Do you live in Stranraer or anywhere near the Stranraer line?
I live in Belfast, and am a regular SailRail user.
Do you live in Stranraer or anywhere near the Stranraer line?
There is a sign up on P4 at Ayr above the "doghouse" and I wouldn't say the staff are that unhelpful, but equally ths is not the US of A with some high school poppet dressed in a tartan skirt saying "Rail and Sail, sure just go right on out through the exit there and the bus is right in front of you. Have a nice day".
The whole point is that these inconveniences only started a couple of years ago, when some genius gave Stena planning permission to move a ferry port without any consideration of whether it was still integrated with the public transport network /facepalms
If they hadn't got permission Stena would have walked away from the North Channel.
Stranraer has draught restrictions which limited the vessels they could use. In addition the shorter passage time economises on bunkers and allows a regular interval service with two identical larger compatible vessels replacing three very different ones, two of which were life expired.
The rail connected traffic just wasn't important enough to outweigh these factors.
the whole thing is so badly, half-arsededly run.
There's no signs up saying "SAIL RAIL CONNECTION COACH THIS WAY >>"
no staff standing around to show anyone where to go, or what to get on.
Do you live in Stranraer or anywhere near the Stranraer line?
Not unhelpful, but very little of the simple positive things that could be done... for instance, the guard on the train at Ayr announcing that passengers for SailRail should alight here and go and stand in the carpark () or a sign or announcement at Glasgow Central for SailRail too as well as for the airport.
Stena leaving Stranraer was probably not the issue. Conveying the small percentage of foot passengers was. And of course it now costs Stena the thin end of £100k extra to operate it.
Yes. It is my local railway.Purely out of interest, do you?
I think that the costs of bussing rail pax to Ayr is probably all part and parcel of the overall costs of relocating. They would have known that bussing pax to Stranraer for rail connections probably wasn't sustainable, because of the overall longer journey time and irregularity of the rail service. You might as well make it a little bit better and convenient for those passengers who do choose that route and bus them to Ayr. As I say, they must have accepted this inevitability as part of the relocation (they can't just stop rail & sail traffic - even though it is a minority market)... yes, despite slight added inconvenience that passengers have to change at Ayr. But it's still a shorter route.
At the end of the day, passengers do and have voted with their feet and many now prefer straight through express coach services. But equally, the rise in vehicle and freight traffic since the relocation also speaks volumes.
I emailed ScotRail about this a few days ago and they said no, SailRail only covers you on the Ayr coach, and if you wanted to use rail to Stranraer and the No.350 bus, you'd have to pay extra.
The decision to remove the option of travelling by rail to Stranraer for SailRail passengers is something I can't fathom. What is the downside for ScotRail? Were the citizens of Stranraer sneakily using cheap SailRail tickets and then not actually getting on the ferry? Forking out an extra £10+ for an Ayr to Stranraer train ticket is surely going to put off people, who are unwilling or unable to use the Ayr coach, from using the whole SailRail scheme.
The decision to remove the option of travelling by rail to Stranraer for SailRail passengers is something I can't fathom. What is the downside for ScotRail? Were the citizens of Stranraer sneakily using cheap SailRail tickets and then not actually getting on the ferry? Forking out an extra £10+ for an Ayr to Stranraer train ticket is surely going to put off people, who are unwilling or unable to use the Ayr coach, from using the whole SailRail scheme.
As for the electrification to Girvan option that would lead to line closure south of Girvan. It is also not practicable
People will just drive to Girvan! It is 45/50 minutes by road as apposed to 52/55 by rail, there will always be more services from Girvan
The real odd thing of course is that providing an express coach service between Scrabster and Inverness was vetoed in the Scottish Strategic Transport Projects review as "undermining the rail service" despite it taking nearly an hour quicker. Yet the same logic does not apply at Cairnryan where the road advantage is nothing like as great. Funny old world.
That's no fun! Like, if someone wants to travel by the old rail and sea route from London to Paris, even though the Eurostar has more or less destroyed that market, then it should still be possible to get a train to Dover Western Docks, walk across to a ferry, alight at Calais and walk straight on to Calais Maritime for a fast train to Paris
No, what I'd *really* like the answer to be was "obviously as part of the integrated national transport plan, when we upgraded and moved the ferry port, we extended the rail line too and built a new station integrated into the port"
More generally, when I make a rail journey, I don't want to get off the train, stand in a carpark in the rain and get on a bus
Interesting debate ,i can't help thinking a tiny fraction of the HS2 budget would restore the old military railway to Cairnryan
I still think ferry traffic is never coming back south of Girvan so the sooner supporters of the line start coming up with positive plans for the line involving local journeys and tourism the better. Moaning about ferry traffic being lost isn't going to achieve anything.
The whole point is that these inconveniences only started a couple of years ago, when some genius gave Stena planning permission to move a ferry port without any consideration of whether it was still integrated with the public transport network /facepalms
ths is not the US of A with some high school poppet dressed in a tartan skirt saying "Rail and Sail, sure just go right on out through the exit there and the bus is right in front of you. Have a nice day"
Not unhelpful, but very little of the simple positive things that could be done... for instance, the guard on the train at Ayr announcing that passengers for SailRail should alight here and go and stand in the carpark () or a sign or announcement at Glasgow Central for SailRail too as well as for the airport
If they hadn't got permission Stena would have walked away from the North Channel.
Stranraer has draught restrictions which limited the vessels they could use. In addition the shorter passage time economises on bunkers and allows a regular interval service with two identical larger compatible vessels replacing three very different ones, two of which were life expired.
The rail connected traffic just wasn't important enough to outweigh these factors.
Stena had to leave Stranraer. I think that the costs of bussing rail pax to Ayr is probably all part and parcel of the overall costs of relocating. They would have known that bussing pax to Stranraer for rail connections probably wasn't sustainable, because of the overall longer journey time and irregularity of the rail service. You might as well make it a little bit better and convenient for those passengers who do choose that route and bus them to Ayr. As I say, they must have accepted this inevitability as part of the relocation (they can't just stop rail & sail traffic - even though it is a minority market)... yes, despite slight added inconvenience that passengers have to change at Ayr
The decision to remove the option of travelling by rail to Stranraer for SailRail passengers is something I can't fathom. What is the downside for ScotRail? Were the citizens of Stranraer sneakily using cheap SailRail tickets and then not actually getting on the ferry? Forking out an extra £10+ for an Ayr to Stranraer train ticket is surely going to put off people, who are unwilling or unable to use the Ayr coach, from using the whole SailRail scheme.
Remind us again what ScotRail have to do with this?
It was Stena's decision to relocate to Cairnryan, and also Stena's decision to provide a coach-link to Ayr for rail paying passengers
Meanwhile P&O have yet to reply to me asking them why they don't accept SailRail tickets.
If FSR are only getting revenue from the SailRail scheme to cover passengers as far as Ayr then why should they allow passengers to travel "free" from Ayr to Stranraer?
To make the SailRail scheme more attractive to passengers, sell more tickets and consequently earn more money?
Why should they accept them?.
I feel like I'm repeating myself. Going from Ayr to Cairnryan via Stranraer would not, most likely make it more attractive to passengers.
To make the SailRail scheme more attractive to passengers, sell more tickets and consequently earn more money?
Meanwhile P&O have yet to reply to me asking them why they don't accept SailRail tickets.
Why should they accept them? I can understand Stena Line accepting them from buying Sea Link. P&O are an independent company who have decided that as things stand there is no business case to accept Rail Sail. I have no idea how the fare is divided between the train companies, UK and Ireland and the ferry operator.
I feel like I'm repeating myself. Going from Ayr to Cairnryan via Stranraer would not, most likely make it more attractive to passengers.
Maybe because AS THEY SEE IT the question is irrelevent and has nothing to do with them and they can't be bothered spending management time composing a reply?
Exactly - I believe at some point in the past through rail/fast ferry tickets were marketed on their seasonal Troon - Larne route with a shuttle bus from Troon Station to the ferry terminal.
. However there is nothing to stop you booking rail and ferry seperately and making your own way between Troon station and terminal- they're certainly closer together than Stranraer station and Cairnryan!
Why should Irish Ferries accept them? Why should Arriva Trains Wales accept them? Why is the sky blue? :roll:
I think it's pretty reasonable question to ask a cross-Irish-Sea-ferry-operator why they don't participate in a scheme participated in by all the other cross-Irish-Sea-ferry-operators.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Yes, you do keep repeating yourself, insisting that people wanting to travel by train shouldn't mind having to get off the train and on a bus,
when in reality, having to get off a train and onto the dreaded "rail replacement bus" is one of the most hated things known by any passenger.:roll:
What a bizarre attitude.
What is Bizarre about a Business deciding that a product is not going to return enough profit for them to get involved?
Businesses do it all the time!
Indeed, rail tickets are usually valid for "any reasonable route"
Why should they accept them? I can understand Stena Line accepting them from buying Sea Link. P&O are an independent company who have decided that as things stand there is no business case to accept Rail Sail. I have no idea how the fare is divided between the train companies, UK and Ireland and the ferry operator.
If they were, when noticing a demand for their product (e.g. full to bursting at Christmas), they'd try to retain those customers by improving the service offered to them, and trying to entice passengers to come use it at other times, having been wowed by the wonderful time they had at Christmas.
I have some sympathy with this argument however a company will match capacity to the normal level of demand however it's unrealistic to have excess capacity lying idle that is only used once of twice a year, on the off chance that another form of transport may be disrupted.
I was talking about *your* attitude (that it was a daft question to ask and ridiculous to expect a reply) not P&O's.
If P&O Customer Services sent me a quick email saying "Dear feline1, thank you for your interest. We have found that it was not cost effective for us to participate in this scheme" that would be disappointing for me, but perfectly understandable.
Hah.
One thing this thread demonstrates quite clearly, despite all the blether about "market forces", is that train operating companies are not run like proper capitalist businesses at all.
If they were, when noticing a demand for their product (e.g. full to bursting at Christmas), they'd try to retain those customers by improving the service offered to them, and trying to entice passengers to come use it at other times, having been wowed by the wonderful time they had at Christmas.
I don't think P&O Irish Sea have any links back to British Rail.
P&O do accept foot passengers on that route,
so it does not seem unreasonable that they should sell them tickets or answer their emails...
Yes but do you acknowledge that in the cut-throat struggle for commercial traffic - the traffic for which the route exists - they might have an excuse for not worrying too much about getting involved in RailSail?
Not only that but in the wider Irish Sea sense they are both suffering severe competition from SEATRUCK whose business model excludes everything except Trucks and unaccompanied Trailers and are therefore able to offer very competitive commercial rates which both P&O and Stena are really stuggling to meet.
To further add to the confusion, the Cairnryan - Belfast route is no longer shown or mentioned on www.sailrail.co.uk, with no explanation for the change. How extremely helpful