending on the ticket held:

1. Travel Stevenage to London then Waterloo to Exeter with SWR (change at Salisbury), then to Falmouth
2. Travel Stevenage to Peterborough, then Peterborough to Birmingham New Street, then Birmingham New Street to Truro, and Truro to Falmouth
 

randyrippley

Established Member
Joined
21 Feb 2016
Messages
5,383
The aircraft industry are past masters of investigating monocoque structural cracking including the use of repetitive destructive testing in a rig to handle large pieces of aluminium. Does Hitachi or other railway body have such equipment and expertise? Should they bring in BAE to help with investigation if not?
Boscombe Down has the expertise
 

Taunton

Established Member
Joined
1 Aug 2013
Messages
11,209
As well as the obfuscation about whether the defective trains are Class 800, or Azuma, or IET, or all of these, there is also the issue of actual ownership and responsibility for them. As I understand it this belongs to Agility Trains Ltd, despite all the public notices referring to Hitachi, who are a major but not the only owner of Agility; the latter have just subcontracted their construction to the Hitachi company.

If the costs of defect remediation turns out to be substantial, I wonder what the DfT has in place to guard against Agility thinking it's not worth their while to do the work, and declaring bankruptcy.
 

Ashley Hill

Established Member
Joined
8 Dec 2019
Messages
4,214
Location
The West Country
Yes I'm aware - guard training has started.
Thanks to you and Mag_seven for confining that. Presumably that would be Swindon guards initially. Are 387s cleared for S Wales yet. There was always talk of using them on rugby specials etc,could the IET issue see them running through the tunnel now guards are learning them?
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
21,353
Thanks to you and Mag7 for confining that. Presumably that would be Swindon guards initially. Are 387s cleared for S Wales yet. There was always talk of using them on rugby specials etc,could the IET issue see them running through the tunnel now guards are learning them?
It is reported that the paperwork isn't yet in place for 387s to go west of Swindon, the drivers who could take them west currently only sign as far as Bristol Parkway even if the paperwork was in place.
 

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
9,519
Location
London
Thanks to you and Mag_seven for confining that. Presumably that would be Swindon guards initially. Are 387s cleared for S Wales yet. There was always talk of using them on rugby specials etc,could the IET issue see them running through the tunnel now guards are learning them?

Swindon and Reading I believe. Yep all those plans are somewhere in the ether, Covid naturally putting a halt to some of them.
 

Steve Harris

Member
Joined
11 Dec 2016
Messages
1,020
Location
ECML
As well as the obfuscation about whether the defective trains are Class 800, or Azuma, or IET, or all of these, there is also the issue of actual ownership and responsibility for them. As I understand it this belongs to Agility Trains Ltd, despite all the public notices referring to Hitachi, who are a major but not the only owner of Agility; the latter have just subcontracted their construction to the Hitachi company.

If the costs of defect remediation turns out to be substantial, I wonder what the DfT has in place to guard against Agility thinking it's not worth their while to do the work, and declaring bankruptcy.
Apart from (according to Companies House) Agility Trains Ltd was dissolved in 2015!
However there are company's called Agility Trains East Ltd & Agility Trains West Ltd, along with Holding companies to boot, so I'm pressuming it will be 1 or more of them Dft will be talking to.

Btw @Taunton I know what your saying, I'm just trying to clear up a clerical error.
 
Last edited:

Pokelet

Member
Joined
5 Sep 2017
Messages
156
Just to give an indication of how seriously Hitachi are taking this, one of the "marooned" sets moved up from Temple Meads to Stoke Gifford today at a max speed of 5 mph. I believe it was due to go out in service yesterday when the message was passed to the driver that it his service was cancelled, and not to be moved anywhere.

Crikey, it'll take days for the sets at Worcester to get there then
 

43094

Member
Joined
19 May 2010
Messages
938
To answer a question up thread, MK4 diagrams won’t go north of York.

There is a way to do this with the plan for this coming week(days), on the proviso that no more than 2 MK4 diagrams would be in use on any given day.
 

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
9,882
Location
Hampshire
Can they not be inspected by a "man in a van" in the yard at Worcester, and only go to Bristol if repairs are needed?

Unlikely I would have thought - it all needs NDT (Non Destructive Testing) which will probably need to be done over a pit to reach the harder to see areas.
 

snowball

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2013
Messages
8,111
Location
Leeds
As well as the obfuscation about whether the defective trains are Class 800, or Azuma, or IET, or all of these, there is also the issue of actual ownership and responsibility for them. As I understand it this belongs to Agility Trains Ltd, despite all the public notices referring to Hitachi, who are a major but not the only owner of Agility; the latter have just subcontracted their construction to the Hitachi company.

If the costs of defect remediation turns out to be substantial, I wonder what the DfT has in place to guard against Agility thinking it's not worth their while to do the work, and declaring bankruptcy.
Does Agility (with detailed name corrected as in #1173) own all the 80x's, or, as I would have thought, only the 800s and 801s that are part of deals with the DfT, as distinct from the 802s, 803s, 805s, 807s and 810s?
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
21,353
Does Agility (with detailed name corrected as in #1103) own all the 80x's, or, as I would have thought, only the 800s and 801s that are part of deals with the DfT, as distinct from the 802s, 803s, 805s, 807s and 810s?
GWR Class 802 leased from Eversholt
TPE and Hull Trains Class 802 leased from Angel Trains
East Coast Trains Class 803 leased from Beacon Rail
Avanti Class 805 and 807 leased from Rock Rail West Coast
EMR Class 810 leased from Rock Rail East Midlands
 

Snow1964

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2019
Messages
8,313
Location
West Wiltshire
Just to give an indication of how seriously Hitachi are taking this, one of the "marooned" sets moved up from Temple Meads to Stoke Gifford today at a max speed of 5 mph. I believe it was due to go out in service yesterday when the message was passed to the driver that it his service was cancelled, and not to be moved anywhere.

I would love to know the science behind that 5mph, if day before were doing 125mph. Used to be dynamic loading was related to square of the speed, so someone has decided load on the brackets needs to be under 1/600 of the day before.

Obviously a visual inspection to ensure not completely broken and hanging off (where it could catch something), but I fail to see why they can’t be used in a speed restricted mode of something like 50mph if they pass a no visible (to the eye) cracks test.
 
Joined
11 Sep 2020
Messages
26
Location
Derby
The monitoring that Bill was referring to was that of the quality of raw materials received by the train manufacturer (As referred to in the article linked in #1006) rather than any routine inspection of the finished stock.
Metallurgical analysis of the materials used may well be useful, but obviously that would require the disposal of a significant part.
That may eventually be necessary in order to to determine whether this problem is a design, materials, manufacturing or even a usage / maintenance process issue.
This is it plus if you recognise that certain parts are likely to have material defects, instigating a rolling programme of replacing them to parts that are confirmed to be up to standard rather than waiting for faults to develop seems to be the safest course of action.

We are exceptionally lucky here that there was only cracking observed. The problem with material stress is that there are a lot of factors that govern it, and a shear incident can occur before cracks are even testable if material defects are present in the bulk of the material.
 

73128

Member
Joined
8 Dec 2019
Messages
452
Location
Reading
First up GWR IET this morning 0554 IL01 Bristol Parkway (BPW) to Reading (RDG) has recently left 61 late, behind the 0700 (1L05). 0522 1B00 Paddington to Newport also heading down right now (but 26 late leaving BPW with a fairly tight turn round due at NWP into 0726 1L07 back up to RDG).

At least three sets are safe to be allowed out.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top