sprinterguy
Established Member
Just Leeds: The Airedale and Wharfedale services specifically. You might be thinking of the 3-car 323s that operate out of Piccadilly.Yeah and even they are centralised in Manchester Leeds etc
Just Leeds: The Airedale and Wharfedale services specifically. You might be thinking of the 3-car 323s that operate out of Piccadilly.Yeah and even they are centralised in Manchester Leeds etc
Just Leeds: The Airedale and Wharfedale services specifically. You might be thinking of the 3-car 323s that operate out of Piccadilly.
Yeah and even they are centralised in Manchester Leeds etc
Yeah and even they are centralised in Manchester Leeds etc
Yep with the 323s (operating on selected routes out of Manchester Picc) being ex-BR stock from the early 1990s, the same sort of age as the 165s.
A 333 can appear on a Leeds-Doncaster service but that is rare and it's usually 321s and soon to be 322s as well.
333s only work between Leeds and Bradford FS/Skipton/Ilkley. Plus the north east already has mostly Pacers, so having a few more isn't going to have that much of an effect.
Exactly! But I'll wager that the seven returned from FGW will have no effect on Pacer workings in the North East, being as they were Newton Heath units before they transferred away, and having all graduated back there now to the best of my knowledge. It'll still be all single 142s through Middlesborough and Newcastle no doubt. Of course there aren't the same problems of capacity in the north east as there are in Leeds and Manchester, but throwing Heaton a few "scraps" from Newton Heaths' table might be nice to allow a couple of doubled up Pacer workings to run through Newcastle in the peaks.2 pacers are better than 1!
Well, that's better than nothing. Though that'll probably be the extent of the handful of "additional carriages" talked about in the most recent East Coast RUS!Think the NE was due to get an additional Pacer from somewhere (from either a Nexus or ITA report I ready recently).
Exactly! But I'll wager that the seven returned from FGW will have no effect on Pacer workings in the North East, being as they were Newton Heath units before they transferred away, and having all graduated back there now to the best of my knowledge. It'll still be all single 142s through Middlesborough and Newcastle no doubt. Of course there aren't the same problems of capacity in the north east as there are in Leeds and Manchester, but throwing Heaton a few "scraps" from Newton Heaths' table might be nice to allow a couple of doubled up Pacer workings to run through Newcastle in the peaks.
Good grief. If this proves to be the case, then I retract my previous statement, and you can consider my mind blown.There's a table in the current issue of Rail showing how Northerns stock is being distributed, from memory +7 142s for Heaton.
There's a table in the current issue of Rail showing how Northerns stock is being distributed, from memory +7 142s for Heaton.
Purely out of curiosity, are there any services in the north east (ie. Newcastle area) that could be operated by EMUs, rather than DMUs?
There's a 2 hourly service north from Metrocentre which could be EMU following wiring of Metrocentre-Newcastle Central. But it'd be a micro fleet to maintain at Heaton, unless TP North EMU stock was used.
Yes, pretty much half the Heaton 142 diagrams (Twelve of them, I believe) are in Yorkshire. So it is certainly possible that the lines radiating from Newcastle and Middlesborough won't actually see any of the additional units, but I would hope that that's not going to be the case.Am i right in my understanding that some of the heaton pacers operate diagrams out of sheffield and leeds. So yes 7 may be allocated there but none of them could actually operate in NE technically....
Of course i could be talking out of my arse....
For the reasons that IanXC outlines, it's highly unlikely. There's only an hourly train (during the main part of the day) between the Metrocentre and Morpeth that could benefit from the wires, and it would be an incredibly small micro fleet of EMUs for Heaton to maintain.How likely is wiring up of the section to Metrocentre? Wiring it up and building a connection with the T&W Metro would seem the more logical solution - to me, anyway.
Good grief. If this proves to be the case, then I retract my previous statement, and you can consider my mind blown.
RAIL 684 p27: said:Heaton +8 (ex-FGW 142), +8
Neville Hill +20 (ex-FSR 322), +20
Newton Heath +6 (ex-FGW 142), +36 (ex-LM 150), -8 (156 to EMT), -56 (156 to Allerton), -37
Allerton +56 (ex NH 156), +56
How does 37 156 vehicles come about, is one in bits?
Hmm well there is something up isnt there.
The bold figure at the end of the row is the overall figure for the depot, but clearly Newton Heath's figures dont add up, I make the correct figure -22...
- 15 180 carriges lovely jubbly
Ah yes of course. Nice of them to include information that actually makes sense...
142 029/064 have been allocated to Heaton on arrival back to Northern from FGW. They have both been operating around the North East in the last month.
Ah, so that's where theyve got to!
Look on the brightside, thay may still be a Pacer, but there ex Exeter Pacers - So they'll be in far better nic than Newton Heaths lot!
They're not 'ex-Exeter' Pacers, they're 'ex-Exeter-ex-Storage-ex-run-into-ground' Pacers. FGW put some new seat covers on them, ooh be still my beating heart :roll:
Purely out of curiosity, are there any services in the north east (ie. Newcastle area) that could be operated by EMUs, rather than DMUs?
electra27000 said:How likely is wiring up of the section to Metrocentre? Wiring it up and building a connection with the T&W Metro would seem the more logical solution - to me, anyway.
They're not 'ex-Exeter' Pacers, they're 'ex-Exeter-ex-Storage-ex-run-into-ground' Pacers. FGW put some new seat covers on them, ooh be still my beating heart :roll: